RT @AkshaySharmaMD: Challenging the 10K steps/day dogma 👇🏽: Walking 🚶 more than 7500 steps/day is associated with diminishing ⬇️ returns in…
RT @doctormiralles: Seguimos creyendo los médicos que los pacientes han de caminar al menos 10.000 pasos al día. Una muestra más de lo mal…
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/kC3Tfl9mtc
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Este estudio de cohorte de 16 741 mujeres mayores del Estudio de salud de la mujer examina las asociaciones de la cantidad de pasos por día y la intensidad de los pasos con mortalidad por todas las causas. https://t.co/MaEBpsHS21
RT @ADPconsultancy: OK older ladies - live 4.2 years longer with 4700 steps daily - and longer with 7500 steps. Association of Step Volume…
RT @ADPconsultancy: OK older ladies - live 4.2 years longer with 4700 steps daily - and longer with 7500 steps. Association of Step Volume…
RT @artwalaszek: 1/2 Secrets of successful #aging: walk more. In this study of older women (mean age 72), those who walked more (avg 4400 s…
RT @StefanSiebert1: Like much health advice, 10000 steps/d was not based on evidence and often had reverse effect as not achievable for man…
RT @DrScottLear: The beneficial effects of #walking 🚶♀️in older women start from the very first steps and continue until around 7500 steps…
In 'makes a good press release' news - from the Journal of the American Medical Association (does not equal causation)
1/2 Secrets of successful #aging: walk more. In this study of older women (mean age 72), those who walked more (avg 4400 steps/day) had lower 4-yr mortality than those who walked less (2700/d). Benefit leveled off after 7500/d. https://t.co/ZDHh3WPBBi
RT @EricTopol: Or one of the first (if not the 1st) study to look at number of steps vs. a hard outcome @JAMAInternalMed https://t.co/ECEC…
RT @EricTopol: Or one of the first (if not the 1st) study to look at number of steps vs. a hard outcome @JAMAInternalMed https://t.co/ECEC…
Are increased numbers of steps per day associated with lower mortality rates among older women? https://t.co/WpxAsc78sh @jama
RT @doctormiralles: Seguimos creyendo los médicos que los pacientes han de caminar al menos 10.000 pasos al día. Una muestra más de lo mal…
#BestFriendsDay #walk with your friends #steps to health
RT @kajikaji_pt: 対象者は平均年齢72歳、女性16700人👩🦳 2200歩以内は死亡率高く、 7500歩が最も死亡率低いが、 それ以上は7500歩とほとんど変わらない、という報告。 歩けるけど歩いていない人と、歩きすぎている人に伝えたい🤔 https:/…
RT @EricTopol: Or one of the first (if not the 1st) study to look at number of steps vs. a hard outcome @JAMAInternalMed https://t.co/ECEC…
RT @kajikaji_pt: 対象者は平均年齢72歳、女性16700人👩🦳 2200歩以内は死亡率高く、 7500歩が最も死亡率低いが、 それ以上は7500歩とほとんど変わらない、という報告。 歩けるけど歩いていない人と、歩きすぎている人に伝えたい🤔 https:/…
RT @kajikaji_pt: 対象者は平均年齢72歳、女性16700人👩🦳 2200歩以内は死亡率高く、 7500歩が最も死亡率低いが、 それ以上は7500歩とほとんど変わらない、という報告。 歩けるけど歩いていない人と、歩きすぎている人に伝えたい🤔 https:/…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @kajikaji_pt: 対象者は平均年齢72歳、女性16700人👩🦳 2200歩以内は死亡率高く、 7500歩が最も死亡率低いが、 それ以上は7500歩とほとんど変わらない、という報告。 歩けるけど歩いていない人と、歩きすぎている人に伝えたい🤔 https:/…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @kajikaji_pt: 対象者は平均年齢72歳、女性16700人👩🦳 2200歩以内は死亡率高く、 7500歩が最も死亡率低いが、 それ以上は7500歩とほとんど変わらない、という報告。 歩けるけど歩いていない人と、歩きすぎている人に伝えたい🤔 https:/…
RT @kajikaji_pt: 対象者は平均年齢72歳、女性16700人👩🦳 2200歩以内は死亡率高く、 7500歩が最も死亡率低いが、 それ以上は7500歩とほとんど変わらない、という報告。 歩けるけど歩いていない人と、歩きすぎている人に伝えたい🤔 https:/…
RT @doctormiralles: Seguimos creyendo los médicos que los pacientes han de caminar al menos 10.000 pasos al día. Una muestra más de lo mal…
対象者は平均年齢72歳、女性16700人👩🦳 2200歩以内は死亡率高く、 7500歩が最も死亡率低いが、 それ以上は7500歩とほとんど変わらない、という報告。 歩けるけど歩いていない人と、歩きすぎている人に伝えたい🤔 https://t.co/yOQ77nJbKn
RT @gkierzek: 7500 pas par jour « suffisent » ou 30’ d’activité physique/marche par jour. Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All…
Asociación de volumen e intensidad de pasos con causas de mortalidad total en mujeres de edad avanzada. https://t.co/dsQqFoASxy
OK older ladies - live 4.2 years longer with 4700 steps daily - and longer with 7500 steps. Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/LCpSad7929
