↓ Skip to main content

Heart Failure

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Heart Failure'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Direct Myosin Activation by Omecamtiv Mecarbil for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Heart Failure Caused by Ischemic or Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Immunosuppression and Its Implications
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Heart Failure Guidelines on Pharmacotherapy
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Role of Hyperkalemia in Heart Failure and the Therapeutic Use of Potassium Binders
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Comorbidities in Heart Failure
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Vasopressin and Vasopressin Antagonists in Heart Failure
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Iron Deficiency Treatment in Patients with Heart Failure
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 Cardiac Myosin Activation with Gene Therapy Produces Sustained Inotropic Effects and May Treat Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 55 Ivabradine.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 56 Wnt Signaling in Cardiac Remodeling and Heart Failure
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 74 Epidemiology of Heart Failure
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 75 Clinical Trial Design, Endpoints, and Regulatory Requirements
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 76 Steroidal and Novel Non-steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Heart Failure and Cardiorenal Diseases: Comparison at Bench and Bedside
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 77 Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Heart Failure
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 80 Platelet-Derived Growth Factor in Heart Failure
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 81 Gene Therapy in Heart Failure
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 82 Cardiac Phosphodiesterases and Their Modulation for Treating Heart Disease
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 83 Partial Adenosine A1 Agonist in Heart Failure
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 86 Biomarkers of Heart Failure with Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 88 New and Emerging Therapies and Targets: Beta-3 Agonists
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 99 Noncoding RNAs in Heart Failure
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 100 Novel sGC Stimulators and sGC Activators for the Treatment of Heart Failure
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 101 The Three-Decade Long Journey in Heart Failure Drug Development
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 123 Mitochondrial Therapies in Heart Failure
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 126 Anticoagulation Therapy and NOACs in Heart Failure
Attention for Chapter 126: Anticoagulation Therapy and NOACs in Heart Failure
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Anticoagulation Therapy and NOACs in Heart Failure
Chapter number 126
Book title
Heart Failure
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/164_2016_126
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-959658-7, 978-3-31-959659-4
Authors

Isac Thomas, Jorge EncisoSilva, Michelle Schlueter, Barry Greenberg, Thomas, Isac, EncisoSilva, Jorge, Schlueter, Michelle, Greenberg, Barry

Abstract

Current evidence indicates that heart failure (HF) confers a hyper-coagulable state that is associated with adverse events including stroke, systemic embolism, and mortality. This may be due to the elevated levels of pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory cytokines that are seen in patients with acute and chronic HF. Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in patients with systolic dysfunction predispose to local thrombosis due to blood stasis as does atrial fibrillation (AF) which leads to blood stasis in regions of the atria. The high risk of thromboemboli in HF patients with AF has resulted in the use anticoagulation therapy to prevent the occurrence of catastrophic events. There is evidence, however, that the pro-inflammatory, pro-thrombotic state that exists in HF puts patients who are in sinus rhythm at risk. The novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been shown in RCT to have at least equivalent efficacy in reducing stroke as warfarin while exposing patients to a lower risk of bleeding. The fact that the NOACs don't require routine monitoring to assure that patients remain within the therapeutic range and have relatively simple dosing requirements and a safer risk profile makes them attractive substitutes to warfarin in HF patients with atrial fibrillation and other conditions (e.g. deep venous thrombosis). Post hoc analyses from a subset of HF patients from the RCTs in AF patients have demonstrated similar findings as were reported in the entire populations that were included in the trials. As a result, NOACS are commonly used now in HF patients with AF. For HF patients with reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm, the use of warfarin in randomized clinical trials (RCT) to reduce stroke has been disappointing and associated with increase bleeding risk when compared to aspirin. The advantages of the NOACs over warfarin, however, raise the question of whether they might improve outcomes in HF patients who are in sinus rhythm. The currently ongoing COMMANDER-HF trial has been designed to address this issue. In this chapter we review evidence of existence of a prothombotic state in HF, the pharmacodynamics and clinical trials of the NOACs and the outcomes from NOAC substudies in the HF subgroup. We also discuss the rationale for using anticoagulation in HF independent of arrhythmia burden.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 23 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,554,540
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#229
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,838
of 394,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#24
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.