RT @xazalbert: Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @xazalbert: Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @xazalbert: Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @xazalbert: Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
@Risemelbourne And the #shocker in reply, references’ ‘Lancet’ as a credible source? #NoAmnesty
RT @xazalbert: Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @xazalbert: Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @xazalbert: Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @xazalbert: Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @xazalbert: Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @xazalbert: Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @xazalbert: Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @xazalbert: Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
RT @xazalbert: Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @xazalbert: Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
Merci de restaurer l'info. Alexander Samuel #pollueurdinfo
RT @NicoVedrines: .@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1…
.@BFMCotedazur invite un militant anti Raoult. @raoult_didier mentirait Voici l’étude (LancetGate) https://t.co/6iNHjyU1Yb Il est noté 9.3% de deces dans le groupe controle, 18% pour HCQ. Sur la base des données brutes (corrompues), HCQ tue 8.7% des soi
RT @BeLessWhite_: @0bj3ctivity @unhealthytruth @joe_dycus67 Can't have an Emergency Use Authorization if there's alternatives available, li…
En même temps si on croit à ça (lien ci-dessous), on peut croire en @raoult_didier https://t.co/g1pKVH09x5
RT @robin_genet: Belle saloperie qui est toujours en ligne... https://t.co/g1pKVH09x5
Belle saloperie qui est toujours en ligne... https://t.co/g1pKVH09x5
@soundtrue2 Au cas où: https://t.co/iZHvUoaoO8
RT @BeLessWhite_: @0bj3ctivity @unhealthytruth @joe_dycus67 Can't have an Emergency Use Authorization if there's alternatives available, li…
@0bj3ctivity @unhealthytruth @joe_dycus67 Can't have an Emergency Use Authorization if there's alternatives available, like the one below Looks like there’s dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, politica
Rappel - 06/06/2020: Enquête sur les traces de Surgisphere, la Sté au cœur du scandale de l’étude du "Lancet" 1/ https://t.co/18hE3qZHoP 2/ https://t.co/7S83OG8Ehi #Covid_19 #chloroquine #IHU #DemocratieEnDanger #NiOubliNiPardon
@MDomino07 @4Mischief No it's old news, dems LOVE easy non contributing jobs etc. Take the easy path, trust the science BS Can't have an Emergency Use Authorization if there's alternatives available. Looks like there’s dozens-too many to count- of retract
@PBertaGard @lemondefr Bjr Ci-joint une étude digne de ce nom, méta-analyse, donc de plus haut grade dans l'évaluation clinique https://t.co/ANvni4XcPa Il y aura celles et ceux qui y ont cru et les autres monde scientifique est binaire, c'est vrai ou
2) La revue sur l'hydroxychloriquine de Mehra (https://t.co/fkaF87qyZG), à l'origine du Lancetgate et rétracté depuis. Ce papier déclenché le narratif de la toxicité aiguë de l'HCQ, servant même de prétexte au gouvernement pour stopper tous les essais HCQ
@simonateba @realDonaldTrump Can't have an Emergency Use Authorization if there's alternatives available, like the one below Looks like there’s dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political? #repeal19
RT @dr_louwen: 1.Mehra MR Desai SS Ruschitzka F Patel AN Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COV…
RT @dr_louwen: 1.Mehra MR Desai SS Ruschitzka F Patel AN Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COV…
1.Mehra MR Desai SS Ruschitzka F Patel AN Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis. Lancet. 2020; showing no benefit! Retracted. https://t.co/pnzKfkqFRJ
@markstuartdavis @jiminico @senatorbabet https://t.co/wZSw2EmLpO The retracted paper that smeared hydroxychloroquine
@Maroxad @SocDoneLeft The widely respected Lancet, you say? The same journal caught publishing false studies to push an agenda about the current topic? https://t.co/gMc1Tx8Xhb
RT @_Escapekey_: 24/ Yeah, it was later retracted. This was the infamous 'Surgisphere' study, which was a complete scam. And BBC carried…
24/ Yeah, it was later retracted. This was the infamous 'Surgisphere' study, which was a complete scam. And BBC carried the misinformation on their platform for all to see. https://t.co/V8Q4LFh304 https://t.co/36B9Lmizmn
RT @Melchizedek1972: @Barlos_Bateman @Tarawinterr @stkirsch ‘Facts’ ‘Data’ 🤥🤥🤥🤥 you can only fake data so often before people lose trust.…
@Barlos_Bateman @Tarawinterr @stkirsch ‘Facts’ ‘Data’ 🤥🤥🤥🤥 you can only fake data so often before people lose trust. Exhibit A: https://t.co/UIDgvKDYwa https://t.co/Rmt1HHgAWd
@Scottcrates @TaraBull808 @Scottcrates, can't have an 'Emergency Use Authorization' if there's alternatives available, like the one below Looks like there’s dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, politica
@RepRaskin @RepRaskin, hey commie... can't have an Emergency Use Authorization if there's alternatives available, like the one below Looks like there’s dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Political? #repeal1986act
RETRACTED: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis https://t.co/yblZHELETb - The vilification of Hydroxychloroquine: when all the COVID-19 plandemic took off! @AStramezzi
@unhealthytruth Can't have an Emergency Use Authorization if there's alternatives available, like the one below Looks like there’s dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political? #repeal1986act https:
@TheChiefNerd @krystalball @RobertKennedyJr Can't have an Emergency Use Authorization if there's alternatives available, like the one below Looks like there’s dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, politi
@111Fred111 @LudvicMB un journal de mensonge 😂😂😂https://t.co/rDT9JBpsEE
@SilviaDiDonato6 Si c'e' molta letteratura e anche casistica sul suo uso ma assieme alla ivermectina e' stata stroncata...poi si e' capito perche' https://t.co/a0nkQaipL3 https://t.co/5OddqaJ3EQ
@AJPanadero @Shirza218 @edisn @Victorshi2020 This is an example of articles published in two different website .. one from Lancet and one from NIH for its finality .. now you get it ? https://t.co/LC27zNVkrv https://t.co/txFAoxonBc
@giusbrindisi @AStramezzi Ancora?? Un brindisi alla faccia di bronzo. Cita pure lidrosiclorochina...senza vergogna https://t.co/4DEJo8Uhcj
@kylenabecker "New study" That dismisses all other studies saying otherwise? Not to mention what we see with our eyes? The final command? https://t.co/aSzSQvo4Z4
@elonmusk Can't have an 'Emergency Use Authorization' if there's alternatives available, like the one below Looks like there’s dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political? #repeal1986act https://t.
