RT @LUGELab: Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/tIm31wo33O
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/VUOZwUup0w
When a finding is statistically significant, we have to ask "so what? what is the implication?". Just because it is significant doesn't mean it's important, and just because it is not significant doesn't mean it isn't important. https://t.co/nxzy7dsyj3
RT @mfherrador: Los científicos se rebelan contra la significancia estadística https://t.co/lvVzDB6DA1
Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/okSLYlFuOt
Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/8CC2ok36I5
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/VUOZwUup0w
RT @NatureDigest: 800人以上の科学者が「統計学的に有意」という概念そのものを放棄しようと提案。例えばp値という閾値の下なら効果や差が「あり」で上なら「なし」、などということはなく、そのように簡単に結論してはならないのだが、閾値で分けるやり方が蔓延し、多くの人…
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/MgDBhjyyaQ
RT @IzabelaZych: Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/IFmbviJ7pu
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/VUOZwUup0w
RT @AndyBiotech: The whole world is up against "statistical significance" this week... ASA Special issue on "A World Beyond p < 0.05" htt…
RT @gchikermane: And now, a “surgical strike against thoughtless testing of statistical significance” and “an opportunity to register your…
RT @NatureDigest: 800人以上の科学者が「統計学的に有意」という概念そのものを放棄しようと提案。例えばp値という閾値の下なら効果や差が「あり」で上なら「なし」、などということはなく、そのように簡単に結論してはならないのだが、閾値で分けるやり方が蔓延し、多くの人…
RT @Dr_A_Rashid: “Unfortunately, the false belief that crossing the threshold of statistical significance is enough to show that a result i…
RT @NatureDigest: 800人以上の科学者が「統計学的に有意」という概念そのものを放棄しようと提案。例えばp値という閾値の下なら効果や差が「あり」で上なら「なし」、などということはなく、そのように簡単に結論してはならないのだが、閾値で分けるやり方が蔓延し、多くの人…
"The trouble is human and cognitive more than it is statistical: bucketing results into ‘statistically significant’ and ‘statistically non-significant’ makes people think that the items assigned in that way are categorically different" https://t.co/15uVM
Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/QNtCXgQmCs
Interesting.
RT @sara131274: Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/BcQhpbpUV2
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/VUOZwUup0w
Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/BcQhpbpUV2
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/VUOZwUup0w
RT @StephenBHeard: You might expect this to be more nonsense like BASP's ban on p-values. It isn't - it's a sensible and well-argued objec…
Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/qBz8O7RGZm
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/VUOZwUup0w
RT @StephenBHeard: You might expect this to be more nonsense like BASP's ban on p-values. It isn't - it's a sensible and well-argued objec…
RT @bitacorabeagle: Más de 800 firmas de científicos exigen que se abandone el concepto de significación estadística. https://t.co/yEbpJ0iV…
RT @ABAatUTSA: Bold article proposes major reforms in statistical analysis https://t.co/Hp1FsIgEBJ
Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/HVwAW6bx2r
RT @FarhadPishgar: Statistically non-significant associations should no longer be interpreted as “proving the null hypothesis”. Nor should…
Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/hzSNeYUhlM
About time...
