@ScottAdamsSays https://t.co/OPAru0qMlS, This study kills a lots of people. I will help you a bit with ivm, story starts with Nobel price 2015. This African nations didn’t have flu, and some cancers. Statistics didn’t lie and this is how they start to stud
@IanCopeland5 Looks like there’s dozens and dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political? #repeal1986act https://t.co/zHd4mL7ogM
We've detected a paper from Research, Society and Development that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/7Wqgm2Vw1l Retracted paper: https://t.co/jaDkgRvLSc
@ScottAdamsSays @DoomMetalMachi1 @JFGariepy We saw it while it happened, we didn't ONLY look to main stream media. https://t.co/FHte9biEI9
@sicocan @BRoseMDMPH @RepMTG The Lancet Journal, one of the more prestigious journals published this study on HCQ which claimed it was deadly. It caused worldwide pulling of all studies and cessation of use of HCQ in clinical settings. https://t.co/vaF1lZy
@AlexBerenson Show any data saying HCQ is harmful? Using this data? https://t.co/aSzSQvo4Z4
@KariLake Looks like there’s dozens and dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political? There was zero need for the Emergency Use Authorization #repeal1986act https://t.co/zHd4mL6Qre
RT @JikkyKjj: So who did? Who produced that huge amount of data - overnight - that [anons on the internet] proved to be fake? The answer i…
https://t.co/BcYevc0hIW The pharma-controlled Lancet was in such a hurry to discredit hydroxychloroquine, they published this nonsense. Trump was treated with the drug, Fauci was asked at a press conference what to do if he got covid - he answered hydroxyc
@stkirsch And this is how they falsely cut us off from using hydroxychloroquine here in Europe until they could launcg the deadly mRNA-injections on us: https://t.co/w1zDrR3LS5
@candi67843576 @profnfenton @TheLancet The Lancet is an accessory to mass murder after publishing this clearly fraudulent anti-HCQ paper that, thanks to amateur investigators on Twitter, they had to retract only two weeks later. Suppress effective treatmen
@GBNEWS @thecoastguy Lancet? You mean that rag that had to retract the hit piece it did on HCQ? That Lancet? https://t.co/vLJgcVN7gq
RT @DonnoyDarko: @kingojungle Never forget the fake HCQ study where they literally overdosed/killed people to discredit it. https://t.co/…
Foi perceptível logo em 2020 com a retratação que tiveram que fazer... https://t.co/LfHipgGvgw https://t.co/dBCozhWaR0
@profnfenton @TheLancet The Lancet has been a lying pharma-propagandist whoor for years, surprised @stkirsch left this out of his article - May 2020 - https://t.co/aSzSQvo4Z4
Hi Steve, Let’s not let anyone forget that The Lancet published this Bogus “Study”that was used to sabotage the use of Hydroxycloriquin for Covid then was RETRACTED IN FULL after the damage was done. https://t.co/Dn7K2rZyCM @occupiesajob @stkirsch
@stkirsch I realized this early on in 2020. Corruption reigns supreme. https://t.co/UYGYmv2NIK
RT @GregoryChaz1: @FLSurgeonGen This is also why the public has lost trust in medicine, experts, and the "elite" universities such as Harva…
@kingojungle Never forget the fake HCQ study where they literally overdosed/killed people to discredit it. https://t.co/aSzSQvo4Z4
We've detected a paper from The National Medical Journal of India that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/QMTrEey9yl Retracted paper: https://t.co/jaDkgRvLSc
@GrantCardone @BAshbyMD hydroxycloroquine, retracted study, https://t.co/OPAru0qewk
RT @GregoryChaz1: @FLSurgeonGen This is also why the public has lost trust in medicine, experts, and the "elite" universities such as Harva…
@Yablos @CKellyUAP Here's one example😉 https://t.co/JlJ8gzO10k
@GrantCardone RETRACTED: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis https://t.co/EGRFyzmHNM
RT @AJ32800278: @deaconheel @stella_immanuel @elonmusk @richardursomd @TheRightMelissa HCQ FRAUD https://t.co/x2fmdXcvwe Are top medical…
@AlastairMcA30 @stella_immanuel @elonmusk This must be your role model: https://t.co/XOKnJMU2p3
This man changed the course of history. https://t.co/Br5VxzbMlH He is completely safe from professional board overview, unlike those who prescribe "untested therapies." Such is the world.
