↓ Skip to main content

Updates on Clostridium difficile in Europe

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 13: Non-human C. difficile Reservoirs and Sources: Animals, Food, Environment
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Non-human C. difficile Reservoirs and Sources: Animals, Food, Environment
Chapter number 13
Book title
Updates on Clostridium difficile in Europe
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72799-8_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-972798-1, 978-3-31-972799-8
Authors

Cristina Rodriguez Diaz, Christian Seyboldt, Maja Rupnik, Rodriguez Diaz, Cristina, Seyboldt, Christian, Rupnik, Maja

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is ubiquitous and is found in humans, animals and in variety of environments. The substantial overlap of ribotypes between all three main reservoirs suggests the extensive transmissions. Here we give the overview of European studies investigating farm, companion and wild animals, food and environments including water, soil, sediment, waste water treatment plants, biogas plants, air and households. Studies in Europe are more numerous especially in last couple of years, but are still fragmented in terms of countries, animal species or type of environment covered. Soil seem to be the habitat of divergent unusual lineages of C. difficile. But the most important aspect of animals and environment is their role in C. difficile transmissions and their potential as a source for human infection is discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 28 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 9 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 34 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,461,148
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,986
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,193
of 442,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#197
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.