You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Monitoring Phage Biopanning by Next-Generation Sequencing
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 26 |
Book title |
Phage Display
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7447-4_26 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7446-7, 978-1-4939-7447-4
|
Authors |
Vaisman-Mentesh, Anna, Wine, Yariv, Anna Vaisman-Mentesh, Yariv Wine |
Abstract |
Phage display has enabled the rapid isolation of antigen-specific antibodies from combinatorial libraries of the variable heavy chain gene (VH) and variable light chain gene (VL). The method is based on genetic engineering of bacteriophages and repeated rounds of antigen-guided selection by phage biopanning.Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) coupled with bioinformatics are powerful tools for analyzing the large number of DNA sequences present in an immune library.Here, we describe a method that demonstrates how NGS analysis enhances phage biopanning of complex antibody libraries as well as facilitates the antibody discovery process. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 23% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,576,001
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,962
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,961
of 331,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#33
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.