You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Co-immunoprecipitation for Identifying Protein-Protein Interactions in Borrelia burgdorferi
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 4 |
Book title |
Borrelia burgdorferi
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7383-5_4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7382-8, 978-1-4939-7383-5
|
Authors |
Henna Iqbal, Darrin R. Akins, Melisha R. Kenedy |
Abstract |
Co-immunoprecipitation can be utilized to study protein-protein interactions from various environments, cell types, or tissues. Herein, we describe a co-immunoprecipitation protocol that can be used to examine protein complexes found in the pathogenic spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. The method outlined here has successfully identified known and unknown members of borrelial protein complexes and is an efficient method for studying protein interactions in this pathogenic spirochete. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 33 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 35% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 11% |
Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,574,814
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,961
of 13,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,447
of 442,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.