↓ Skip to main content

ADP-ribosylation and NAD+ Utilizing Enzymes

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'ADP-ribosylation and NAD+ Utilizing Enzymes'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Vitamin B3 in Health and Disease: Toward the Second Century of Discovery
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Monitoring Poly(ADP-Ribosyl)ation in Response to DNA Damage in Live Cells Using Fluorescently Tagged Macrodomains
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 In Vitro Techniques for ADP-Ribosylated Substrate Identification
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Assessment of Intracellular Auto-Modification Levels of ARTD10 Using Mono-ADP-Ribose-Specific Macrodomains 2 and 3 of Murine Artd8
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Biochemical and Biophysical Assays of PAR-WWE Domain Interactions and Production of iso-ADPr for PAR-Binding Analysis
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Assays for NAD+-Dependent Reactions and NAD+ Metabolites
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Generating Protein-Linked and Protein-Free Mono-, Oligo-, and Poly(ADP-Ribose) In Vitro
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Methods to Study TCDD-Inducible Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase (TIPARP) Mono-ADP-Ribosyltransferase Activity
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Dictyostelium as a Model to Assess Site-Specific ADP-Ribosylation Events
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Mono-ADP-Ribosylation Catalyzed by Arginine-Specific ADP-Ribosyltransferases
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Monitoring Expression and Enzyme Activity of Ecto-ARTCs
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 ADP-Ribosyl-Acceptor Hydrolase Activities Catalyzed by the ARH Family of Proteins
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Mono-ADP-Ribosylhydrolase Assays
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Hydrolysis of ADP-Ribosylation by Macrodomains
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 HPLC-Based Enzyme Assays for Sirtuins
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Small-Molecule Screening Assay for Mono-ADP-Ribosyltransferases
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 A Simple, Sensitive, and Generalizable Plate Assay for Screening PARP Inhibitors
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Nonlocalized Searching of HCD Data for Fast and Sensitive Identification of ADP-Ribosylated Peptides
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Quantitative Determination of MAR Hydrolase Residue Specificity In Vitro by Tandem Mass Spectrometry
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Detection of ADP-Ribosylating Bacterial Toxins
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Preparation of Recombinant Alphaviruses for Functional Studies of ADP-Ribosylation
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Monitoring the Sensitivity of T Cell Populations Towards NAD+ Released During Cell Preparation
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Identifying Target RNAs of PARPs
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 ADPr-Peptide Synthesis
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Identifying Genomic Sites of ADP-Ribosylation Mediated by Specific Nuclear PARP Enzymes Using Click-ChIP
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Methods for Using a Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Biosensor to Monitor Nuclear NAD +
Attention for Chapter 25: Identifying Genomic Sites of ADP-Ribosylation Mediated by Specific Nuclear PARP Enzymes Using Click-ChIP
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Identifying Genomic Sites of ADP-Ribosylation Mediated by Specific Nuclear PARP Enzymes Using Click-ChIP
Chapter number 25
Book title
ADP-ribosylation and NAD+ Utilizing Enzymes
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8588-3_25
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8587-6, 978-1-4939-8588-3
Authors

Ryan A. Rogge, Bryan A. Gibson, W. Lee Kraus, Rogge, Ryan A., Gibson, Bryan A., Kraus, W. Lee

Abstract

Nuclear poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs), including PARPs 1, 2, and 3 and the Tankyrases, belong to a family of enzymes that can bind to chromatin and covalently modify histone- and chromatin-associated proteins with ADP-ribose derived from nuclear NAD+. The genomic loci where the nuclear PARPs bind and covalently modify chromatin are a fundamental question in PARP biology. Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with deep sequencing (ChIP-seq) has become an essential tool for determining specific sites of binding and modification genome-wide. Few methods are available, however, for localizing PARP-specific ADP-ribosylation events across the genome. Here we describe a variation of ChIP-seq, called Click-ChIP-seq, for identifying sites of ADP-ribosylation mediated by specific PARP family members. This method uses analog-sensitive PARP (asPARP) technology, including asPARP mutants and the alkyne-containing "clickable" NAD+ analog 8-Bu(3-yne)T-NAD+. In this assay, nuclei from cells expressing an asPARP protein of interest are incubated with 8-Bu(3-yne)T-NAD+, which is incorporated into ADP-ribose modifications mediated only by that specific asPARP protein. The nuclei are then subjected to cross-linking with formaldehyde, and the protein-linked analog ADP-ribose is clicked to biotin using copper-catalyzed alkyne-azide "click" chemistry. The chromatin is fragmented, and the fragments containing analog ADP-ribose are enriched using streptavidin-mediated precipitation. Finally, the enriched DNA is analyzed by qPCR or deep-sequencing experiments to determine which genomic loci contain ADP-ribose modifications mediated by the specific PARP protein of interest. Click-ChIP-seq has proven to be a robust and reproducible method for identifying chromatin-associated, PARP-specific ADP-ribosylation events genome-wide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 50%
Chemistry 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,138,420
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,984
of 13,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,897
of 331,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#66
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.