↓ Skip to main content

Crossroads Between Innate and Adaptive Immunity V

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Functional Diversity of Human Dendritic Cells.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Functional Diversity of Human Dendritic Cells.
Chapter number 4
Book title
Crossroads Between Innate and Adaptive Immunity V
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15774-0_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-915773-3, 978-3-31-915774-0
Authors

Klechevsky, Eynav, Eynav Klechevsky

Abstract

At the crossroad between innate and adaptive immunity are the dendritic Cells (DCs), a "novel cell type." discovered in 1973 by Ralph Steinman. Although not entirely appreciated at first, it is clear that they play a critical role as specialized antigen-presenting cells and essential mediators in shaping immune reactivity and tolerance. Dendritic cells are now recognized as a heterogeneous group of cells in terms of cell-surface markers, anatomic location, and function adapted to protect against an array of pathogens and conditions. Importantly, these subsets are also unique to each species. While significant progress has been made on the identification and function of mouse DC subsets, much less is known about human cells. Here we review the fascinating biology of human skin DCs and describe tolerogenic principles that are critical in maintaining immune homeostasis and for controlling inflammation, as well as mechanisms that are fundamental to confer immunity. We surmise that these principles could be applied to DCs across organs, and could be harnessed for the treatment of various human autoimmune, inflammatory diseases, as well as cancer. Importantly, to leverage the relevance of basic research to the clinical setting, it is first necessary to determine the functional homology between mouse and human DCs. We discuss practical steps towards this aim.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Other 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 10 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,345,593
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,503
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,013
of 353,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#119
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.