Los resultados son estadísticamente significativos (?) Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/YDdUtVTDX1
RT @NatureNews: “We are not calling for a ban on P values,” say three statisticians and more than 800 signatories. Just "for the entire con…
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/VUOZwUup0w
RT @NatureDigest: 800人以上の科学者が「統計学的に有意」という概念そのものを放棄しようと提案。例えばp値という閾値の下なら効果や差が「あり」で上なら「なし」、などということはなく、そのように簡単に結論してはならないのだが、閾値で分けるやり方が蔓延し、多くの人…
Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/PSKJE8ta7W
RT @daniel_puleston: In a paper I published during my PhD, I left out an exciting piece of data important for mechanistic insight, all beca…
RT @mfherrador: Los científicos se rebelan contra la significancia estadística https://t.co/lvVzDB6DA1
RT @rlmcelreath: I was away from twitter most of the week, so missed the newest attempt to protect science from statistical significance. h…
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/VUOZwUup0w
As an environmental chemist, I rarely use the null hypothesis in my research but I find this article quite interesting and a goodread. https://t.co/2mCJXXRsIH
RT @rlmcelreath: I was away from twitter most of the week, so missed the newest attempt to protect science from statistical significance. h…
The growing chorus around the use of statistical significance (p-value) is heartening but whether it would stand the test of "Reviewer #3" warrants more experiments (minor revisions needed) https://t.co/gEoEWTJNTf
RT @NatureDigest: 800人以上の科学者が「統計学的に有意」という概念そのものを放棄しようと提案。例えばp値という閾値の下なら効果や差が「あり」で上なら「なし」、などということはなく、そのように簡単に結論してはならないのだが、閾値で分けるやり方が蔓延し、多くの人…
RT @rlmcelreath: I was away from twitter most of the week, so missed the newest attempt to protect science from statistical significance. h…
RT @KMcManus84: Nature commentary calls “for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned” https://t.co/XmOzR4YGYc
RT @rlmcelreath: I was away from twitter most of the week, so missed the newest attempt to protect science from statistical significance. h…
RT @drcaplan: ...thinking outside the medical/scientific box... https://t.co/c2oJMK3ceN https://t.co/wt8mbBdfOv
RT @NatureDigest: 800人以上の科学者が「統計学的に有意」という概念そのものを放棄しようと提案。例えばp値という閾値の下なら効果や差が「あり」で上なら「なし」、などということはなく、そのように簡単に結論してはならないのだが、閾値で分けるやり方が蔓延し、多くの人…
RT @gchikermane: And now, a “surgical strike against thoughtless testing of statistical significance” and “an opportunity to register your…
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/VUOZwUup0w
RT @LuotoRiitta: ” Tilastollinen merkitsevyys ” on väärinkäsitys ja joutaa eläkkeelle, toivotetaan luottamusvälit tervetulleeksi. P-arvorii…
RT @NatureDigest: 800人以上の科学者が「統計学的に有意」という概念そのものを放棄しようと提案。例えばp値という閾値の下なら効果や差が「あり」で上なら「なし」、などということはなく、そのように簡単に結論してはならないのだが、閾値で分けるやり方が蔓延し、多くの人…
RT @BroadhurstDavid: EVERYBODY in science should read this. I’ve been banging on for decades about uncertainty (over significance) and test…
RT @petergklein: We often hear calls to make the social sciences more empirical and data driven (i.e., more "scientific"). These calls igno…
RT @NatureDigest: 800人以上の科学者が「統計学的に有意」という概念そのものを放棄しようと提案。例えばp値という閾値の下なら効果や差が「あり」で上なら「なし」、などということはなく、そのように簡単に結論してはならないのだが、閾値で分けるやり方が蔓延し、多くの人…
RT @BJSM_BMJ: Food for thought. Have you seen BJSM's 'Methods Matter' series? https://t.co/DzIJnjTSAF Thanks Assoc Prof Rasmus Nielsen @RU…
RT @vibass7: After reading the statement in Nature against statistical significance, don't you think that we are forgetting about the paper…
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/X2xG02xi1j
RT @rlmcelreath: I was away from twitter most of the week, so missed the newest attempt to protect science from statistical significance. h…
RT @SciPhiPod: Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/ey3Wa5Eim9
Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/8c0WZTcJJ3
RT @MarcelCardillo: This is one of those articles that all scientists should read, and we should be encouraging our students to read. Scien…
Food for thought. Have you seen BJSM's 'Methods Matter' series? https://t.co/DzIJnjTSAF Thanks Assoc Prof Rasmus Nielsen @RUNSAFE_Rasmus, Dr Mohammad Ali Mansournia and Professor @EvertVerhagen for leadership. (Not free but I'm gonna snip into next tweet)
