↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic Biology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 16: Production of a Human Cell Line with a Plant Chromosome
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Production of a Human Cell Line with a Plant Chromosome
Chapter number 16
Book title
Synthetic Biology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7795-6_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7794-9, 978-1-4939-7795-6
Authors

Naoki Wada, Yasuhiro Kazuki, Kanako Kazuki, Toshiaki Inoue, Kiichi Fukui, Mitsuo Oshimura, Wada, Naoki, Kazuki, Yasuhiro, Kazuki, Kanako, Inoue, Toshiaki, Fukui, Kiichi, Oshimura, Mitsuo

Abstract

It is a major challenge in biology to know whether chromosome functions of replication, segregation, gene expression, inheritance, etc. are conserved among evolutionary distant organisms where common structural features are maintained. Establishment of hybrid cell lines between evolutionary distant organisms, such as humans and plants, would be one of the promising synthetic approaches to study the evolutionary conservation of chromosome functions. In this chapter, we describe the protocol for successful establishment of human cell lines with a functional plant chromosome. Systematic analyses of hybrid cells will facilitate the evolutionary study of organisms with respect to chromosome functions. It will also provide a basic platform for genome writing and construction of chromosomal shuttle vectors .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,475,442
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,627
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,716
of 441,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#348
of 1,497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.