↓ Skip to main content

T follicular Helper Cells

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'T follicular Helper Cells'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Identification of mouse T follicular helper cells by flow cytometry.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Identification of follicular T helper cells in tissue sections.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Tracking early T follicular helper cell differentiation in vivo.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Tracking by Flow Cytometry Antigen-Specific Follicular Helper T Cells in Wild-Type Animals After Protein Vaccination
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Retroviral Vector Expression in TCR Transgenic CD4(+) T Cells.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Two-photon microscopy for imaging germinal centers and T follicular helper cells.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 In Vivo Induction of T-Follicular Helper Cells by Modulation of Regulatory T Cell Function
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Assessing T Follicular Helper Cell Function In Vivo: Antigen-Specific B Cell Response to Hapten and Affinity Maturation
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 The SWHEL System for High-Resolution Analysis of In Vivo Antigen-Specific T-Dependent B Cell Responses
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Triggering Positive Selection of Germinal Center B Cells by Antigen Targeting to DEC-205
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Detection of Mouse Natural Killer T Follicular Helper (NKTFH) Cells by Flow Cytometry.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Identification of Foxp3+ T Follicular Regulatory (Tfr) Cells by Flow Cytometry
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 In Vitro Assay to Sensitively Measure TFR Suppressive Capacity and TFH Stimulation of B Cell Responses.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Flow Cytometric Detection and Isolation of Human Tonsil or Lymph Node T Follicular Helper Cells
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Human tfh and tfr cells: identification and assessment of their migration potential.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Analysis of human blood memory T follicular helper subsets.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Flow Cytometric Analysis of Circulating Follicular Helper T (Tfh) and Follicular Regulatory T (Tfr) Populations in Human Blood
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Quantifying Helper Cell Function of Human TFH Cells In Vitro.
Attention for Chapter 18: Quantifying Helper Cell Function of Human TFH Cells In Vitro.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Quantifying Helper Cell Function of Human TFH Cells In Vitro.
Chapter number 18
Book title
T follicular Helper Cells
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2498-1_18
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2497-4, 978-1-4939-2498-1
Authors

Chevalier, Nina, Nina Chevalier

Editors

Marion Espéli, Michelle Linterman

Abstract

Blood-circulating CXCR5(+) CD4(+) T cells and T follicular helper (TFH) cells, which participate in germinal center (GC) reactions within secondary lymphoid organs, are specialized in providing help to B cells. This chapter describes ways to isolate TFH-like cells out of peripheral blood or tonsils and to quantify their B cell helper function. This comprises different co-culture approaches of TFH-like cells and B cells and the evaluation of their capacity to induce immunoglobulin secretion and plasma cell differentiation. In addition, B cell helper function of CD4 T cells can be estimated indirectly by quantifying the expression of B cell helper cytokines and co-stimulatory and TFH-associated molecules.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 28%
Researcher 5 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 5 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,299,108
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,914
of 13,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,920
of 353,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#636
of 997 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 997 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.