↓ Skip to main content

Lung Cancer and Personalized Medicine: Novel Therapies and Clinical Management

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Emerging Biomarkers in Personalized Therapy of Lung Cancer
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Emerging Biomarkers in Personalized Therapy of Lung Cancer
Chapter number 2
Book title
Lung Cancer and Personalized Medicine: Novel Therapies and Clinical Management
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24932-2_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-924931-5, 978-3-31-924932-2
Authors

Philip T. Cagle, Kirtee Raparia, Bryce P. Portier, Cagle, Philip T, Raparia, Kirtee, Portier, Bryce P, Philip T. Cagle M.D., Kirtee Raparia M.D., Bryce P. Portier M.D., Ph.D., Cagle, Philip T., Portier, Bryce P.

Editors

Aamir Ahmad, Shirish M. Gadgeel

Abstract

The two clinically validated and Food and Drug Administration approved lung cancer predictive biomarkers (epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations) occur in only about 20 % of lung adenocarcinomas and acquired resistance develops to first generation drugs. Several other oncogenic drivers for lung adenocarcinoma have emerged as potentially druggable targets with new predictive biomarkers. Oncologists are requesting testing for ROS1 translocations which predict susceptibility to crizotinib, already approved for ALK positive lung cancers. Other potential biomarkers which are currently undergoing clinical trials are RET, MET, HER2 and BRAF. Detection of these biomarkers includes fluorescent in situ hybridization and/or reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (ROS1, RET, HER2), mutation analysis (BRAF) and immunohistochemistry (MET). Screening by immunohistochemistry may be useful for some biomarkers (ROS1, BRAF). Targeted next generation sequencing techniques may be useful as well. These five biomarkers are under consideration for inclusion in revised lung cancer biomarker guidelines by the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and Association for Molecular Pathology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2016.
All research outputs
#12,880,313
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,727
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,659
of 390,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#143
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.