RT @koro485: Natureから「統計的有意性」に固執するのをやめようというコメントがオンライン公開されました。世界52カ国、854名からの賛同のサインも公開。 p値自体の価値を否定するものではなく、p < 0.05 or notという2カテゴリーに分類してしまうこ…
RT @koro485: Natureから「統計的有意性」に固執するのをやめようというコメントがオンライン公開されました。世界52カ国、854名からの賛同のサインも公開。 p値自体の価値を否定するものではなく、p < 0.05 or notという2カテゴリーに分類してしまうこ…
I was torn on whether to cosign the call in @nature to retire p-values (https://t.co/Dm9MwHPIK4) and decided against it. My worry is what (if anything) we replace p-values with, and whether the cure may be worse than the disease. Ionnidis agrees but with m
@usaf48 https://t.co/kObdcCv3jW Scientists rise up against statistical significance
Científicos se levantan contra la significancia estadística. ¿Se puede prescindir de ese concepto? Via @nature https://t.co/PBk3iYaCWJ
RT @rlmcelreath: I was away from twitter most of the week, so missed the newest attempt to protect science from statistical significance. h…
RT @NatureDigest: 800人以上の科学者が「統計学的に有意」という概念そのものを放棄しようと提案。例えばp値という閾値の下なら効果や差が「あり」で上なら「なし」、などということはなく、そのように簡単に結論してはならないのだが、閾値で分けるやり方が蔓延し、多くの人…
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/VUOZwUup0w
RT @nihilistspicer: Output: p<0.05 Me: this is good. oh wait, forgot to use robust standard errors. *reruns code* Output: p>0.05 Me: htt…
RT @nihilistspicer: Output: p<0.05 Me: this is good. oh wait, forgot to use robust standard errors. *reruns code* Output: p>0.05 Me: htt…
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/VUOZwUup0w
RT @globalpmh: Interesting article about the undue importance given to the p value! Scientists rise up against statistical significance htt…
RT @NatureDigest: 800人以上の科学者が「統計学的に有意」という概念そのものを放棄しようと提案。例えばp値という閾値の下なら効果や差が「あり」で上なら「なし」、などということはなく、そのように簡単に結論してはならないのだが、閾値で分けるやり方が蔓延し、多くの人…
RT @AndyBiotech: The whole world is up against "statistical significance" this week... ASA Special issue on "A World Beyond p < 0.05" htt…
RT @smehralivand: So glad to see increasing resistance against false interpretations of #Statistics and #pvalues. It is time to stop the #…
RT @NatureDigest: 800人以上の科学者が「統計学的に有意」という概念そのものを放棄しようと提案。例えばp値という閾値の下なら効果や差が「あり」で上なら「なし」、などということはなく、そのように簡単に結論してはならないのだが、閾値で分けるやり方が蔓延し、多くの人…
I was away from twitter most of the week, so missed the newest attempt to protect science from statistical significance. https://t.co/xNYxJwPlvH These articles are like Batman movies: We are doomed to make a new one every 2 years. https://t.co/rZbZU7y5ch
RT @marios_tasoulis: Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/1TCbPIwWMH
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/VUOZwUup0w
RT @NatureDigest: 800人以上の科学者が「統計学的に有意」という概念そのものを放棄しようと提案。例えばp値という閾値の下なら効果や差が「あり」で上なら「なし」、などということはなく、そのように簡単に結論してはならないのだが、閾値で分けるやり方が蔓延し、多くの人…
RT @BroadhurstDavid: EVERYBODY in science should read this. I’ve been banging on for decades about uncertainty (over significance) and test…
"We’re sick of seeing such nonsensical ‘proofs of the null’ and claims of non-association in presentations & research articles. Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/BnrVdYiap6
RT @bitacorabeagle: Más de 800 firmas de científicos exigen que se abandone el concepto de significación estadística. https://t.co/yEbpJ0iV…
RT @NatureDigest: 800人以上の科学者が「統計学的に有意」という概念そのものを放棄しようと提案。例えばp値という閾値の下なら効果や差が「あり」で上なら「なし」、などということはなく、そのように簡単に結論してはならないのだが、閾値で分けるやり方が蔓延し、多くの人…
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/VUOZwUup0w
Ça va mieux avec l' article ( excellent) https://t.co/dgrdEBSLim
RT @pwilmarth: Really? The answer to misusing statistical testing is to abandon statistical testing? How about education and good examples?…
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/X2xG02xi1j
RT @NatureDigest: 800人以上の科学者が「統計学的に有意」という概念そのものを放棄しようと提案。例えばp値という閾値の下なら効果や差が「あり」で上なら「なし」、などということはなく、そのように簡単に結論してはならないのだが、閾値で分けるやり方が蔓延し、多くの人…
RT @NatureNews: More than 800 signatories call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned. https://t.co/VUOZwUup0w
RT @pawinpawin: เวลาสอน สอนนักเรียนเสมอว่าเวลาเจอ p value ไม่ใช่ให้กระโจนตอบว่า sig หรือ ไม่ sig ให้คำนึงถึงว่า p value เป็น continuum of p…