@tsolsen @HelleJensen Ift skridt (2): her er en kilde, som siger 7.500. Men det handler om ældre damer og måske skyldes det andre ting end aktivitetsniveau (årsag/virkning kan være omvendt jo) https://t.co/bR8KlhuagM
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women | Geriatrics | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network https://t.co/e7lj9V5qzp
How many steps per day are needed to reduce your risk of mortality? This study says at least 4400 but not more than 7500 for older women. https://t.co/dLmMSUJn9K
RT @alvaro_casasher: Una vez más se vuelve a replicar lo que decía Jerry Morries en 1953 en #lancet,quien se mueve mas vive más. A que esp…
RT @doctormiralles: Seguimos creyendo los médicos que los pacientes han de caminar al menos 10.000 pasos al día. Una muestra más de lo mal…
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/gTIH5D7osK
More steps associated with lower mortality, but effect plateaus at 7500/day. The 10k rule was always false #fitness. JAMA Network https://t.co/2Mf5fmM7nq
RT @alvaro_casasher: Una vez más se vuelve a replicar lo que decía Jerry Morries en 1953 en #lancet,quien se mueve mas vive más. A que esp…
RT @doctormiralles: Seguimos creyendo los médicos que los pacientes han de caminar al menos 10.000 pasos al día. Una muestra más de lo mal…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Interesting analysis of number of steps per day and impact on health. For older women, 4,400 steps had a significant health benefit, leveling off @ 7,500.
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
If you are sedentary, just a little bit of exercise shows a big benefit.
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @doctormiralles: Seguimos creyendo los médicos que los pacientes han de caminar al menos 10.000 pasos al día. Una muestra más de lo mal…
RT @doctormiralles: Seguimos creyendo los médicos que los pacientes han de caminar al menos 10.000 pasos al día. Una muestra más de lo mal…
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/zmndAknRdT
RT @AkshaySharmaMD: Challenging the 10K steps/day dogma 👇🏽: Walking 🚶 more than 7500 steps/day is associated with diminishing ⬇️ returns in…
RT @gkierzek: 7500 pas par jour « suffisent » ou 30’ d’activité physique/marche par jour. Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All…
RT @doctormiralles: Seguimos creyendo los médicos que los pacientes han de caminar al menos 10.000 pasos al día. Una muestra más de lo mal…
RT @gkierzek: 7500 pas par jour « suffisent » ou 30’ d’activité physique/marche par jour. Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All…
RT @gkierzek: 7500 pas par jour « suffisent » ou 30’ d’activité physique/marche par jour. Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All…
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/TnZGrctXkN #movemorelivemore
RT @AkshaySharmaMD: Challenging the 10K steps/day dogma 👇🏽: Walking 🚶 more than 7500 steps/day is associated with diminishing ⬇️ returns in…
Seguimos creyendo los médicos que los pacientes han de caminar al menos 10.000 pasos al día. Una muestra más de lo mal que prescribimos el ejercicio. Jama acaba de publicar que mujeres de 70 años mejoran su mortalidad progresivamen…https://t.co/e3ctwEYChA
RT @gkierzek: 7500 pas par jour « suffisent » ou 30’ d’activité physique/marche par jour. Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All…
7500 pas par jour « suffisent » ou 30’ d’activité physique/marche par jour. Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women | Geriatrics | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network https://t.co/fF1dkqhJIC
RT @DrScottLear: The beneficial effects of #walking 🚶♀️in older women start from the very first steps and continue until around 7500 steps…
Perhaps 7500 steps/day is the evidence based recommendation in older women now... Additional benefits likely come with strength training and HIIT as well (even in elderly!) Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women h
#antiaging Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/kb788JVpN1
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women | Geriatrics | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network - just more evidence that #exercise and reaching 7500 steps per day is beneficial for #health - reducing #mortality https
