RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (or not) https://t.co/rUhxZovuwv
RT @emilskeptic: .@CriticalDragon1 @Zennistrad broadly agree but issue w low quality/diversity in social sci http://t.co/f8tDfsYfvy http://…
«Мы воспроизвели 100 экспериментальных и корелляционных исследований, опубликованных в трех психологических... https://t.co/TtnphhxDsS
Replicate 100 experiments from 3 top journals -> these scientists found only 1/3 to 1/2 of findings were seen again https://t.co/2A8aryuCuB
@MarieBurnier @skeptboarder Je ne parlais même pas des psychanalystes et m'incluais dans le lot 😅 https://t.co/Dla9kvynK3
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science via @sciencemagazine https://t.co/MlHyFOufjm
Interesting on many levels. #variability is key. https://t.co/1I8A2F9taU
RT @pauldauenhauer: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science | Science https://t.co/9am1V2qljM
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science | Science https://t.co/9am1V2qljM
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science @david_colquhoun @stephensenn @RogueRad https://t.co/GzsNG9H0Or
Following Bayesian statistical analysis, ~70% of the replicates within CIs of original studies. Bayes' power... https://t.co/Jgwk4cspuA https://t.co/YUZg3lMoTq
@HermanWerfhorst @wv012 @pvdmeersch Gok gebaseerd op https://t.co/xYFuqzHEIe of https://t.co/nQh8gtWrTM - beiden staan conslusie niet toe.
RT @VinayPrasad82: Psych irreproducibility = big Critics who say their results true only under v. spec. circumstances miss the point! https…
RT @VinayPrasad82: Psych irreproducibility = big Critics who say their results true only under v. spec. circumstances miss the point! https…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/ZAcZY4FTIE
Would real world research fill this gap? From lab 2 clinical use mind & expecations are in another world https://t.co/vSGpwu0oQ4
RT @RemiGau: Our first "Everything is fucked" journal club @UoB_SoP is this friday! Starting "small": https://t.co/KX7DUM9soD h/t @garner_t…
Our first "Everything is fucked" journal club @UoB_SoP is this friday! Starting "small": https://t.co/KX7DUM9soD h/t @garner_theory @hardsci
Responses to this paper perfectly illustrate irreproducibility of inference https://t.co/G9ge758LqS (ie, "I don't believe that") #utahrr16
@tatutxiki Eta hau @sciencemagazine koa: https://t.co/zSck6ygUPv @berria
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/IVJ9nYbi5u
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/UQKIbMATop
Why replication is critical in psychological (and other) sciences - because a single study may well be wrong https://t.co/vMci06P6cP
RT @Newhealthpsych: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/CANmD1gxYR https://t.co/3aywDJ8Wyo
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/CANmD1gxYR https://t.co/3aywDJ8Wyo
RT @ajzellmer: Great discussion in @oxybiostats today about #reproducibility in science & @OSFramework paper: https://t.co/FkCPcrmXTA
Great discussion in @oxybiostats today about #reproducibility in science & @OSFramework paper: https://t.co/FkCPcrmXTA
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science #uxresearch https://t.co/Wp48acY9hI
@HillaryClinton US Presidents must “qualify their own words” over being erudite; there are advisors for the latter. https://t.co/nEyywX6YW8
if these studies have 80% power, we would expect 20 (on average) of them to be false negatives, yes? https://t.co/g1A3F165fc
#Estimating the #reproducibility of #psychological science | Science https://t.co/mgeXxFWIYL
Is psychological science reproducible? https://t.co/TOne9UYWPU
@TheYoungTurks Psychology = pseudoscience - reproducibility of psychology is less than 50% - https://t.co/yY5mqeJxjS Less than random. Shame
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science | Science https://t.co/SVIUVDFxqK
@Leibowitz1987 @catoletters Oh, and by the way, don't use the NHST. We won't listen: https://t.co/i4oSGoCW4P https://t.co/s0AEyMpQ4X
@Ryon_D I would caution against using "psychology research" as a Science, instead it is a Practice. More on this: https://t.co/pclZbmz21a
@neiltyson Only 40% of studies are replicated, so we could choose wrong policy 60% of the time. https://t.co/RV0a1pvmVw #LiberalOverreach
@MJBiercuk @adamgdunn @whereisdaz Psych reproducibility & open* advocate, see @OSFramework & e.g. https://t.co/EcJownpMon
La fiabilidad de los estudios psicológicos, cuestionada by Science Magazine. Durante estos últimos años se han... https://t.co/NckphsY2mm
Only 39 out of 100 psychology studies replicate, writes @BrianNosek & friends @sciencemagazine: https://t.co/OyMtv1aOhO. Nudge with care ...
