↓ Skip to main content

Low-Load High Volume Resistance Exercise Stimulates Muscle Protein Synthesis More Than High-Load Low Volume Resistance Exercise in Young Men

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
363 X users
facebook
46 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
7 Redditors
pinterest
1 Pinner
video
17 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
403 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
860 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low-Load High Volume Resistance Exercise Stimulates Muscle Protein Synthesis More Than High-Load Low Volume Resistance Exercise in Young Men
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas A. Burd, Daniel W. D. West, Aaron W. Staples, Philip J. Atherton, Jeff M. Baker, Daniel R. Moore, Andrew M. Holwerda, Gianni Parise, Michael J. Rennie, Steven K. Baker, Stuart M. Phillips

Abstract

We aimed to determine the effect of resistance exercise intensity (%1 repetition maximum-1RM) and volume on muscle protein synthesis, anabolic signaling, and myogenic gene expression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 363 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 860 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 10 1%
United States 10 1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Norway 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Other 10 1%
Unknown 808 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 143 17%
Student > Master 141 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 118 14%
Researcher 90 10%
Professor 50 6%
Other 168 20%
Unknown 150 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 298 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 96 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 5%
Other 81 9%
Unknown 176 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 522. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2023.
All research outputs
#49,341
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#817
of 225,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71
of 106,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4
of 809 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 809 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.