RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/gWvEztAbv8
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaM…
ICYMI: This is the conclusion of the #ReproducibilityProject original paper (https://t.co/fvrc3HqUNS): https://t.co/8Zu3aaMxLR
Estimating the reproducibility of #PsychologicalScience https://t.co/naTdUY9JFw
Gr8 disc @AnimalEcol_UU 2day on replicability & https://t.co/3FiTh4YV6c by @BrianNosek et al. 5 highlights & poll follow.
@MarshallFarts5 @gamblor5555 @FashyNeko @atrendiwoman @mattstat https://t.co/T8nJCODz6C Here ya go, duder.
Is emphasis on significance driving artificial significance? Science: Estimating reproducibility of psych science https://t.co/zWJA9x0jEB
I'm calling it - paper of the year - and it is only February! https://t.co/1AsvbMf1Ys
@mivich @dgwbirch Yes, having reproducible experiments is so boring ... https://t.co/sd23F2gymy
RT @kara_makara: Important work by Nosek et al estimating the reproducibility of psych studies - 36% of replications were stat. sig. https:…
Important work by Nosek et al estimating the reproducibility of psych studies - 36% of replications were stat. sig. https://t.co/S5U1Hcg9OA
@R0ssGarner @dds180 part of the problem is these stories are based on studies that haven't been reproduced https://t.co/vSwKBgoloA
67% inv. psicológicas no son reproducibles @leonardoamayaMD Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/CYu3tECSVB
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (or not) https://t.co/lXo1VBnq0H
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (or not) https://t.co/rUhxZovuwv
having to study the assumptions of p-values again reminds me of @simoncolumbus et al. great reproducibility project https://t.co/PhD2OfoXkB
Hola, sólo quería comentaros que tan solo un 39% de los artículos en psicología podrían ser replicables: https://t.co/HukOjcFNVV
RT @GiovanniFanfoni: @ricpuglisi @GentleThinker @FuffaForte E oramai sappiamo quanto sia rischioso giungere a conclusioni affrettate https:…
@ricpuglisi @GentleThinker @FuffaForte E oramai sappiamo quanto sia rischioso giungere a conclusioni affrettate https://t.co/lNWj1lXHXV
cognitive psych more likely to replicate than social psych studies. https://t.co/90I75ueWHg evidence is built differently perhaps?
.@boehninglab "...studies can’t be reproduced, & this would fall into that category." 2nd, psychology also >50% https://t.co/cAjYQNIB86 3/3
#ReproducibilityProject-100 psych replications w/effects 1/2 sizeof originals https://t.co/zSeFsi9bWE https://t.co/SR1FNPpyHX @OSFramework
RT @Khalid_Aljaber: نشرت مجلة ساينس بحثا مذهلا عن موضوعية #علم_النفس أعادوا بحث 100 بحث نفسي تجريبي فخرجت نتائج مختلفة في ثلثي الأبحاث! htt…
RT @Khalid_Aljaber: نشرت مجلة ساينس بحثا مذهلا عن موضوعية #علم_النفس أعادوا بحث 100 بحث نفسي تجريبي فخرجت نتائج مختلفة في ثلثي الأبحاث! htt…
RT @Khalid_Aljaber: نشرت مجلة ساينس بحثا مذهلا عن موضوعية #علم_النفس أعادوا بحث 100 بحث نفسي تجريبي فخرجت نتائج مختلفة في ثلثي الأبحاث! htt…
RT @Khalid_Aljaber: نشرت مجلة ساينس بحثا مذهلا عن موضوعية #علم_النفس أعادوا بحث 100 بحث نفسي تجريبي فخرجت نتائج مختلفة في ثلثي الأبحاث! htt…
RT @Khalid_Aljaber: نشرت مجلة ساينس بحثا مذهلا عن موضوعية #علم_النفس أعادوا بحث 100 بحث نفسي تجريبي فخرجت نتائج مختلفة في ثلثي الأبحاث! htt…
RT @Khalid_Aljaber: نشرت مجلة ساينس بحثا مذهلا عن موضوعية #علم_النفس أعادوا بحث 100 بحث نفسي تجريبي فخرجت نتائج مختلفة في ثلثي الأبحاث! htt…
RT @Khalid_Aljaber: نشرت مجلة ساينس بحثا مذهلا عن موضوعية #علم_النفس أعادوا بحث 100 بحث نفسي تجريبي فخرجت نتائج مختلفة في ثلثي الأبحاث! htt…
RT @Khalid_Aljaber: نشرت مجلة ساينس بحثا مذهلا عن موضوعية #علم_النفس أعادوا بحث 100 بحث نفسي تجريبي فخرجت نتائج مختلفة في ثلثي الأبحاث! htt…
نشرت مجلة ساينس بحثا مذهلا عن موضوعية #علم_النفس أعادوا بحث 100 بحث نفسي تجريبي فخرجت نتائج مختلفة في ثلثي الأبحاث! https://t.co/D1pShX2NSo
“Does the replication study itself need replication?” | Myers https://t.co/Ekt189V4gW #nitop
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. https://t.co/GclGtVsz0K
Shrink's conclusions only reproducible 1/3 of the time! https://t.co/KG1319sDiw