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/jP3bdMuQPl
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/kSUncHgu0N
Only 1/3 of replicated psychology experiments reach significance https://t.co/AjpGR06HuM
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/q6IChcVhbi
First Thursdays are Journal Club Thursdays! Today we're looking at reproducibility: https://t.co/Yj9uaIbPwA
Talking about https://t.co/cNvLR4alNk today with my Bachelor students, who did not find expected effect in their (still exciting!) project
RT @eturnermd1: @dr_ilardi @williamspsych @JohnSakaluk @CoyneoftheRealm Another example by this one from psychology: https://t.co/PHa0AbfSr…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/hmKGUUbW0q
@dr_ilardi @williamspsych @JohnSakaluk @CoyneoftheRealm Another example by this one from psychology: https://t.co/PHa0AbfSrY via @BrianNosek
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/SSQ8FtCknf
@janarhertz último: lo tenías a éste? https://t.co/KkDRdHWK2p firma un compa de @psicoudelar . un uruguayo no podía faltar.
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/GE7k6TDVRx
あとで読む。 / “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science | Science” https://t.co/NOt4q3oIwM
I generate results therefore I am https://t.co/UsznS68lgD
Weird new diagnoses, perversion of old 1s in recent yrs + lack of sound science now raising concerns https://t.co/uXbo3IQHmL #Fxbg #FredX 4
We need to strengthen science by replicating results. Journal club this week https://t.co/Z1AJdhHmP9 @sciencemagazine
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/7fSN2YDDIR
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/3pSMfG3qxe
RT @deanesmay: .@BristolBen Some things to think on: https://t.co/apvDDnPK4c https://t.co/SiofERsyiX https://t.co/CBkW95XG8k
.@BristolBen Some things to think on: https://t.co/apvDDnPK4c https://t.co/SiofERsyiX https://t.co/CBkW95XG8k
@mindph @intelligent50 Some other things to think on: https://t.co/CBkW95XG8k https://t.co/DCwaKP5ybX https://t.co/apvDDnPK4c
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/HlE5Bt6YXn
Article on reproducing psychology research https://t.co/Jn1VcfNKPE Work from Open Science Collaboration https://t.co/AtD4gZ33xF
Estimating the reproducibility of #psychological science 1/3 to 1/2 https://t.co/rzvkXFYPdD
RT @inkflavored: >>그나마 재현된 것들도 애초에 보고보다 훨씬 적은 효과가 발견. 논문: http://t.co/GomGcktI0Y 기사: http://t.co/P1k4pFwzaz
For research to matter, how will #AERA16 deal with this? https://t.co/5SgKYkrLPc
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/AH4fMg3dMt
@kirstie_j @russpoldrack @OSFramework Not so easy to answer! https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS for some comments +OSC2012 & https://t.co/OtRxGNrXR7
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science | Science https://t.co/K21GKyPxWc
RT @RockZen: ≈Fake: low reproducibility of psychological #science - #finance is even worse, I guess. https://t.co/knchKuK8je https://t.co/y…
≈Fake: low reproducibility of psychological #science - #finance is even worse, I guess. https://t.co/knchKuK8je https://t.co/ybGRqmitZA
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science | Science https://t.co/kuGEr6Rsy9
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/SII0HpCl5v
RT @mwkraus: Do yourself a favor this week & re-read the #reproducibility proj. What an amazing/careful science enterprise! https://t.co/uU…
Do yourself a favor this week & re-read the #reproducibility proj. What an amazing/careful science enterprise! https://t.co/uUWgvcloNG
https://t.co/lfC6gBgigS if 'reproducibility' is used to assess psychology science research, up to 50% fail the test!
PSEUDOCIENCIA Solo cerca del 30% de estudios psicológicos han podido ser reproducidos. https://t.co/CeOS0RtaWT
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
@microsiervos en fuente original https://t.co/ybOZB41Dk1 A large portion of replications produced weaker evidence for the original findings
OSC data consistent with "quite high" #reproducibility, claim critics: https://t.co/AdlcdqQ0BV via @sciencemagazine https://t.co/MRlFDxaLHx
Methods of Open Science Collaboration Project's study https://t.co/f44ZlKBIKT challenged in @sciencemagazine: https://t.co/F2HAJyBsCr
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
this discussion section is a clear, measured description of the goals/scope of the reproducibility project https://t.co/uvmKMRRTEe
RT @luc_bussiere: Gr8 disc @AnimalEcol_UU 2day on replicability & https://t.co/3FiTh4YV6c by @BrianNosek et al. 5 highlights & poll follow.
@PhiLoThough @Abebab Here is the original reference for the RPP in Science: https://t.co/VFRkHcmz0c
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
A fantastic article on reproducibility of Psychology studies. Results as expected based on stats theory. A must read https://t.co/Avi23pgqp8
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…