↓ Skip to main content

SUMO

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'SUMO'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 SUMO
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 SUMO
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Reconstitution of the Recombinant RanBP2 SUMO E3 Ligase Complex.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Production and Purification of Recombinant SUMOylated Proteins Using Engineered Bacteria.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 A Fluorescent In Vitro Assay to Investigate Paralog-Specific SUMO Conjugation.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 SUMO
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Real-Time Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) for the Analysis of Interactions Between SUMO Traps and Mono- or PolySUMO Moieties.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 SUMO
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 SUMO
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Detection of Protein SUMOylation In Situ by Proximity Ligation Assays.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 In Situ SUMOylation and DeSUMOylation Assays: Fluorescent Methods to Visualize SUMOylation and DeSUMOylation in Permeabilized Cells.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 SUMO
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Label-Free Identification and Quantification of SUMO Target Proteins.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 The Use of Multimeric Protein Scaffolds for Identifying Multi-SUMO Binding Proteins.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 SUMO
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 SUMO
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 SUMO
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 SUMO
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 SUMO
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Systematic Localization and Identification of SUMOylation Substrates in Knock-In Mice Expressing Affinity-Tagged SUMO1.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Erratum
Attention for Chapter 19: SUMO
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
SUMO
Chapter number 19
Book title
SUMO
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6358-4_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6356-0, 978-1-4939-6358-4
Authors

Reiter, Katherine H, Matunis, Michael J, Katherine H. Reiter, Michael J. Matunis

Editors

Manuel S. Rodriguez

Abstract

Reversible protein modification by small ubiquitin-related modifiers (SUMOs) regulates many cellular processes, including transcription, protein quality control, cell division, and oxidative stress. SUMOylation is therefore essential for normal cell function and represents a potentially valuable target for the development of inhibitors of pathogenic eukaryotic organisms, including the malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum (Pf). The specific and essential functions of SUMOylation in Pf, however, remain largely uncharacterized. The further development of antimalarial drugs targeting SUMOylation would benefit significantly from a more detailed understanding of its functions and regulation during the parasite life cycle. The recent development of antibodies specific for Pf SUMO provides a valuable tool to study the functions and regulation of SUMOylation. In preliminary studies, we have used immunoblot analysis to demonstrate that SUMOylation levels vary significantly in parasites during different stages of the red blood cell cycle and also in response to oxidative stress. Owing to the dynamic nature of SUMOylation and to the robust activity of SUMO isopeptidases, analysis of SUMOylation in cultured Pf parasites requires a number of precautions during parasite purification and lysis. Here, we outline methods for preserving SUMO conjugates during isolation of Pf parasites from human red blood cell cultures, and for their detection by immunoblot analysis using PfSUMO-specific antibodies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 38%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,471,305
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,924
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,573
of 393,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#845
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.