RT @KriegeskorteLab: an important step for psychology... http://t.co/lQpq9ddqJs
RT @NiallCrumlish: The Reproducibility Project: an astonishing collaboration in academic psychology led by @BrianNosek (HT @mkonnikova) htt…
@tainamuller Science pesquisas em Psicologia: https://t.co/hwsZbtyzCg
RT @GeoffreyPetty: Psychological experiments are usually not reproducible. When they are the effect size is lower. =Meta studies best? http…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. https://t.co/Ppnz0XxDRi
In ethnographic research, we face a challenge and need to have an answer. (reproducibility in psych research) https://t.co/xQeiC4M1Dn
The Reproducibility Project: an astonishing collaboration in academic psychology led by @BrianNosek (HT @mkonnikova) https://t.co/xibAeBuvuq
RT @bill_easterly: Only 36% of replications of psychology research still had statistically significant results https://t.co/XpBzRcefPs
RT @GeoffreyPetty: Psychological experiments are usually not reproducible. When they are the effect size is lower. =Meta studies best? http…
Psychological experiments are usually not reproducible. When they are the effect size is lower. =Meta studies best? https://t.co/PkPwWLgvR8
#ReproducibilityProject-100 psych replications w/effects 1/2 sizeof originals https://t.co/y6RCwdGXky https://t.co/xqgSR6Tx4C @OSFramework
Lets see what the study https://t.co/YmL3fztszu actually says (and it is not exactly what some circulated news claims)
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/kATWyVHycN
#ReproducibilityProject-100 psych replications w/effects 1/2 sizeof originals https://t.co/6dmcevLbJQ https://t.co/WAI7UKrtgh @OSFramework
RT @bill_easterly: Only 36% of replications of psychology research still had statistically significant results https://t.co/XpBzRcefPs
RT @bill_easterly: Only 36% of replications of psychology research still had statistically significant results https://t.co/XpBzRcefPs
RT @bill_easterly: Only 36% of replications of psychology research still had statistically significant results https://t.co/XpBzRcefPs
RT @bill_easterly: Only 36% of replications of psychology research still had statistically significant results https://t.co/XpBzRcefPs
RT @bill_easterly: Only 36% of replications of psychology research still had statistically significant results https://t.co/XpBzRcefPs
RT @bill_easterly: Only 36% of replications of psychology research still had statistically significant results https://t.co/XpBzRcefPs
RT @bill_easterly: Only 36% of replications of psychology research still had statistically significant results https://t.co/XpBzRcefPs
RT @bill_easterly: Only 36% of replications of psychology research still had statistically significant results https://t.co/XpBzRcefPs
Only 36% of replications of psychology research still had statistically significant results https://t.co/XpBzRcefPs
RT @F1000: Try, try again: just how reproducible is psychological science? The numbers indicate there may be a problem. https://t.co/HEIreU…
On estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/HMZcvwM4Cv via @sciencemagazine
Also: "A large portion of replications produced weaker evidence for the original findings" https://t.co/LpJosOcXbn #highered #methodology
Is psychology currently facing a reproducibility crisis? https://t.co/g32ONnHkgE
"Replication effects were half the magnitude of original effects" peer review shld itself be subj to experimentation https://t.co/L6zT8JnI2U
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
今日の院ゼミでは、今年8月にScience誌に掲載された心理学研究の再現性論文をやります。全体で36%、社会心理学領域では25%、認知心理学領域では50%しか再現されなかったという…https://t.co/ShbvZZGaqb https://t.co/tltavi2bmn
@toshi_kuroda このどちらのメディアも「心理学と社会科学」という広範な領域の再現性に問題があるかのように要約しているが、実際の論文は「100の心理学実験の再現性」についてであり、心理学や社会科学の再現性の問題では無い。 https://t.co/F2DvdgUdop
@JenniferJillSch I'm at the place where I take all psychology findings as provisional until replicated. https://t.co/rqKMvhvsUb
RT @gvwilson: Re https://t.co/KWXwsEVeGl, looking for studies or data showing computational science any less reproducible than physical exp…