↓ Skip to main content

Computational Systems Biology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Computational Systems Biology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 DNA Sequencing Data Analysis
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Transcriptome Sequencing: RNA-Seq
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Capture Hybridization of Long-Range DNA Fragments for High-Throughput Sequencing
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 The Introduction and Clinical Application of Cell-Free Tumor DNA
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Bioinformatics Analysis for Cell-Free Tumor DNA Sequencing Data
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 An Overview of Genome-Wide Association Studies
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Integrative Analysis of Omics Big Data
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 The Reconstruction and Analysis of Gene Regulatory Networks
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Differential Coexpression Network Analysis for Gene Expression Data
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 iSeq: Web-Based RNA-seq Data Analysis and Visualization
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Revisit of Machine Learning Supported Biological and Biomedical Studies
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Identifying Interactions Between Long Noncoding RNAs and Diseases Based on Computational Methods
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Survey of Computational Approaches for Prediction of DNA-Binding Residues on Protein Surfaces
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Computational Prediction of Protein O-GlcNAc Modification
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Machine Learning-Based Modeling of Drug Toxicity
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Metabolomics: A High-Throughput Platform for Metabolite Profile Exploration
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Single-Cell Protein Assays: A Review
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Data Analysis in Single-Cell Transcriptome Sequencing
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Applications of Single-Cell Sequencing for Multiomics
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Progress on Diagnosis of Tuberculous Meningitis
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Insights of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with Development of Genomic Investigation
Attention for Chapter 15: Machine Learning-Based Modeling of Drug Toxicity
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Machine Learning-Based Modeling of Drug Toxicity
Chapter number 15
Book title
Computational Systems Biology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7717-8_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7716-1, 978-1-4939-7717-8
Authors

Jing Lu, Dong Lu, Zunyun Fu, Mingyue Zheng, Xiaomin Luo, Lu, Jing, Lu, Dong, Fu, Zunyun, Zheng, Mingyue, Luo, Xiaomin

Abstract

Toxicity is an important reason for the failure of drug research and development (R&D). The traditional experimental testings for chemical toxicity profile are costly and time-consuming. Therefore, it is attractive to develop the effective and accurate alternatives, such as in silico prediction models. In this review, we discuss the practical use of some prediction models on three toxicity end points, including acute toxicity, carcinogenicity, and inhibition of the human ether-a-go-go-related gene ion channel (hERG). Special emphasis is put on the machine learning methods for developing in silico models, and their advantages and weaknesses are discussed. We conclude that machine learning methods are valuable for helping the process of designing new candidates with low toxicity in drug R&D studies. In the future, much still needs to be done to understand more completely the biological mechanisms for toxicity and to develop more accurate prediction models to screen compounds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Researcher 5 13%
Other 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Chemistry 3 8%
Computer Science 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 19 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,495,840
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,391
of 13,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,816
of 442,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#596
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.