↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial Protein Secretion Systems

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Bacterial Protein Secretion Systems'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Identification of Protein Secretion Systems in Bacterial Genomes Using MacSyFinder
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Protein Sorting Prediction
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Cell Fractionation
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Defining Lipoprotein Localisation by Fluorescence Microscopy
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Identification of Lipoproteins Using Globomycin and Radioactive Palmitate
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Defining Membrane Protein Localization by Isopycnic Density Gradients
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Cell Surface Exposure
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Probing Inner Membrane Protein Topology by Proteolysis
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Mapping of Membrane Protein Topology by Substituted Cysteine Accessibility Method (SCAM™)
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Defining Membrane Protein Topology Using pho-lac Reporter Fusions
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 In Vivo and In Vitro Protein–Peptidoglycan Interactions
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Measure of Peptidoglycan Hydrolase Activity
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Protein–Protein Interaction: Bacterial Two-Hybrid
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Protein–Protein Interactions: Yeast Two-Hybrid System
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Protein–Protein Interactions: Cytology Two-Hybrid
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Fusion Reporter Approaches to Monitoring Transmembrane Helix Interactions in Bacterial Membranes
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Protein–Protein Interactions: Co-Immunoprecipitation
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Protein–Protein Interaction: Tandem Affinity Purification in Bacteria
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Site-Directed and Time-Resolved Photocrosslinking in Cells Metabolically Labeled with Radioisotopes
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Protein–Protein Interactions: Pull-Down Assays
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Protein–Protein Interactions: Surface Plasmon Resonance
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Assessing Energy-Dependent Protein Conformational Changes in the TonB System
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Defining Assembly Pathways by Fluorescence Microscopy
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Large Complexes: Cloning Strategy, Production, and Purification
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Shearing and Enrichment of Extracellular Type IV Pili
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Blue Native PAGE Analysis of Bacterial Secretion Complexes
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 In Situ Imaging of Bacterial Secretion Systems by Electron Cryotomography
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Structural Analysis of Protein Complexes by Cryo Electron Microscopy
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Bacterial Filamentous Appendages Investigated by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Energy Requirements for Protein Secretion via the Flagellar Type III Secretion System
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 Identification of Effectors: Precipitation of Supernatant Material
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32 Screening for Secretion of the Type VI Secretion System Protein Hcp by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Colony Blot
  34. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 33 Effector Translocation: Cya Reporter Assay
  35. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 34 Monitoring Effector Translocation using the TEM-1 Beta-Lactamase Reporter System
  36. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 35 Effector Translocation Assay: Differential Solubilization
  37. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 36 Quantitative Determination of Anti-bacterial Activity During Bacterial Co-culture
  38. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 37 Erratum to: Bacterial Filamentous Appendages Investigated by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy
Attention for Chapter 10: Defining Membrane Protein Topology Using pho-lac Reporter Fusions
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Defining Membrane Protein Topology Using pho-lac Reporter Fusions
Chapter number 10
Book title
Bacterial Protein Secretion Systems
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7033-9_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7031-5, 978-1-4939-7033-9
Authors

Gouzel Karimova, Daniel Ladant, Karimova, Gouzel, Ladant, Daniel

Editors

Laure Journet, Eric Cascales

Abstract

Experimental determination of membrane protein topology can be achieved using various techniques. Here we present the pho-lac dual reporter system, a simple, convenient, and reliable tool to analyze the topology of membrane proteins in vivo. The system is based on the use of two topological markers with complementary properties, the Escherichia coli β-galactosidase LacZ, which is active in the cytoplasm, and the E. coli alkaline phosphatase PhoA, which is active in the bacterial periplasm. Specifically, in this pho-lac gene system, the reporter molecule is a chimera composed of the mature PhoA that is in frame with the β-galactosidase α-peptide, LacZα. Hence, when targeted to the periplasm, the PhoA-LacZα dual reporter displays high alkaline phosphatase activity but no β-galactosidase activity. Conversely, when located in the cytoplasm, PhoA-LacZα has no phosphatase activity but exhibits high β-galactosidase activity in E. coli cells expressing the ω fragment of LacZ, LacZω (via the α-complementation phenomenon). The dual nature of the PhoA-LacZα reporter allows a simple way to normalize both enzymatic activities to obtain readily interpretable information about the subcellular location of the fusion site between the membrane protein under study and the reporter. In addition, the PhoA-LacZα reporter permits utilization of dual-indicator agar plates to easily discriminate between colonies bearing cytoplasmic fusions, periplasmic fusions, or out-of-frame fusions. In total, the phoA-lacZα fusion reporter approach is a straightforward and rather inexpensive method of characterizing the topology of membrane proteins in vivo.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 56%
Computer Science 1 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,334
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,785
of 314,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#31
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.