@FLSurgeonGen This is also why the public has lost trust in medicine, experts, and the "elite" universities such as Harvard. I know its your alma mater, but please don't whitewash and call it out for what it has done and failed to do. https://t.co/G64mjM
@stella_immanuel @elonmusk The intro to Emergency Authorization Act is the reason for quashing voices on 2019-nCoV subject. Looks like there’s dozens and dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political?
@titoortiz Because if there was a viable treatment then EUA couldn't be granted. There were official HCQ trials but the Lancet published a fake report that cancelled them, which has since been retracted. But not before EUA was granted. https://t.co/nfHyMMP
@MarioNawfal HCQ paper retracted by Lancet over politics. https://t.co/MFMbgZbURK
@Blackestknight1 @LOVillaJavea @AlmaEnwiya That's what they said about HCQ 😁 https://t.co/nfHyMMORf5
@LOVillaJavea Looks like there’s dozens and dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political? #repeal1986act https://t.co/zHd4mL7ogM
@tenebra99 @k_b_lvi @thisisnothappen @MelissaaLee13 @Doctor_Eric_B https://t.co/ZpJ9UIvpDY cause the medical journals are so trustworthy on this subject
@celinegounder Looks like there’s dozens and dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political? #repeal1986act https://t.co/zHd4mL6Qre #NoAmnesty #Nuremberg2 #NoToPandemicAmnesty #Nuremberg2Now #Neve
We've detected a paper that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/QFab3408wb Retracted paper: https://t.co/jaDkgRvLSc
RT @JikkyKjj: So who did? Who produced that huge amount of data - overnight - that [anons on the internet] proved to be fake? The answer i…
RT @JikkyKjj: So who did? Who produced that huge amount of data - overnight - that [anons on the internet] proved to be fake? The answer i…
RT @JikkyKjj: So who did? Who produced that huge amount of data - overnight - that [anons on the internet] proved to be fake? The answer i…
Retracted Covid papers based on wrong or made up data have been cited over 2,500 times, with 4/5 citations occurring after the retraction was made. Like this study that wrongly claimed Hydroxychloroquine increased deaths https://t.co/cQWNkKe1lH
In May 2020, the highly reputable journal, Lancet, published a study that found taking hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine had no significant benefit for COVID-19, and instead increased the risk of arrhythmias. The study was later retracted. https://t.co/6c
@fabian_fjalling Menar du den här? The Lancet är en av de högst ansedda vetenskapliga tidskrifterna. Att artiklar dras tillbaka om felaktigheter i metoden avslöjas senare är ingenting konstigt. De har tidigare dragit tillbaka en artikel som länkar vaccin t
@rafaelheras @julia_manero El problema es que el artículo de The Lancet se publicó el 24 de mayo de 2020. La primera ola, en Europa Occidental, se produjo antes, en marzo y abril de 2020. Y SÍ SE USÓ ENTONCES LA HIDROXICLOROQUINA. Al menos en España. Vea e
RT @DschlopesIsBack: No, the Lancet study was literally retracted for fraud. It was completely made up, yet peer reviewed and widely used…
@akheriaty After the Lancet, a well respected intellectual/medical journal, published a "hit piece" on HCQ, then had to retract it due to "questionable data", we all knew where the MiSiNfoRmaTion was coming from. https://t.co/d15Wd4TnAM
RT @DschlopesIsBack: No, the Lancet study was literally retracted for fraud. It was completely made up, yet peer reviewed and widely used…
@RealEarthParty @punishedmother @leigh_dlf Do you mean this one? https://t.co/NNWZa7z1HA Theres nothing wrong with publishing bad research, that's why studies are repeated and there is a review process to find the bad studies. That's why this one is retra
This is the Bogus Study planted in The Lance that “They” used to discredit Hydroxycloriquin then RETRACTED it in full! https://t.co/Dn7K2s06sk
This is the Bogus Hydroxycloriquin Study that was Planted in The Lancet that “Took Down” Hydroxycloriquin. The study was later RETRACTED in full after the damage was done. https://t.co/Dn7K2s06sk @occupiesajob
RT @DschlopesIsBack: No, the Lancet study was literally retracted for fraud. It was completely made up, yet peer reviewed and widely used…
@Citizen1990_ @mabohari @DocLucas4 @ErikLoridan Non du coup je vous ai aussi mis le lien du Lancet vers sa rétractation des fois que mon français ne soit pas clair...🙃https://t.co/4romyAaEcH
RT @DschlopesIsBack: No, the Lancet study was literally retracted for fraud. It was completely made up, yet peer reviewed and widely used…
RT @DschlopesIsBack: No, the Lancet study was literally retracted for fraud. It was completely made up, yet peer reviewed and widely used…
No, the Lancet study was literally retracted for fraud. It was completely made up, yet peer reviewed and widely used to "debunk" and stop the usage of hydroxychloroquine for Covid. I know that you are just now finding this out but please try to keep up.
