RT @SteB777: @AndyGoldney @JohnRussell40 Self-evidently you are a denier, and denier of reality of evidence and science. Unprecedented, me…
@cohler https://t.co/kRbTxqq9df And https://t.co/z0Dl97eRcL to get you started.
@AndyGoldney @JohnRussell40 Self-evidently you are a denier, and denier of reality of evidence and science. Unprecedented, means what it says. It means not recorded before, in the recent and relevant history. Claims that it was warmer before in the Roman
@Mujhunter @JohnRussell40 Complete and utter bs https://t.co/WBKKZpk7tB https://t.co/ZFbyZieaot
@bannister_28644 @ECOWARRIORSS The paper is pretty evident. https://t.co/YLrQBolWI4
@hairymarx1 @agentsinaction @ProphetSholto @ejwwest @JohnMashey @25_cycle @dimeinurear @Ceist8 @HmGinYYC @thomasdenmark @theAGU We've advanced our knowledge since the 1990's (30 years ago). We now know that the MWP was not global. There is "No evidence for
RT @TWTThisIsNow: @dimeinurear @badmoonrising11 @25_cycle @ProphetSholto @Ceist8 @HmGinYYC @alangnixon @thomasdenmark Q: Why do "skeptics"…
@ProphetSholto @ejwwest @25_cycle @hairymarx1 @alangnixon @dimeinurear @Ceist8 @HmGinYYC @thomasdenmark Denying science and reality is what religions and you do. So, another projection, cultist. And we ARE in an ice age, kid. Learn the basics first. Go to
@ProphetSholto @HmGinYYC @25_cycle @hairymarx1 @alangnixon @dimeinurear @Ceist8 @thomasdenmark I didn't. I already told you you shouldn't lie. We ARE in an ice age, science denier. And the MWP wasn't like today. Stop lying. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF Start
@AssoClimatoReal @Kenneth72712993 Le problème c'est la non-simultanéité de vos exemples. Pour avoir un effet global, il faut que ce soit global et simultané… Neukom et al 2019. No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustri
RT @TWTThisIsNow: @dimeinurear @badmoonrising11 @25_cycle @ProphetSholto @Ceist8 @HmGinYYC @alangnixon @thomasdenmark Q: Why do "skeptics"…
@dimeinurear @badmoonrising11 @25_cycle @ProphetSholto @Ceist8 @HmGinYYC @alangnixon @thomasdenmark Q: Why do "skeptics" still obsess over a graph by Michael Mann from the last century, the general results of which have been replicated dozens of times via
@dimeinurear @badmoonrising11 @25_cycle @ProphetSholto @HmGinYYC @alangnixon @thomasdenmark The MWP and LIA were regional not global "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era"- PAGES2K 2019 https://t.co
@bannister_28644 @25_cycle @JordanBakerBK @_ClimateCraze The MWP happened but it was regional warming, not global warming
@bannister_28644 @25_cycle @JordanBakerBK @_ClimateCraze You didn't read the paper that refuted Loehle's flawed 2007 paper. Not only was it flawed, it wasn't GLOBAL mean temperature. The MWP was regional, NOT global & was not warmer than today. http
@bannister_28644 @25_cycle @JordanBakerBK @_ClimateCraze You posted a dishonest blog article from a fossil fuel lobby group Clintel. The MWP was regional, NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold
@karppari @HarriLuuppala @peikko763 @MVirtanen @SimoRuoho Maallikko voi nimenomaan kuvitella, että pieni jääkausi on globaalisti ollut olemassa, mutta mikään uudempi lämpötilahistoriatutkimus ei tue sen olemassaoloa: https://t.co/C2TPFLQWho https://t.co/pt
@PullNews @agentsinaction @ejwwest @Ceist8 @RSalgadoDArcy Vinòs claims there has been a simultaneous medieval warm period. Wrong. He uses a reconstruction of T+ of 30N-90N as the world temp. Not correct. Neukon et al 2019. No evidence for globally cohere
@UncleleClub1 @M1guelSuna @ErkkilaJorma 1/2: Mitään globaalia pikku jääkautta ei nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan ole ollut olemassa: https://t.co/C2TPFLQWho https://t.co/rX6uj6S0IR
@SchneidGabriel @Hamersteen @BMcNoldy Just fucking no: https://t.co/7WhPL5HrF0
@MatzyOw @Jallu2353569513 @hjalla_aho @FolioTuukka @naukuvanaakka Nykykäsityksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa (kuva ja linkki). Lämpenemisen vaikutukset tulevaisuudessa kaiken tutkimuskirjallisuuden mukaan ovat pääsääntöis
@RandomRation @fredco1948 Yet there is no evidence the little ice age was a global event https://t.co/WaFdXehYUl