RT @AkshaySharmaMD: Challenging the 10K steps/day dogma 👇🏽: Walking 🚶 more than 7500 steps/day is associated with diminishing ⬇️ returns in…
Step by step to older #age with #wearable:Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause #Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/1K1KjfmW9i
Caminar en las #personasmayores, más que necesario. Es funcionalidad, es #ejercicio, es #salud Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in #OlderWomen https://t.co/Vi7xwdX9SR @Socgeriatria @SENAMAGOB
RT @AkshaySharmaMD: Challenging the 10K steps/day dogma 👇🏽: Walking 🚶 more than 7500 steps/day is associated with diminishing ⬇️ returns in…
RT @AkshaySharmaMD: Challenging the 10K steps/day dogma 👇🏽: Walking 🚶 more than 7500 steps/day is associated with diminishing ⬇️ returns in…
RT @AkshaySharmaMD: Challenging the 10K steps/day dogma 👇🏽: Walking 🚶 more than 7500 steps/day is associated with diminishing ⬇️ returns in…
RT @GMahe_: 7500 pas/jour: et vous combien en faites vous? https://t.co/F9HXRJ0tdA
7500 pas/jour: et vous combien en faites vous?
RT @DrScottLear: The beneficial effects of #walking 🚶♀️in older women start from the very first steps and continue until around 7500 steps…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @heartbeat: Older #women getting ~7500 steps/day have lower rates of death. #CountIt @JAMAInternalMed @fitbit @Apple https://t.co/tyju…
Older #women getting ~7500 steps/day have lower rates of death. #CountIt @JAMAInternalMed @fitbit @Apple https://t.co/tyjuL0veGr
RT @DrScottLear: The beneficial effects of #walking 🚶♀️in older women start from the very first steps and continue until around 7500 steps…
RT @DrScottLear: The beneficial effects of #walking 🚶♀️in older women start from the very first steps and continue until around 7500 steps…
RT @OncoFITness: A goal of 10 000 steps/d is commonly believed by the public to be necessary for health, but this number has limited scient…
A goal of 10 000 steps/d is commonly believed by the public to be necessary for health, but this number has limited scientific basis. This study shows that more steps taken p.d. are associated with lower mortality rates until approximately 7500 steps/d. ht
RT @DrScottLear: The beneficial effects of #walking 🚶♀️in older women start from the very first steps and continue until around 7500 steps…
RT @DrScottLear: The beneficial effects of #walking 🚶♀️in older women start from the very first steps and continue until around 7500 steps…
RT @DrScottLear: The beneficial effects of #walking 🚶♀️in older women start from the very first steps and continue until around 7500 steps…
RT @DrScottLear: The beneficial effects of #walking 🚶♀️in older women start from the very first steps and continue until around 7500 steps…
RT @DrScottLear: The beneficial effects of #walking 🚶♀️in older women start from the very first steps and continue until around 7500 steps…
RT @StefanSiebert1: Like much health advice, 10000 steps/d was not based on evidence and often had reverse effect as not achievable for man…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
#MOVE like your life depended on it (it does). Start where you are. Use what you have. The more the better. 🔗https://t.co/vxZZdBnkE9 https://t.co/3VLtR0UT8t
“Among older women, as few as approximately 4400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2700 steps/d.” https://t.co/RINK6u1EH9
RT @docramiro: En pacientes #geriátricos (media 72 años) , #caminar 2700 pasos por día y hasta 7500 disminuye la #mortalidad progresivament…
En pacientes #geriátricos (media 72 años) , #caminar 2700 pasos por día y hasta 7500 disminuye la #mortalidad progresivamente. ¿Cuántos pasos promedias por día? Link: https://t.co/MjSdbSnP3j https://t.co/Jb6olG6cuQ
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Forget 10,000 steps we should set the #watches to celebrate 4400 steps per day because that is all that is needed for an improvement on mortality at 4 years of follow...or is it? As always, devil in the details and follow this thread for more https://t.co
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…