↓ Skip to main content

Crossroads Between Innate and Adaptive Immunity V

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: Mechanisms of Memory T Cell Activation and Effective Immunity
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Mechanisms of Memory T Cell Activation and Effective Immunity
Chapter number 6
Book title
Crossroads Between Innate and Adaptive Immunity V
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15774-0_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-915773-3, 978-3-31-915774-0
Authors

Grégoire Lauvau, Saïdi M’Homa Soudja

Abstract

Effective immunization induces the development of populations of robust effector lymphocytes specific for the immunizing antigens. Amongst them are cytotoxic/CD8(+)T lymphocytes, which few will further differentiate into long-lived memory cells persisting in the host and exhibiting improved functional characteristics. The current model is that such memory cells can confer rapid host protection upon cognate antigen-mediated activation and direct killing of infected cells. In this chapter, we discuss work from our group and others that highlight the contribution of inflammatory cytokines to memory CD8(+) T cell activation and of cytolysis-independent mechanisms of host protection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 14 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#17,944,820
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,113
of 4,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,262
of 354,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#156
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.