@Pinheir58339900 @GeraldKutney Again you are not reading any actual science https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@kissingtruth @rozjonez @RogerCoppock @Ceist8 The MWP was not global though https://t.co/WaFdXehYUl
@TopAlliedAceWW1 Yeah, global temperature reconstructions happened. Now there's plenty of evidence that says those events were regional. https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/zuplyquvFc
RT @ed_hawkins: No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era https://t.co/TNRYpdlTI2
@Lukas18865903 @MeteoprognozaPL @PogodaMeteo @mariog5tw Mapa winnic w Szkocji. MWP było lokalne, dotyczyło głównie Europy, a nie globalne jak obecnie. https://t.co/3ig9HZQcwY https://t.co/u8EcHAAuVf
@Tartoquetsches1 @thopelep @Europhobe Non, il n'y a pas eu d'optimum climatique mondial. Ce fut une succession de phénomènes régionaux non synchronisés. https://t.co/ipZaRzjbp7
@VapausVille @juliasangervo UHI-efekti ei taida kovin olennaisesti selittää havaittua lämpenemistä, kun meretkin kuitenkin lämpenevät kuvien (1 & 2) malliin. Pientä jääkautta ei ole globaalisti ollut nykytutkimuksen käsityksen mukaan (3. kuva): https:/
RT @agentsinaction: @S_Metzeler @RSalgadoDArcy Stopy lying. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF
@S_Metzeler @RSalgadoDArcy You are too dumb for me. You are such an id*ot, I don't have time for you, stupid kid and troll. You will never get the basic things, a 3yo child can understand. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF https://t.co/cqkMbqsy8T
RT @Ceist8: @JanNordhagen2 @badmoonrising11 @Bazthebemused @peakaustria None of them are GLOBAL studies. They are individual studies from d…
@JanNordhagen2 @badmoonrising11 @Bazthebemused @peakaustria You linked to a crank blog with a map with individual studies from different locations over different time periods. Many are not temperature proxies. See: "No evidence for globally coherent warm
@badmoonrising11 @JanNordhagen2 @Bazthebemused @peakaustria "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" Study is based on 692 proxies from 648 locations showing the MWP was not global & not warmer than t
RT @Ceist8: @JanNordhagen2 @badmoonrising11 @Bazthebemused @peakaustria None of them are GLOBAL studies. They are individual studies from d…
@JanNordhagen2 @badmoonrising11 @Bazthebemused @peakaustria None of them are GLOBAL studies. They are individual studies from different locations over different time periods. Many are not temperature proxies. Study based on 692 proxies from 648 location
@S_Metzeler @RSalgadoDArcy That's a dumb Google Map made by a fossil fuel industry employees with many studies from different time epochs. Ever asked why the author never made a paper comparing it? Well, there here are two: https://t.co/Oj4VXLPigK https:
@S_Metzeler @RSalgadoDArcy Stop lying, troll. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF
@RobertWager1 @RSalgadoDArcy No, it wasn't. Even if your bath tube was warmer back then. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF
@S_Metzeler @RSalgadoDArcy Stop lying. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF
@S_Metzeler @RSalgadoDArcy Stopy lying. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF
@S_Metzeler @RSalgadoDArcy You do realize that the warm periods in your graphs are not synchronous. Do you? That's a critical request to claim the _Earth_ was warmer. Neukom et al. 2019: No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the pr
@isa_picard @DeadheadJP99 @guardianeco Wait, what? You believe that the global warming should be the same everywhere? No, there are both temporal and geographic variability in the climate. https://t.co/k5MqAeEAIH
@Mcsceptical @Matthew_SSmall @ChrisMartzWX Did you notice the warming&cooling times were longer? MWP and RWP were REGIONAL. Today's warming is GLOBAL, as can clearly be seen below. At no point in these periods were the GLOBAL temperatures even remotel
RT @TWTThisIsNow: @I_NOAA_Guy @MichaelEMann Q: Why do "skeptics" still obsess over a 20th century graph by Dr. Michael Mann, the general re…
Thank you for information: #climatechange
RT @TWTThisIsNow: @I_NOAA_Guy @MichaelEMann Q: Why do "skeptics" still obsess over a 20th century graph by Dr. Michael Mann, the general re…
RT @TWTThisIsNow: @I_NOAA_Guy @MichaelEMann Q: Why do "skeptics" still obsess over a 20th century graph by Dr. Michael Mann, the general re…
