↓ Skip to main content

Teratogenicity Testing

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Teratogenicity Testing'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 An Overview of Teratology
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Teratology Study Guidelines: An Overview
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Biological Concerns on the Selection of Animal Models for Teratogenic Testing
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 The Validated Embryonic Stem Cell Test with Murine Embryonic Stem Cells
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to Assess Developmental Toxicity in the Osteogenic Lineage
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Chick Embryonic Cardiomyocyte Micromass System for Assessing Developmental Cardiotoxicity of Drugs
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Flow Cytometry to Evaluate Potential Developmental Toxicants in the Embryonic Stem Cell
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Morphology-Based Whole Embryo Culture for Developmental Toxicity of Drugs
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Western Blot Methodologies for Analysis of In Vitro Protein Expression Induced by Teratogenic Agents
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Manipulation of MicroRNAs in Cultured Mouse Embryos: Applications for Developmental Toxicology
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Insights into the Phenotypic and Behavioral Effects of Teratogenic Drugs in Caenorhabditis elegans
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Effect of Teratogens on Development of Drosophila melanogaster
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Cellular Responses in Drosophila melanogaster Following Teratogen Exposure
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Behavioral Teratogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Evaluation of Teratogenicity of Pharmaceuticals Using FETAX
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Histological Observation of Teratogenic Phenotypes Induced in Frog Embryo Assays
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Visualization of Gene Expression Patterns by In Situ Hybridization on Early Stages of Development of Xenopus laevis
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Analysis of Lethality and Malformations During Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Development
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 General Whole-Mount Immunohistochemistry of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Embryos and Larvae Protocol
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Geometric Morphometrics as a Tool to Evaluate Teratogenic Effects in Zebrafish (Danio rerio)
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Live Metabolic Profile Analysis of Zebrafish Embryos Using a Seahorse XF 24 Extracellular Flux Analyzer
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Behavioral Profiling of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Larvae Following Teratogen Exposure
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Omics in Zebrafish Teratogenesis
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Proteomic Analysis of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) After Chemical Exposure
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Immunohistochemical Assessment as a Tool for Investigating Developmental Toxicity in Zebrafish (Danio rerio)
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Oxidative Stress Assessment in Zebrafish Larvae
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Hemodynamic Studies for Analyzing the Teratogenic Effects of Drugs in the Zebrafish Embryo
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Western Blot Analysis and Immunostaining for Prediction of Embryotoxicity in Mus musculus
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Histological and Histochemical Profile for Teratological Assessment in Mus musculus
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 In Vivo Analysis of Apoptosis in Embryonic Hippocampus
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 Measurement of Mitochondrial Toxicity Parameters in Embryonic Hippocampus
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32 Animal Tests for Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment in Neonatal Mouse
  34. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 33 Methodology of Genotoxic and Teratogenic Studies in Rats
  35. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 34 Whole Mount In Situ Hybridization and Morphometric Analysis in Rabbit Embryos
Attention for Chapter 15: Evaluation of Teratogenicity of Pharmaceuticals Using FETAX
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Evaluation of Teratogenicity of Pharmaceuticals Using FETAX
Chapter number 15
Book title
Teratogenicity Testing
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7883-0_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7882-3, 978-1-4939-7883-0
Authors

Hariz Islas-Flores, Itzayana Pérez-Alvaréz, Leobardo M. Gómez-Oliván, Islas-Flores, Hariz, Pérez-Alvaréz, Itzayana, Gómez-Oliván, Leobardo M.

Abstract

Pharmaceuticals are chemical compounds which are used to preserve human and animal health. Once administered, these compounds are metabolized or can remain unaltered until excreted. Therefore, a mixture of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites enters municipal sewers and wastewater treatment plants where, depending on their polarity, water solubility, and persistence, they cannot be completely removed or transformed during the treatment process, so that unaltered pharmaceuticals and/or their metabolites can enter surface water. As a result, in recent years concern has grown about trace concentrations and the risk they pose to ecosystems, considering the annual increase in pharmaceutical production and use at world level.This chapter reviews the frog embryo teratogenesis assay-Xenopus (FETAX). Originally developed during the mid-1980s as a test for detecting the developmental toxicity of pure chemical products and complex mixtures in the laboratory, in recent years it has been used to evaluate the mechanisms of action, biotransformation, and detoxification of xenobiotics as well as in ecotoxicology studies using alternative species and in situ monitoring.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,641,800
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,988
of 13,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,872
of 442,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.