↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
52 news outlets
blogs
25 blogs
twitter
1332 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
34 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
13 Google+ users
reddit
4 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2016
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0146193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ming-Jin Liu, Cai-Hua Xiong, Le Xiong, Xiao-Lin Huang

Abstract

Hand coordination can allow humans to have dexterous control with many degrees of freedom to perform various tasks in daily living. An important contributing factor to this important ability is the complex biomechanical architecture of the human hand. However, drawing a clear functional link between biomechanical architecture and hand coordination is challenging. It is not understood which biomechanical characteristics are responsible for hand coordination and what specific effect each biomechanical characteristic has. To explore this link, we first inspected the characteristics of hand coordination during daily tasks through a statistical analysis of the kinematic data, which were collected from thirty right-handed subjects during a multitude of grasping tasks. Then, the functional link between biomechanical architecture and hand coordination was drawn by establishing the clear corresponding causality between the tendinous connective characteristics of the human hand and the coordinated characteristics during daily grasping activities. The explicit functional link indicates that the biomechanical characteristic of tendinous connective architecture between muscles and articulations is the proper design by the Creator to perform a multitude of daily tasks in a comfortable way. The clear link between the structure and the function of the human hand also suggests that the design of a multifunctional robotic hand should be able to better imitate such basic architecture.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,332 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 2%
Germany 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 241 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 20%
Researcher 44 17%
Student > Master 37 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Professor 18 7%
Other 53 20%
Unknown 39 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 25%
Engineering 27 10%
Environmental Science 21 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 8%
Psychology 12 5%
Other 66 25%
Unknown 51 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1457. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,795
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#95
of 211,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84
of 403,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3
of 4,924 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,924 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.