RT @TWTThisIsNow: @I_NOAA_Guy @MichaelEMann Q: Why do "skeptics" still obsess over a 20th century graph by Dr. Michael Mann, the general re…
RT @original_lego11: @Stashiv82 @eaglehibma Medieval warm period! Which was NOT a global phenomenon (as consistent with evidence) https:/…
@Stashiv82 @eaglehibma Medieval warm period! Which was NOT a global phenomenon (as consistent with evidence) https://t.co/YLrQBolWI4
RT @Ceist8: @zauberberg188 @hansjurgConci @VogeliPeter 1. Global temperature over the last 2000 yrs https://t.co/AGhC3e6YKH Discussed here…
@I_NOAA_Guy @MichaelEMann Q: Why do "skeptics" still obsess over a 20th century graph by Dr. Michael Mann, the general results of which have been replicated dozens of times via multiple methods? A: Because they are pseudoskeptics. Here's one of multiple
@MitchP85D @AMoonShot1 @RayStone81 @ErikDavisforNC1 @ChrisMartzWX Nope. Not warmer everywhere at the same time. https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@MitchP85D @RayStone81 @ErikDavisforNC1 @ChrisMartzWX Nope. Misleading again. The medieval warm was not global. A point you consistently ignore. https://t.co/RZPPCHGuJW
RT @Ceist8: @zauberberg188 @hansjurgConci @VogeliPeter 1. Global temperature over the last 2000 yrs https://t.co/AGhC3e6YKH Discussed here…
RT @Ceist8: @zauberberg188 @hansjurgConci @VogeliPeter 1. Global temperature over the last 2000 yrs https://t.co/AGhC3e6YKH Discussed here…
@zauberberg188 @hansjurgConci @VogeliPeter 1. Global temperature over the last 2000 yrs https://t.co/AGhC3e6YKH Discussed here: https://t.co/7TVAdlthEk and https://t.co/TiFUDH6Fym https://t.co/5psB5I5pkG
RT @agentsinaction: https://t.co/It3CpkifrR Ach herje, #Ganteför schwurbelt mal wieder. Unterstellt, dass wohl(!) Osman et al. (https://t.c…
@ChrisMartzWX @Vulcan_hobo No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era https://t.co/dpdVFZ01s4
@ChrisMartzWX No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era https://t.co/wloCQ4DCZ7
Tja, übersetzen sie für sich, wenn sie der Englischen Sprache nicht mächtig sind, die verlinkte Webseite. Dann werden sie Augen machen bezüglich der Aussage.
@8SuperSolo8 @HumansOverShot @RealPureLove @ProfMarkMaslin @CommunityNotes Meanwhile in the world of peer-reviewed science: “No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era” https://t.co/jgo2HIslHW https://t.co/I
https://t.co/It3CpkifrR Ach herje, #Ganteför schwurbelt mal wieder. Unterstellt, dass wohl(!) Osman et al. (https://t.co/Oj4VXLPigK) das MWP aus Ideologie hat verschwinden lassen. "Man darf das nicht anzweifeln".🤦♂️ S. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF
@Mika_Matinlassi @MariPantsar Mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ilmastotutkimuksen nykykäsityksen mukaan ole ollut olemassa, joten nyt menossa oleva lämpeneminen ei ole "palautumista" siitä. https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx https://t.co/ORcQev3whT
@ChrisMartzWX Stop lying. Don't deny science in favor of dumb blogs. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF
@ChrisMartzWX Neukom R, Steiger N, Gómez-Navarro JJ, Wang J, & Werner JP: No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era. Nature 571(7766):550–554, 2019. https://t.co/CPproeNd28
@ChrisMartzWX To pronounce on the global extent of the MWP, the individual proxies on the map need to become part of a so-called proxy stack, which is sync'd in time & validated against modern temps, & used to synthesize a global temp time series (
@EQKimball7 The MWP was was, as the IPCC say, exceptional in WE, Iceland and Greenland. In other areas it was cooler than average. Unlike the modern warming where the whole world is warming contemporaneously. Do you have any evidence to show otherwise? htt
@JoseluisBourne @25_cycle Please refer to Neukom 2019 https://t.co/YLrQBolWI4 (you can use some sci hub service to access the full text if you don't have an university account) https://t.co/fAoSiijh7N
@Kyrre080957 @aeberman12 Incorrect. Not warmer than today and not global. "anthropogenic global warming is not only unparalleled in terms of absolute temperatures, but also unprecedented in spatial consistency within the context of the past 2,000 years."
