You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Chapter title |
Scientific Argumentation Model (SAM): A Heuristic for Reading Research Articles by Science Students
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 12 |
Book title |
Insights from Research in Science Teaching and Learning
|
Published by |
Springer, Cham, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_12 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-920073-6, 978-3-31-920074-3
|
Authors |
Edwin van Lacum, Marcel Koeneman, Miriam Ossevoort, Martin Goedhart, van Lacum, Edwin, Koeneman, Marcel, Ossevoort, Miriam, Goedhart, Martin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 16% |
Lecturer | 3 | 12% |
Professor | 3 | 12% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Other | 6 | 24% |
Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 9 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 8% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 24% |