You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Design and Validation of CRISPR/Cas9 Systems for Targeted Gene Modification in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 1 |
| Book title |
In Vitro Mutagenesis
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6472-7_1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6470-3, 978-1-4939-6472-7
|
| Authors |
Ciaran M. Lee, Haibao Zhu, Timothy H. Davis, Harshahardhan Deshmukh, Gang Bao |
| Editors |
Andrew Reeves |
| Abstract |
The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a powerful tool for precision genome editing. The ability to accurately modify genomic DNA in situ with single nucleotide precision opens up new possibilities for not only basic research but also biotechnology applications and clinical translation. In this chapter, we outline the procedures for design, screening, and validation of CRISPR/Cas9 systems for targeted modification of coding sequences in the human genome and how to perform genome editing in induced pluripotent stem cells with high efficiency and specificity. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,764,740
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,628
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,763
of 420,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#187
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.