Il est sur mastodon, typique! 🤡😜🥳
@Quentin__France @Ayledain @MacLesggy @Gazprom Visiblement vous n'avez pas compris ces schémas. Le temps n'est pas sur les axes… Ni le Moyen-Âge Et non, l'optimum médiéval ne fut pas global. Je sais que les moyennes c'est niveau 6e, donc c'est difficile p
@TwitsyItsy @mkeulemans @PvanHouwelingen Verder zijn er tegenwoordig gedetailleerde studies, die heel specifiek kijken: ▶️ of er 'mondiaal synchroon' dergelijke temperatuurvariaties waren (bijv. een MWP in NW-Europa gelijktijdig met Zuid-Amerika etc.) Zo
@ChrisMartzWX Shocking. Just read more current papers than more than 34 years old ones. Really. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF
@apieck @mkeulemans @thenakedburgers @fmeeus1 @MichaelEMann Nee, weinig studies die een "globaal karakter" aan zouden geven. Lamb's handgetekende grafiekje uit 1965 (!) was louter gebaseerd op kronieken uit Midden-Engeland. Er bestonden toen zelfs geen we
@apieck @mkeulemans @thenakedburgers @fmeeus1 @MichaelEMann De 'MWP' was vooral regionaal. Mondiaal gemiddeld ('globally coherent') blijft daar maar weinig van over: https://t.co/jcnKaUFEbZ
@ChrisMartzWX That was 34 years ago... we now know MWP and LIA were not globally significant. Why don't you quote more recent studies ? https://t.co/WaFdXehYUl
@MattaPirkko @masalayno @Demarinaiset_fi @Demarit @TyttiTup @ELintonen 1/2 Tässä olet täysin vanhentuneen käsityksen vallassa ja olet myös ymmärtänyt ilmastojärjestelmän toiminnan väärin. Nykytutkimuksen mukaan ennen teollistumisen alkua ei ole ollut mitää
@trundimolisher @Frnc_prep @satguy01 @TonyClimate Warmists don't deny the global scope of the MWP, the evidence does https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL
@AntiguaMoses @JulesBywaterLee @Credalytics @eaglehibma The little ice age was not globally coherent. It began and ended at different times in different places. The modern warming is quite different. https://t.co/szcr3uY50R
@Derimot_no @Belectriz @LeonSimons8 No, it wasn't. Sorry but you've been misled. https://t.co/1h8QhUumP9
@carbra80 @JimSteeleSkepti @mkeulemans Right, so there’s no evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era. Wait, why does that sentence sound familiar? https://t.co/GlI81qsGaZ
Wat de overige onderwerpen in de film betreft, had ik graag deze onderzoeken vermeld gezien: 1. https://t.co/2xflsvdyZd 2. https://t.co/GD5cmeRH82 3. https://t.co/AqMToMJyAU 4. https://t.co/7YvusKIMjv) 21/21
@DrDare2care @ed_hawkins I would explain it by pointing out that no, it was indeed not hotter then, nor at anytime in the last 2-3 million years. https://t.co/a9rG9RWDEF
@ER_Korhola Missään globaalissa paleoklimatologisessa lämpötilarekonstruktiossa viimeisen n. 10 vuoden ajalta MWP ei kyllä juuri näy (kuva + linkki): https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx https://t.co/uua4lPc4bx
@SacktheJudge @PaulHBeckwith None of those were global and none of them were warmed than today. https://t.co/W9mfjaI5ef
@PoyetPatrice @robinmonotti Oh I've not seen any graphs that show the little ice age or MWP where globally significant? Proxies where taken from Greenland. There have been some significant and wide ranging studies into it such as the one here...https://t.c
@icebergerjager @STTuutiset Sinun tietosi ilmastohistoriasta ovat näköjään aika heikkoja, @icebergerjager. Mitään globaali pientä jääkautta, jos nyt "toivuttaisiin" ei nykytutkimuksen mukaan ole ollut olemassa: https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx https://t.co/ukuKX5qW
@GauteNilsen @ProfMarkMaslin @X @elonmusk The warming from the last ice age levelled off about 7,000 years ago. Also the Little Ice Age was a regional rather than a global event. - https://t.co/cesaJ70NoD - https://t.co/uGkl5uqqPA - https://t.co/fnYGbU6XO
Here’s the problem. The climate is warming. No credible evidence it’s caused by CO2 and no credible evidence it will be catastrophic.Most people live in the tropics where there will be little change. I was in Iceland. Museum has petrified trees-big ones. G