↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic Control

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Organ-Specific Cancer Metabolism and Its Potential for Therapy
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
559 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Organ-Specific Cancer Metabolism and Its Potential for Therapy
Chapter number 10
Book title
Metabolic Control
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/164_2015_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-929804-7, 978-3-31-929806-1
Authors

Ilaria Elia, Roberta Schmieder, Stefan Christen, Sarah-Maria Fendt, Elia, Ilaria, Schmieder, Roberta, Christen, Stefan, Fendt, Sarah-Maria

Abstract

Targeting the metabolism of cancer cells has the potential to lead to major advances in tumor therapy. Numerous promising metabolic drug targets have been identified. Yet, it has emerged that there is no singular metabolism that defines the oncogenic state of the cell. Rather, the metabolism of cancer cells is a function of the requirements of a tumor. Hence, the tissue of origin, the (epi)genetic drivers, the aberrant signaling, and the microenvironment all together define these metabolic requirements. In this chapter we discuss in light of (epi)genetic, signaling, and environmental factors the diversity in cancer metabolism based on triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, early- and late-stage prostate cancer, and liver cancer. These types of cancer all display distinct and partially opposing metabolic behaviors (e.g., Warburg versus reverse Warburg metabolism). Yet, for each of the cancers, their distinct metabolism supports the oncogenic phenotype. Finally, we will assess the therapeutic potential of metabolism based on the concepts of metabolic normalization and metabolic depletion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 559 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 547 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 110 20%
Researcher 94 17%
Student > Master 88 16%
Student > Bachelor 77 14%
Other 37 7%
Other 85 15%
Unknown 68 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 104 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 83 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 48 9%
Chemistry 24 4%
Other 96 17%
Unknown 79 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,858,568
of 25,463,091 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#146
of 686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,030
of 280,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them