↓ Skip to main content

Prokaryotic Systems Biology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Prokaryotic Systems Biology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Metagenomics as a Tool for Enzyme Discovery: Hydrolytic Enzymes from Marine-Related Metagenomes
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Investigating Bacterial Protein Synthesis Using Systems Biology Approaches.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Biology and Assembly of the Bacterial Envelope
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Comparative Genomics and Evolutionary Modularity of Prokaryotes
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Predicting Functional Interactions Among Genes in Prokaryotes by Genomic Context
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Functional Implications of Domain Organization Within Prokaryotic Rhomboid Proteases
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Mapping Transcription Regulatory Networks with ChIP-seq and RNA-seq.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Quantitative and Systems-Based Approaches for Deciphering Bacterial Membrane Interactome and Gene Function
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Prokaryotic Systems Biology
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Genetic Interaction Scoring Procedure for Bacterial Species
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Mapping the Protein-Protein Interactome Networks Using Yeast Two-Hybrid Screens.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Biogenesis of Escherichia coli DMSO Reductase: A Network of Participants for Protein Folding and Complex Enzyme Maturation.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Microbial Proteome Profiling and Systems Biology: Applications to Mycobacterium tuberculosis
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Structural Aspects of Bacterial Outer Membrane Protein Assembly.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Substrate Interaction Networks of the Escherichia coli Chaperones: Trigger Factor, DnaK and GroEL
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Genetic, Biochemical, and Structural Analyses of Bacterial Surface Polysaccharides
Attention for Chapter 15: Substrate Interaction Networks of the Escherichia coli Chaperones: Trigger Factor, DnaK and GroEL
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Substrate Interaction Networks of the Escherichia coli Chaperones: Trigger Factor, DnaK and GroEL
Chapter number 15
Book title
Prokaryotic Systems Biology
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-23603-2_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-923602-5, 978-3-31-923603-2
Authors

Vaibhav Bhandari, Walid A. Houry, Bhandari, Vaibhav, Houry, Walid A.

Abstract

In the dense cellular environment, protein misfolding and inter-molecular protein aggregation compete with protein folding. Chaperones associate with proteins to prevent misfolding and to assist in folding to the native state. In Escherichia coli, the chaperones trigger factor, DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE, and GroEL/ES are the major chaperones responsible for insuring proper de novo protein folding. With multitudes of proteins produced by the bacterium, the chaperones have to be selective for their substrates. Yet, chaperone selectivity cannot be too specific. Recent biochemical and high-throughput studies have provided important insights highlighting the strategies used by chaperones in maintaining proteostasis in the cell. Here, we discuss the substrate networks and cooperation among these protein folding chaperones.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,554,098
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,237
of 4,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,472
of 354,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#60
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.