↓ Skip to main content

To Belong or Not to Belong: Evidence That Women’s Occupational Disidentification Is Promoted by Lack of Fit With Masculine Occupational Prototypes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Personnel Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 101)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To Belong or Not to Belong: Evidence That Women’s Occupational Disidentification Is Promoted by Lack of Fit With Masculine Occupational Prototypes
Published in
Journal of Personnel Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.1027/1866-5888/a000067
Authors

Kim Peters, Michelle Ryan, S. Alexander Haslam, Helen Fernandes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 49%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,552,987
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Personnel Psychology
#7
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,465
of 244,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Personnel Psychology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them