↓ Skip to main content

Regulatory B Cells

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Regulatory B Cells'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Purification and Immunophenotypic Characterization of Murine MZ and T2-MZP Cells
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Purification and Immune Phenotyping of B-1 Cells from Body Cavities of Mice
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Purification and Immunophenotypic Characterization of Murine B10 B Cells
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Purification and Immunophenotypic Characterization of Human B Cells with Regulatory Functions
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 IL-10 Detection in Murine B Cells: Pros and Cons of the Different Techniques
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 TGF-β Detection and Measurement in Murine B Cells: Pros and Cons of the Different Techniques
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Characterization and Activity of Fas Ligand Producing CD5(+) B Cells.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Utilization of a Lentiviral System for the Generation of B Cells with Regulatory Properties
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Ex Vivo Generation of Murine IL-10-Producing B Cells by Fusokines.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Toll-like receptor ligation for the induction of regulatory B cells.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 The Generation of Regulatory B Cells by Helminth Parasites
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Use of cocultures for the study of cellular interactions influencing B cell regulatory functions.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Regulatory B Cells in Experimental Mouse Models of Arthritis
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Regulatory B Cells in Mouse Models of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Regulatory B cells in allergic airways disease and asthma.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Regulatory B Cells in Mouse Models of Intestinal Inflammation
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Regulatory B Cells in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE).
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Regulatory B cells, helminths, and multiple sclerosis.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Generation and identification of tumor-evoked regulatory B cells.
Attention for Chapter 12: Use of cocultures for the study of cellular interactions influencing B cell regulatory functions.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Use of cocultures for the study of cellular interactions influencing B cell regulatory functions.
Chapter number 12
Book title
Regulatory B Cells
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1161-5_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-1160-8, 978-1-4939-1161-5
Authors

Francesca Mion, Federica Benvenuti, Carlo Pucillo, Gaetano Vitale

Abstract

Many immunological processes are contextually controlled by complex interactions among different cell types. Several studies have shown that B cells produce the immune regulatory cytokine IL-10 in response to different external stimuli but also to immune-mediated signals. Endogenous signals that derive from the cross talk between B lymphocytes and other cells of the immune system can affect IL-10 production by B cells in both physiological and pathological conditions. With the aim to provide a guide for the study of how partner cells can induce IL-10-producing B cells, here we describe the protocols to investigate IL-10 production at a single cell level in a dendritic cell-B cell coculture in vitro system. These methods are a proof of concept that can be easily extrapolated and adapted to the study of the interaction between B cells and other immune cell types.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 2 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,302,478
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,316
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,020
of 305,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#200
of 597 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 597 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.