@elonmusk Can't have an 'Emergency Use Authorization' if there's alternatives available, like the one below Looks like there’s dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political? #repeal1986act https://t.
RT @RegulaAnates: @Cricketm4n @hale_charlie @diamondgirl2018 @TimRunsHisMouth This was one of the major "studies" that suddenly turned one…
@Cricketm4n @hale_charlie @diamondgirl2018 @TimRunsHisMouth This was one of the major "studies" that suddenly turned one of the safest medications for over 80 years into poison. I believe three authors of this entry championed the retraction. https://t
@kutschera_u @SHomburg @EBodderas #FakeScience ist längst endemisch. Mit "Corona" gelang der Übersprung von Wissenschaft auf Politik und damit der größte Coup 💰 https://t.co/iJNYAHJYj0
RT @Melchizedek1972: @JordanSchachtel Exhibit B: Study designed to fail which literally poisoned ( killed) the trial participants by givi…
@JordanSchachtel Exhibit B: Study designed to fail which literally poisoned ( killed) the trial participants by giving lethal dosage of HCQ ( used to demonize HCQ then retracted). See how this works? https://t.co/UIDgvKDqGC
@rachelschraer Many of these studies are funded by Big Pharma, as you know, to ensure the vax maintains emergency authorisation due to no other treatment available. The Lancet HCQ study was retracted as they used massive doses in the study group, to provid
We've detected a paper from PLOS Computational Biology that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/Uj150peYXY Retracted paper: https://t.co/jaDkgRvLSc
RT @robin_genet: Comme elle est toujours consultable, pourquoi s'en priverait-il ? https://t.co/g1pKVH09x5
Comme elle est toujours consultable, pourquoi s'en priverait-il ? https://t.co/g1pKVH09x5
@TheBoinc @GiovaQuez E come è finita l'indagine? https://t.co/FoRYAarHF4
@CharlieGordon20 @alanvibe @PerseusGroup_ @MHRAgovuk @10DowningStreet @nickhunt @hedleyrees @ClareCraigPath @MaidmentRos I see. Like this paper, perhaps? https://t.co/yO7u1pccuo
@BarbraStreisand Can't have a plandemic or an Emergency Use Authorization if there's alternatives available, like the one below Looks like there’s dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political? #repea
@jimbonatius @TRHLofficial We can say the same, then, about the hydroxychloroquine studies and Covid, based on your criteria. The lancet is now discredited from anything, published, ever. 🤦 Get outta here with you crap. You're pissed that you're wrong. Rem
@luigi_maroni @liz_churchill9 Peer reviewed and evidence backed research papers get retracted as well, remember the Lancet study on HCQ? https://t.co/9iih8xG9gC
@rcbregman Lees maar in the lancet : Dus er moet een vervanger komen voor dat medicijn dat dus 65 jaar probleemloos hielp maar sinds 2020 hartritmestornissen geeft. https://t.co/lTWzDL31d6
@jason_willz1 @TheChiefNerd You know what else’s was retracted? HCQ has been being safely used since the late 1800’s https://t.co/4skYb2PT5D
@JeffreyGuterman To fake a pandemic, can't have an Emergency Use Authorization if there's alternatives available, like the one below Looks like there’s dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political? #
@thejackhopkins Can't have an Emergency Use Authorization if there's alternatives available, like the one below Looks like there’s dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political? #repeal1986act https:
@lsdres @allincapital @xBonitax2 @kevinnbass @ClareCraigPath You apparently still don’t understand your position. Your studies are worthless ( and less trusted than you).. https://t.co/UIDgvKDYwa https://t.co/PXuyohECGA
@joelgarcin @JrmeBrwnCt @vladimi73875001 @JeremyFOUBERT1 @SenseurFR @decoder_l @CaudeHenrion @louisfouch3 Pourquoi certaines études n'ont jamais fait l'objet de rétractation ? https://t.co/6zCEI3X5pB
RT @Ghostrider768: @17ThankQ @The_OJW @realDonaldTrump Remember the MSM freak out? Then this happened 😂 https://t.co/4skYb2PT5D
@FukklibsLibs @Jikkyleaks @barnes_law Good point. I'd love to see the same from this one. https://t.co/aSzSQvo4Z4
@VikiLovesFACS Peer-reviewed study: HCQ bad. Oops, peer-review bad. Why was it written? To discredit alternatives to the jabs and bypass EUA rules. How? Liars who call themselves scientists were willing to murder patients by overdosing them. https: