@17ThankQ @The_OJW @realDonaldTrump Remember the MSM freak out? Then this happened 😂 https://t.co/4skYb2PT5D
@GerBaron @Thomas_Binder In the last 3 yrs, toilet paper became more valuable than most peer-reviews. From this stinker, to the 2 Fauci used as an excuse to call for lockdowns, which were also retracted. Aka, peer-reviewed propaganda for pharma profit. h
We've detected a paper from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/LVw4v9ofWt Retracted paper: https://t.co/jaDkgRvLSc
That's a retracted paper you Muppet.
@dr_jon_l @naomirwolf I believe, if you look, you'll find a mountain of data saying otherwise. "Peer-reviewed" has been mostly garbage for the last 3 yrs, starting with this stinker where they overdosed patients. Did you believe it when it was publishe
We need a criminal investigation of who paid for this 2020 false Lancet study! Big Pharma who wanted emergency approval of their experimental genetic injections? With effective early treatment (se FLCCC), emergency approval had not been possible. https:/
RT @Ghostrider768: @ofcberu @foxiedoxie777 @_Truthsniper23 @RobbyRuark @MikeASperrazza @ChuckCallesto And then this happened? 😂 lancet r…
@ofcberu @foxiedoxie777 @_Truthsniper23 @RobbyRuark @MikeASperrazza @ChuckCallesto And then this happened? 😂 lancet retraction hydroxychloroquine https://t.co/4skYb2PT5D
@profnfenton @MartaBranco86 @TrialsiteN @TheLancet Never trust the Lancet! They published a study on Hydroxychloroquine as early treatment against covid based on false data that concluded it did not work. When they finally were forced to withdraw it, it wa
@harryjsisson Another jab help? https://t.co/4skYb2PT5D
@ksorbsinnrvoice @Nasty1Reborn @for_options Yeah. You do it, Teaser, remember when lying msm broadcasted lying state propaganda https://t.co/4skYb2PT5D
RT @Ghostrider768: @hyperman514 @AwakenedOutlaw @the_picketfence You were duped from the get go dumbass https://t.co/4skYb2PT5D
@hyperman514 @AwakenedOutlaw @the_picketfence You were duped from the get go dumbass https://t.co/4skYb2PT5D
@CKellyUAP also this retracted study by @TheLancet https://t.co/HTjmiEWsBm
Le Prof. Raoult chez TPMP - corruption et conflicts d'intérêt depuis 3 ans et la fameuse étude frauduleuse du Lancet sur l'hydroxychloroquine - rappelons-le : "retracted" LANCET ⬇️ https://t.co/kKqQubHSw1 https://t.co/BAcdZiJwi8
@Fynnderella1 @P_McCulloughMD Yup, seems like there’s dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Political? #repeal1986act https://t.co/zHd4mL6Qre
@JamesOKeefeIII U might find this interesting… https://t.co/QYQ0mdb4MG https://t.co/jQKcoEHg4K Small bio w very promising cure for Lung disease/ARDS under attack involving: Uof Miami Niel Riordan Dr. Amit Patel 👇 https://t.co/pF9fY0s7rc https://t.co/
@jmanalich Y donde esta el estudio retractado?. Cuando ocurrió lo mismo con la HCQ no publicaste nada en Twitter y aquí esta el link del estudio retractado. (es evidente lo imparcial que eres en tus juicios) https://t.co/OzgUuSB7fb
@MikkoKorhonen12 @jekkukissa @SallaLindstrom @huhtalajvt Taitaa olla vielä sama mikä oli varma ettei korona lähtenyt laboratoriosta. Ja joutunut useita tutkimuksia vetämään pois koska väärää tietoa. Anna joku luotettava lähde https://t.co/eJMglkJG4Z
RT @carolina_bonita: RETRACTED: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational re…
RT @carolina_bonita: RETRACTED: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational re…
RETRACTED: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis https://t.co/qEgNElBcri https://t.co/BqUivu5Jvk
@instrumenthull All the "best" scientists agree. Like this person talking about their "awesome" Lancet study. https://t.co/bYw35mzydx The study's here: https://t.co/FLr9bH1Swf (retraction notice: https://t.co/5Pf8H5PZ2d)
@HonestAbeSpeak @PoeBrianL @MericaBB @Rockslovak @mtaibbi That makes it legit to you? In 2023? Seriously? Remember when The Lancet was considered legit? That's over, woke infested it, and it started in universities, who now have segregated graduation c
@MarkChangizi Fraudulent science that smeared repurposed antivirals was fast-tracked. /3 https://t.co/ompGor9QMu
@Frank12Campbell @yeahnaa333 @Johnincarlisle @YouTube https://t.co/ab6NsoDqQm this is the retracted one
@MathieuMolimard @SFPT_fr @ansm @Sante_Gouv @Clara_Locher @1APariente @DrugsSafe Parlez-vous de cette étude : https://t.co/okSaonjud2
@LoLoWarn @Arkancideisreal J'en ai un autre : https://t.co/bnqFXL78dX
We've detected a paper from Social Media - Risks and Opportunities [Working Title] that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/oQM0qtVtAm Retracted paper: https://t.co/jaDkgRvLSc
We've detected a paper that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/NqLHktcXuo Retracted paper: https://t.co/jaDkgRvLSc
@SamTLowry @srmgin1 @thecoastguy Misinformation. The Lancet study disqualifying HCl has been retracted (many articles and news reports) https://t.co/VlmoFAYS7E.
@georgia6th Not to be confused by the RETRACTED and FRAUDULENT study by @TheLancet which was STILL used by the mainstream media to "disprove" effectiveness of HCQ. https://t.co/HTjmiEWsBm
@Cole14880872 @mpc_xetts @santo30968622 @stkirsch Bingo. The Lancet was ground zero for the degradation of peer reviewed, where they had the balls to publish a study that literally overdosed patients to discredit HCQ. They're all 1-ply now. https://t.co/
@Jikkyleaks @TheLancet The Lancet has no credibility. https://t.co/x9ELlfxUHZ
@profnfenton @TheLancet They lost any and all sense of respectability after this fiasco. https://t.co/x9ELlfxUHZ
@barriere_dr @AlbinMichel Vous vous voulez dire que des revues comme Le Lancet et BMJ c'est mieux? Va falloir vius renseignez sur la validite des etudes scientifiques. Vrai un jour, fausse un autre. https://t.co/mWfwb69eaN
RT @calpete7: @Fisherlady111 May, 2020, the worst i had come across. About the same time in june when it was retracted I read about British…
RT @calpete7: @Fisherlady111 May, 2020, the worst i had come across. About the same time in june when it was retracted I read about British…
@de_typhus @MartinNeil9 @TheLancet 100% fake. https://t.co/58uDnRELmo
@GYamey Here is an identical example: https://t.co/QJoMm9tIno
@NickAPappas @KelemenCari @elonmusk @TheChiefNerd Found the simp for The Establishment! Always trying to shut people down with misinformation. Would you believe it if it was published in The Lancet? https://t.co/d15Wd4SPLe
@AlastairMcA30 Certainly not the first time that such an act has been carried out. https://t.co/7skU7Fp2J5
@SergejKoch @HarveyWall15 @SaiKate108 @GeorgeMonbiot Here's a study. Where they intentionally overdosed patients to make HCQ look bad. Because if there were viable alternatives they couldn't EUA the jabs. https://t.co/aSzSQvo4Z4
@politicus2022 @55Bellechasse Pas de temps à perdre avec autant de mauvaise foi ! Il est beau le factchecking !!! 😂 https://t.co/W8K8hYOquw https://t.co/leEOyGvxvj https://t.co/UX84xWhClN https://t.co/tOvLrRH41s ...
@Greenleopard49 @1Quetzalcoatl1 @Jknez217 My point is $cience, far and wide as far as the humans go is wrought with nefarious, for profit interests who can remove licenses of dissenters and purchase humanity through unelected buyable force. This wouldn’t b
Pois... mas sobre o The Lancet não podemos esquecer isto... https://t.co/L7QZC29RV1
@ClaytonMorris About The Lancet, remember this https://t.co/L7QZC29RV1
@LynneJordanActs @VigilantFox @drcole12 Na champ, they didn’t know they were committing manslaughter, they just did as they were told and denying early treatment caused death as well. And that hydroxy dump was based off a fraudulent study that was publishe
We've detected a paper from Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/roOmzTATbB Retracted paper: https://t.co/jaDkgRvLSc
@nelsonepega Trump. Hcq. https://t.co/CC9XzzXQiB, https://t.co/2mD72EVUcf, https://t.co/mmSHMMnIRA, https://t.co/9rDTKQmVHM, He even read dr Zelenko letter about hcq. And then they shout him with this study: https://t.co/OPAru0qewk. And kill many.
@shmuelcshapira and yet, they still conducted this study and the media ran with it...and the @TheLancet did not correct them https://t.co/HTjmiEWsBm
RT @ultrawave5: @EllisBallentine @vaxxdeath @Alisonnj @realstewpeters Fail: Had to discredit alternative treatments - so compromised big n…
@EllisBallentine @vaxxdeath @Alisonnj @realstewpeters Fail: Had to discredit alternative treatments - so compromised big name publications out right lied - and quietly retracted after clearing the way for mRNA. https://t.co/2586GhQP3n
@TaraBull808 Can't have an Emergency Use Authorization if there's alternatives available, like the one below Looks like there’s dozens-too many to count-of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political? #repeal1986act https://t.
@WesElyMD It works for me and for my family. Like a charm! You didn’t heard that hcq doesn’t work too!??? Funny. https://t.co/OPAru0qewk
@LarryDeLuca @JJJJenniferrrr2 @CKellyUAP Bullshit, you’re citing a fraudulent study that was retracted by the Lancet because it was fraudulent. Stop spreading lies. The vaccine kills and maim a way more people you half wit. https://t.co/nzDK2mJmXD https:/
@israelradioguy @ExpertPharmacy @EndWokeness Conversely, the @TheLancet conducted a deliberately fraudulent study on HCQ, with lethal doses...which the media ran with and which the Lancet the retracted...but not before governments dismissed HCQ...just so t
@mkeulemans @TheLancet @volkskrant Deze @Lancet ?? Foute informatie geplaatst, is onder grote druk van medische experts herzien!!! https://t.co/0aAKqrRdSB
@CostaPtitdragon “The funny thing about regret…is that it’s better to regret something you have done, than to regret something you haven’t…” https://t.co/anYFjIhgQe
RT @DonnoyDarko: @TiSteveg @RobertKennedyJr The fake study that literally overdosed patients to discredit it because, Trump, that they had…
@lweisenthal @TinaHawkridge @AlexBerenson @DrJohnCampbell3 My favorite peer reviewed study is this one. Real revaluation. https://t.co/OPAru0qewk
@Tickerb11111 @MariamAzeb @IanCopeland5 The same lancet that defiled itself with publishing then retracing hydroxychloroquine article, the EUA of vax is only possible as a result of ‘supposedly’ not having alternative treatments, they lied, ppl died, and
RT @DonnoyDarko: @TiSteveg @RobertKennedyJr The fake study that literally overdosed patients to discredit it because, Trump, that they had…
RT @DonnoyDarko: @TiSteveg @RobertKennedyJr The fake study that literally overdosed patients to discredit it because, Trump, that they had…
@TiSteveg @RobertKennedyJr The fake study that literally overdosed patients to discredit it because, Trump, that they had to retract. Yeah, I remember it, and same. https://t.co/aSzSQvo4Z4
Remember the @TheLancet retracting their article https://t.co/3737Pjg4v5
RT @DonnoyDarko: @SaiKate108 Ground zero for the rot, The Lancet - they intentionally overdosed patients to disprove HCQ because, Trump, bu…
RT @DonnoyDarko: @SaiKate108 Ground zero for the rot, The Lancet - they intentionally overdosed patients to disprove HCQ because, Trump, bu…
@SaiKate108 Ground zero for the rot, The Lancet - they intentionally overdosed patients to disprove HCQ because, Trump, but published it anyway. And it worked. https://t.co/aSzSQvo4Z4
RT @normanpie: Dla ciekawych, Tu są linki do prac, które dyskutuję powyżej. https://t.co/AZNvdkfBTl https://t.co/US4Z9DfZUO
RT @normanpie: Dla ciekawych, Tu są linki do prac, które dyskutuję powyżej. https://t.co/AZNvdkfBTl https://t.co/US4Z9DfZUO
RT @normanpie: Dla ciekawych, Tu są linki do prac, które dyskutuję powyżej. https://t.co/AZNvdkfBTl https://t.co/US4Z9DfZUO
Dla ciekawych, Tu są linki do prac, które dyskutuję powyżej. https://t.co/AZNvdkfBTl https://t.co/US4Z9DfZUO
@wargonm Faites-vous plus confiance à l'analyse faite par Mehra et publiée dans The Lancet (avant d'être rétractée)*, ou à des essais comme "Solidarity" et "Recovery" dont le "parti pris" interroge (explications dans doc joint) ? *https://t.co/N87cTLNSMY
@margitvea Madsen saboterte bruk av plaquenil på bakgrunn av denne artikkelene som Lancet måtte trekke da den var forfalsket. Han uttrykte seg i ren panikk i norske medier om at plaquenil gav hjerteproblemer. Positiv forskning om plaquenil kalte han søppel
@Lrover16 @withmalice @IanCopeland5 Why are you such a dork? Yes they’re not hard to find. Do u want me to get you a blood sample of the authors too? Did that change your mind any? Of course not. No shill ever budges even when pharma themselves says they’r
@stella_immanuel Thank you for your no nonsense and your bravery. https://t.co/g9p7oG5MDB
@schillerclan @ZelenkoZev @Twitthealth2023 And the Lancet Journal has retracted all the lies they spewed. Dr. Zelenko is a true hero and saviour. God Bless you Dr. Zelenko and R.I.P. https://t.co/g9p7oG5MDB
Remember when the MSM and the Gov’t fake Dr’s and Pharma demonized real Dr’s who promoted HCQ as a therapeutic against Covid? #neurombergtrials #retracted https://t.co/K0DlssCnuY https://t.co/j6qeuI3lHO
@nupoint21 @BilsonhBilson @CKellyUAP Here’s the link champ https://t.co/2l5YcjYVET
@Jenwunder @IanCopeland5 I think it was this one. https://t.co/Ol5ppYj7Pe
@Victorshi2020 Looks like there’s dozens-too many to count- of retractions on H*C*Q in The Lancet med journal. Why is that, political? #repeal1986act https://t.co/zHd4mL7ogM fauci in deep shit, 1 of 2 🧵
@jodeebean @mckeeana @JoJoFromJerz The Lancet is no longer a reputable publication. Their article from May 2020 (later retracted, but too late) stated that Hydroxychloroquine was ineffective or harmful in treating C19. Despite retraction, hundreds of othe
We've detected a paper from Health Research Policy and Systems that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/oxEAmgTWQo Retracted paper: https://t.co/jaDkgRvLSc
@DaveExplainsWhy @ScottAdamsSays Here ya go? https://t.co/lKPowKmufY