↓ Skip to main content

Aging and Aging-Related Diseases

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Intestinal Homeostasis and Longevity: Drosophila Gut Feeling
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Intestinal Homeostasis and Longevity: Drosophila Gut Feeling
Chapter number 10
Book title
Aging and Aging-Related Diseases
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-1117-8_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-131116-1, 978-9-81-131117-8
Authors

Xiaolan Fan, Uma Gaur, Mingyao Yang, Fan, Xiaolan, Gaur, Uma, Yang, Mingyao

Abstract

The association between intestinal homeostasis and life span has caught the attention of the research community worldwide. There have been multiple evidences which support the role of gut homeostasis in aging. The Drosophila gastrointestinal tract is very similar to the mammalian gut, and therefore it can directly be used as a model to understand the association between gut microbiota, immune system, and aging in humans. In current review we have discussed the importance of gut microbiota in aging. Also we have highlighted the importance of host immune system and gut aging. Since the increased microbial load in the gut activates the host immune system, the dysregulated microbiota can have direct implications in gut aging. The proliferation and renewal of intestinal stem cells can also affect gut aging. Another important aspect that we have discussed is the communication between the gut and the other organ systems which affect the overall aging process. Altogether we propose that the Drosophila gut can be a good model to improve our understanding of human gut aging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Environmental Science 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,941,392
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#4,061
of 5,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#381,038
of 444,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#199
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.