@NewLauras @elonmusk @ZelenkoProtocol @ZelenkoZev You 100% believed and trusted this study. You are very likely just now finding out it was retracted for fraud. https://t.co/7GwpaTCHpn
@jonbingnj Have you heard for this Lancet scandal which kill hcq?! https://t.co/OPAru0qMlS. There are big metadata, the highest proof of science evidence. It is not study. It is all studies that are approved. https://t.co/eMemKfMl6p
@PierreKory “The very relevant and respected medical journal Lancett” ‘The Lancet’ lost all relevance and respect when they published the dodgiest, HCQ and macrolide study, (insert doctors’ names 🧐), then retracted this study, after the damage was done #C
@Silje_Schevig @DrAseemMalhotra Looks like there’s dozens and dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political? #repeal1986act https://t.co/zHd4mL7ogM 🧵 https://t.co/E0dIATBKPl
@ErrataRob How about The Lancet study that was retracted and debunked (because it used fake data) that tried to say HCQ was ineffective? https://t.co/PU8gpeYUF2
@elonmusk This was the study cited by Fauci and the media when showing that HCQ doesn't work. They LITERALLY used a RETRACTED study in order to get EUA for the mRNA . This is FRAUD. Jail time. https://t.co/xQ1wIDbpxr
This was the study cited by Fauci and the media when showing that HCQ doesn't work. They LITERALLY used a RETRACTED study in order to get EUA for the #mRNA This is FRAUD. Jail time. #FauciFiles #TwitterFiles https://t.co/HTjmiEX0qU
@NateWeymouth @Baric_Lab @frank_zelenko @TheLancet this was the study cited by Fauci and the media when showing that HCQ doesn't work. they LITERALLY used a retracted study in order to get EUA for the @pfizer vax. this is FRAUD. they need to be sued for
@LevantineTimes @Baric_Lab @frank_zelenko @TheLancet Here is the retracted study by the Lancet! They didn’t even have a standard dosage protocol administering HCQ and macrolide; Incompetent MDs that didn’t know what they were doing. Medical dosage errors
RT @BinaryUnicorn: @Liana53160 Because EUA couldn't be granted if a treatment existed. The Lancet published a smear on HCQ (below), which s…
@Liana53160 Because EUA couldn't be granted if a treatment existed. The Lancet published a smear on HCQ (below), which stopped the HCQ trials. Then, shortly after the HCQ trials were cancelled, the Lancet retracted the paper because nobody could find its f
Imho Another Lie by Fauci that cost Lives. Here’s the Bogus Lancet Study on Hydroxycloriquin that was retracted https://t.co/Dn7K2rZyCM
@DaveExplainsWhy @DoctorAnarchist @ScottAdamsSays Even the Lancet's reputation was tarnished in the Covid era. https://t.co/caNUnHHbZD https://t.co/mbCCusDTlZ
RT @iambackagain21: @Lorionafarm @MarioNawfal @tracybeanz https://t.co/hto3jpChWv Are top medical journals captured by Big Pharma ? Fraud…
@Lorionafarm @MarioNawfal @tracybeanz https://t.co/hto3jpChWv Are top medical journals captured by Big Pharma ? Fraud hydroxychloroquine negative papers retracted after exposure https://t.co/txiVA3Dr0e… https://t.co/hwKs8GIRnH https://t.co/LhaBK5JaX0
@swooshinc @StrohJulian I thought it was this one. Sorry. https://t.co/Yb588q5fKd
@Lesmatinsfcult @EtienneKlein @CEA_Officiel @centralesupelec @CNRS @Inserm #LancetGate. En 2020 on a pu publier dans le Lancet une étude frauduleuse basée sur des données inventées. Rétractée mais toujours impunie. Vous avez dit perte de confiance dans la
