↓ Skip to main content

Conceptual Structures for STEM Research and Education

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Conceptual Structures for STEM Research and Education'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Conceptual Structures for STEM Data
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Relating Language to Perception, Action, and Feelings
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 PurposeNet: A Knowledge Base Organized around Purpose
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Classical Syllogisms in Logic Teaching
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 A Model to Compare and Manipulate Situations Represented as Semantically Labeled Graphs
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Analyzing Clusters and Constellations from Untwisting Shortened Links on Twitter Using Conceptual Graphs
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Taking SPARQL 1.1 Extensions into Account in the SWIP System
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 System Architecture to Implement a Conceptual Graphs Storage in an RDF Quad Store
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Medical Archetypes and Information Extraction Templates in Automatic Processing of Clinical Narratives
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Using Conceptual Structures in the Design of Computer-Based Assessment Software
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Modeling Ontological Structures with Type Classes in Coq
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Parse Thicket Representation for Multi-sentence Search
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 FCA-Based Models and a Prototype Data Analysis System for Crowdsourcing Platforms
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Toward a Peircean Theory of Human Learning: Revealing the Misconception of Belief Revision
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 FOLE: The First-order Logical Environment
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Designing Learning to Research the Formal Concept Analysis of Transactional Data
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Cross-Domain Inference Using Conceptual Graphs in Context of Laws of Science
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Summarizing Conceptual Graphs for Automatic Summarization Task
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Logical Form vs. Logical Form: How Does the Difference Matter for Semantic Computationality?
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Model for Knowledge Representation of Multidimensional Measurements Processing Results in the Environment of Intelligent GIS
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Transformation of SBVR Business Rules to UML Class Model
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Representation of the Event Bush Approach in Terms of Directed Hypergraphs
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Concept Lattices of a Relational Structure
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Representing Median Networks with Concept Lattices
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Txt2vz: A New Tool for Generating Graph Clouds
Attention for Chapter 13: FCA-Based Models and a Prototype Data Analysis System for Crowdsourcing Platforms
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
FCA-Based Models and a Prototype Data Analysis System for Crowdsourcing Platforms
Chapter number 13
Book title
Conceptual Structures for STEM Research and Education
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-35786-2_13
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-235785-5, 978-3-64-235786-2
Authors

Dmitry I. Ignatov, Alexandra Yu. Kaminskaya, Anastasya A. Bezzubtseva, Andrey V. Konstantinov, Jonas Poelmans, Ignatov, Dmitry I., Kaminskaya, Alexandra Yu., Bezzubtseva, Anastasya A., Konstantinov, Andrey V., Poelmans, Jonas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 67%
Engineering 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2013.
All research outputs
#15,263,666
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,646
of 8,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,579
of 282,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#188
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.