↓ Skip to main content

Human Cytomegaloviruses

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Human Cytomegaloviruses'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 History of the molecular biology of cytomegaloviruses.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Overview of Human Cytomegalovirus Pathogenesis
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Distinct Properties of Human Cytomegalovirus Strains and the Appropriate Choice of Strains for Particular Studies
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Use of Diploid Human Fibroblasts as a Model System to Culture, Grow, and Study Human Cytomegalovirus Infection
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Use of Recombinant Approaches to Construct Human Cytomegalovirus Mutants
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The use of primary human cells (fibroblasts, monocytes, and others) to assess human cytomegalovirus function.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Hematopoietic Long-Term Culture (hLTC) for Human Cytomegalovirus Latency and Reactivation.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Analysis of Cytomegalovirus Binding/Entry-Mediated Events
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Use of 5-Ethynyl-2′-Deoxyuridine Labelling and Flow Cytometry to Study Cell Cycle-Dependent Regulation of Human Cytomegalovirus Gene Expression
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Methods for Studying the Function of Cytomegalovirus GPCRs
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Methods for the Detection of Cytomegalovirus in Glioblastoma Cells and Tissues
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Methods to Study the Nucleocytoplasmic Transport of Macromolecules with Respect to Their Impact on the Regulation of Human Cytomegalovirus Gene Expression
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Fluorescence-Based Laser Capture Microscopy Technology Facilitates Identification of Critical In Vivo Cytomegalovirus Transcriptional Programs
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Techniques for Characterizing Cytomegalovirus-Encoded miRNAs.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 What We Have Learned from Animal Models of HCMV
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Rodent models of congenital cytomegalovirus infection.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Recent approaches and strategies in the generation of antihuman cytomegalovirus vaccines.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Approaches for the Generation of New Anti-cytomegalovirus Agents: Identification of Protein–Protein Interaction Inhibitors and Compounds Against the HCMV IE2 Protein
Attention for Chapter 14: Techniques for Characterizing Cytomegalovirus-Encoded miRNAs.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Techniques for Characterizing Cytomegalovirus-Encoded miRNAs.
Chapter number 14
Book title
Human Cytomegaloviruses
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-788-4_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-787-7, 978-1-62703-788-4
Authors

Hook LM, Landais I, Hancock MH, Nelson JA, Lauren M. Hook, Igor Landais, Meaghan H. Hancock, Jay A. Nelson

Abstract

microRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression at the posttranscriptional level, by binding to sites within the 3' untranslated regions of messenger RNA (mRNA) transcripts. The discovery of this completely new mechanism of gene regulation necessitated the development of a variety of techniques to further characterize miRNAs, their expression, and function. In this chapter, we will discuss techniques currently used in the miRNA field to express, detect, and inhibit miRNAs as well as methods used to identify their targets.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Computer Science 1 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 14%
Other 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2014.
All research outputs
#5,478,353
of 9,704,800 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,538
of 7,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,019
of 210,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#22
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,704,800 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,427 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.