@BethTrice2 @LostMyDisguise @TomFitton Yep that's not a real scientific organization like The Lancet...https://t.co/T4F4nXELfH
RT @PEdziewski: @MariuszJagora Jak naprawdę powstają spreparowane/fałszywe artykuły To nie odpowiedzi są stronnicze, tylko pytania – efekt…
RT @PEdziewski: Zaufaj nauce !!! Jak naprawdę powstają spreparowane/fałszywe artykuły To nie odpowiedzi są stronnicze, tylko pytania – efek…
Zaufaj nauce !!! Jak naprawdę powstają spreparowane/fałszywe artykuły To nie odpowiedzi są stronnicze, tylko pytania – efekt finansowania – prof. David Michaels -https://t.co/mBIrxEEUsX https://t.co/jzK1Sr5rbO
@MariuszJagora Jak naprawdę powstają spreparowane/fałszywe artykuły To nie odpowiedzi są stronnicze, tylko pytania – efekt finansowania – prof. David Michaels -https://t.co/mBIrxEWvRx https://t.co/BrAgpNkru3
@MarioNawfal What do they make of the lack of quality standards of the most important scientific journals in the world, for example The Lancet. How can we as medical professionals trust such organisations? Has it always been this way or is this the end of
Trust is gone Pt 2. The Fraudulent trial actually Published in The Lancet that Ended HQ for Covid then was completely RETRACTED https://t.co/8xt1Z7oBpH
@LilOrwell1984 @RonnyJacksonTX @VenezuelanDiamo Here’s THE Trial published in The Lancet that Stopped all use of Hydroxycloriquin! By the way it was show to be totally Fraudulent and RETRACTED in full by The Lancet https://t.co/8xt1Z7o3A9
@kraster @ABridgen "Papers are assessed on their content first and foremost." And the ones which fit the narrative get approved, even if they are fraudulent, right? https://t.co/yO7u1pccuo
How about this Classic form “The Lancet” https://t.co/8xt1Z7o3A9
This is as bad as “The Lancet” publishing the Total Bogus Negative Study on Hydroxycloriquin to taint it as an effective treatment for COVID then RETRACTING IT https://t.co/8xt1Z7o3A9
We've detected a paper from Viruses that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/mYeMQvZ5BI Retracted paper: https://t.co/jaDkgRvLSc
@PhillyPharmaBoy @BritishBack @WHO @PeterHotez #Lancet retracted its paper condemning #Hydroxychloroquine a couple of weeks p the damage was done. #WHO didn't return to its 'trials,' though it halted them because of Lancet's disinformation. https://t.co
@TruthTalker22 @davidrich1 @FLSurgeonGen @TracyBethHoeg @TruthTalker22 @davidrich1 Let's take the fraudulent paper on Hydroxychloroquine endorsed by FDA as well as Anthony Fauci. https://t.co/nbj38cY8rY Please weigh in on this paper if you like to educate
RT @ChanceGardiner: 2. Lancet il 22 maggio 2020 pubblicò lo studio che "ha dimostrato che con l'lDROSSlCLOROCHlNA aumentava la mortalità",…
RT @ChanceGardiner: 2. Lancet il 22 maggio 2020 pubblicò lo studio che "ha dimostrato che con l'lDROSSlCLOROCHlNA aumentava la mortalità",…
RT @ChanceGardiner: 2. Lancet il 22 maggio 2020 pubblicò lo studio che "ha dimostrato che con l'lDROSSlCLOROCHlNA aumentava la mortalità",…
RT @ChanceGardiner: 5. Il 5 giugno i coautori Mandeep Mehra, Frank Ruschitzka e Amit Patel, si accorgono "improvvisamente" che i dati forni…
RT @mompursuetruth: @MD_PhD_ivermect @takavet1 ランセットといえば。ヒドロキシクロロキンをコロナ患者に投与したら死亡率増加したという論文。 これをきっかけに、ヒドロキシクロロキン使用禁止、入手も出来ない、処方したお医者様が免許剥奪…
RT @mompursuetruth: @MD_PhD_ivermect @takavet1 ランセットといえば。ヒドロキシクロロキンをコロナ患者に投与したら死亡率増加したという論文。 これをきっかけに、ヒドロキシクロロキン使用禁止、入手も出来ない、処方したお医者様が免許剥奪…