↓ Skip to main content

Transient Receptor Potential Canonical Channels and Brain Diseases

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: TRPC Channels and Parkinson’s Disease
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
TRPC Channels and Parkinson’s Disease
Chapter number 8
Book title
Transient Receptor Potential Canonical Channels and Brain Diseases
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-1088-4_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-241086-0, 978-9-40-241088-4, 978-9-40-241086-0, 978-9-40-241088-4
Authors

Pramod Sukumaran, Yuyang Sun, Anne Schaar, Senthil Selvaraj, Brij B. Singh, Sukumaran, Pramod, Sun, Yuyang, Schaar, Anne, Selvaraj, Senthil, Singh, Brij B.

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder, which involves degeneration of dopaminergic neurons that are present in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) region. Many factors have been identified that could lead to Parkinson's disease; however, almost all of them are directly or indirectly dependent on Ca(2+) signaling. Importantly, though disturbances in Ca(2+) homeostasis have been implicated in Parkinson's disease and other neuronal diseases, the identity of the calcium channel remains elusive. Members of the transient receptor potential canonical (TRPC) channel family have been identified as a new class of Ca(2+) channels, and it could be anticipated that these channels could play important roles in neurodegenerative diseases, especially in PD. Thus, in this chapter we have entirely focused on TRPC channels and elucidated its role in PD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Professor 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,966,001
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#461
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,263
of 421,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#38
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.