↓ Skip to main content

Transient Receptor Potential Canonical Channels and Brain Diseases

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: TRPC Channels and Mental Disorders
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
TRPC Channels and Mental Disorders
Chapter number 12
Book title
Transient Receptor Potential Canonical Channels and Brain Diseases
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-1088-4_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-241086-0, 978-9-40-241088-4, 978-9-40-241086-0, 978-9-40-241088-4
Authors

Karina Griesi-Oliveira, Angela May Suzuki, Alysson Renato Muotri, Griesi-Oliveira, Karina, Suzuki, Angela May, Muotri, Alysson Renato

Abstract

Transient receptor potential canonical (TRPC) channels mediate the influx of different types of cations through the cell membrane and are involved in many functions of the organism. Evidences of involvement of TRPC channels in neuronal development suggest that this family of proteins might play a role in certain neurological disorders. As reported, knockout mice for different TRPC channels show alterations in neuronal morphological and functional parameters, with behavioral abnormalities, such as in exploratory and social behaviors. Although mutations in TRPC channels could be related to mental/neurological disorders, there are only a few cases reported in literature, indicating that this correlation should be further explored. Nonetheless, other functional evidences support the implication of these channels in neurological diseases. In this chapter, we summarize the main findings relating TRPC channels to neurological disorders, such as autism spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, and intellectual disability among others.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Psychology 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,459,013
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,512
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,209
of 421,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#235
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.