↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Genomics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 15: Bioinformatic Approaches for Comparative Analysis of Viruses
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Bioinformatic Approaches for Comparative Analysis of Viruses
Chapter number 15
Book title
Comparative Genomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7463-4_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7461-0, 978-1-4939-7463-4
Authors

Deyvid Amgarten, Chris Upton, Amgarten, Deyvid, Upton, Chris

Abstract

The field of viral genomic studies has experienced an unprecedented increase in data volume. New strains of known viruses are constantly being added to the GenBank database and so are completely new species with little or no resemblance to our databases of sequences. In addition to this, metagenomic techniques have the potential to further increase the number and rate of sequenced genomes. Besides, it is important to consider that viruses have a set of unique features that often break down molecular biology dogmas, e.g., the flux of information from RNA to DNA in retroviruses and the use of RNA molecules as genomes. As a result, extracting meaningful information from viral genomes remains a challenge and standard methods for comparing the unknown and our databases of characterized sequences may need to be modified. Thus, several bioinformatic approaches and tools have been created to address the challenge of analyzing viral data. In this chapter, we offer descriptions and protocols of some of the most important bioinformatic techniques for comparative analysis of viruses. We also provide comments and discussion on how viruses' unique features can affect standard analyses and how to overcome some of the major sources of problems. Topics include: (1) Clustering of related genomes, (2) Whole genome multiple sequence alignments for small RNA viruses, (3) Protein alignments for marker genes, (4) Analyses based on ortholog groups, and (5) Taxonomic identification and comparisons of viruses from environmental datasets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Researcher 3 10%
Unspecified 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 10%
Unspecified 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,515,212
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,285
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,766
of 442,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#112
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.