RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @carloscelism: How many steps are enough? All-cause mortality in >16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with lower risk at 4,400 steps/…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Older women taking 4,400 steps/day have lower mortality than those taking 2,700; "more is better" up to 7,500 steps/da…
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Older women taking 4,400 steps/day have lower mortality than those taking 2,700; "more is better" up to 7,500 steps/da…
New goal!
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Good news for people who can't hit 10,000 steps per day. Less is more, so get walking and get your heart in shape! SPONSOR: CardioComm $EKG Connecting your heart (ECG) to the cloud. *FDA approval received *Sales in 20+ countries to large customers *Mobil
RT @JAMAInternalMed: Older women taking 4,400 steps/day have lower mortality than those taking 2,700; "more is better" up to 7,500 steps/da…
RT @GlopesMd: For #ASCO19... no need to hack up those many steps... @GlopesMd https://t.co/Mg8o0LBB9u
Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women https://t.co/uS8pFqVqIr
8,000 is the new 10,000
@_DavidSmith
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Las mujeres mayores que sumaron 4.400 pasos/día tienen una mortalidad más baja que las que sumaron 2.700 "Más es mejor" hasta 7.500 pasos por día suman vida! #cdp2019 Step With All-Cause Mortality | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network https://t.co/ChPIY
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @centinel5051: Relación entre el número de pasos diarios y riesgo de mortalidad https://t.co/6dPYFb6Unh Más pasos asociado a menor riesg…
RT @carloscelism: How many steps are enough? All-cause mortality in >16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with lower risk at 4,400 steps/…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
每天走7500步就足以续命了,再多益处不是很大。 (平均年龄72岁的老年女性,干预指标包括步数、行走强度、行走速度,最后发现能够显著降低全因死亡率的主要指标还是步数。日步数提升到7500步之前,全因死亡率是逐渐下降的;超过7500步后全因死亡率不再降低。)
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Relación entre el número de pasos diarios y riesgo de mortalidad https://t.co/6dPYFb6Unh Más pasos asociado a menor riesgo (hasta unos 7500 diarios). Estudio con mujeres de edad avanzada https://t.co/UXQh81bpyY
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @carloscelism: How many steps are enough? All-cause mortality in >16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with lower risk at 4,400 steps/…
How many steps are enough? All-cause mortality in >16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with lower risk at 4,400 steps/day and levelling at 7,500 steps/day https://t.co/Oomx4wC7Am
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Older women taking 4,400 steps/day have lower mortality than those taking 2,700; "more is better" up to 7,500 steps/day, when mortality rates level https://t.co/TTC8BPLlXZ #ACSM19
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
Good to see some evidence @hsesteps
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
10,00 steps; 10,000 hours; - both Hogwash. But we knew that.
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
“Among older women, as few as approximately 4,400 steps/d was significantly related to lower mortality rates compared with approximately 2,700 steps/d. With more steps per day, mortality rates progressively decreased before leveling at approximately 7,500
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
I feel like my 9,484 so far today have been a waste! 😉
For #ASCO19... no need to hack up those many steps... @GlopesMd
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
RT @EricTopol: So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with…
So much for 10,000 steps/d (which was never validated). All-cause mortality in > 16,000 women, mean age 72, associated with significant benefit at 4,400 and leveling at 7,500 steps/d @JAMAInternalMed https://t.co/ECECGrz6pn https://t.co/9UjPBnxDka