@KoposenVille @KoomikkoKivi @PeuraTuomo @hurumdara2 Nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa, joten kyse ei nyt ole mistään palautumisesta siitä. https://t.co/VSFlk9CBo7 https://t.co/vB6mzz8SAY
@WeRone777 @waxlithical @herrbartlett1 @ProfMarkMaslin @FrannyArmstrong @globalhlthtwit @arhobley @ClimateHuman @coxypm @_richardblack @ExtinctionR @XRebellionUK @JustStop_Oil No, they weren't world wide, they didn't even connect to later or earlier warmer
@gargantuandwarf @Brody_wx @wildweatherdan I know the difference between quackery and cited science. You can "believe" all you want. Maybe that's your problem. Believing weirdness instead of trusting empirical evidence and cited expert testimony. 216 citat
@gargantuandwarf @MakkakeShakkake @Brody_wx @wildweatherdan HAHAHAHA!!! Spare me your quackery... Show me some cited science articles.. Not some denier opinions. Local anomalies are hardly global trends. https://t.co/QVidOglMID
@blackcarat95 @AssoClimatoReal @DRaziick Elle me fume cette publi ! Ma première courbe parle littéralement de "hémisphère nord"! La carte quand à elle est publiée sur un réseau social et n'est pas revue par les pairs. Contrairement à cet article de Nature
@AssoClimatoReal Ça me fume ! La légende du premier graphe est littéralement "northerm hémisphere". L'optimum médiéval n'était pas global... https://t.co/4p9purWgFM
Here's some dis-disinformation with a clear chart and a link to the original source.
@JunkScience #ClimateScam 1. MWP, RWP weren't global events. https://t.co/IR457Tnd99 "we find no evidence for preindustrial globally coherent cold and warm epochs." 2. not just tree rings...multiple statistical methods, many sources: tree rings, glacial
@dakppc @hausfath @CopernicusECMWF False. The MWP and LIA were regional and barely a blip on the long term cooling trend that started some 8000 years ago. https://t.co/puqR7wNSrC https://t.co/Bv4u5CwJFu
@_ClimateCraze Meanwhile back on planet earth and in peer-reviewed science: https://t.co/jgo2HIslHW https://t.co/VII3Z0e6hS
@AlexStarling77 @TheDisproof @bbcweather @PeteMitch80 "Sigh. What" "previous warm periods? The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindus
@_ClimateCraze When are we going to stop "thawing out" John? https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/99Akm1577N
@M0JEC Sigh. The graphic does show 2022 bars, one for each year from 1AD to 2022. It is our best estimate of *global* average temperature from @PAGES_IPO. The warm periods you mention were *not* globally coherent. https://t.co/TNRYpdlTI2
@Redoubtably10 @MatthewWielicki @ScienceNotDogma Not if you look at global average temperature https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/LF1MLycJLx
@MJonSP @CoopwrJ @EliotJacobson @BruceTabor8 I don't deny that the medieval warm period and little ice age happened but available evidence shows that they were not global, e.g. https://t.co/fnYGbU6XOm
@MKartesalo @SarasvuoJari 1/2 Tämän vuosituhannen aikana tehdyn lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen perusteella mitään pientä jääkautta ei globaalisti ole ollut olemassa. Ennen kuin postittelee disinformaatiota asiasta, kannattaisi oikeasti tutustua siihen uusimp
@LaneyGH @JustStop_Oil @Everton @NUFC Mr Bean vs peer reviewed science... 🙄 https://t.co/6uUJCfNivz
RT @Ceist8: @_ClimateCraze No, there are no GLOBAL temperature reconstructions that show the MWP and RWP were warmer than today, because th…
@bruce_juhl @Walley_Pike @TonyClimate Other researchers have corroborated Mann's findings but of course you'll just keep on denying every bit of evidence that doesn't fit your beliefs https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL
@bruce_juhl @Walley_Pike @TonyClimate Do you accept the findings of this peer reviewed study? https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL
@_ClimateCraze No, there are no GLOBAL temperature reconstructions that show the MWP and RWP were warmer than today, because they weren't. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019
@SophieLCooper @AnneFroment @ProfMarkMaslin @alexdeakin @ed_hawkins Also, you are overestimating the so called mini ice age. There isn't even much evidence to say that were a global cooling in 1800's, much less a big one. The global graph also zoom the las
@Climate_Earth20 @seraphus7 @_ClimateCraze The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 htt
@icebergerjager @MTVUutiset Elämme hyvin todennäköisesti lämpimintä jaksoa viimeisen 100 000 vuoden aikana, ja nykytutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei edes ole ollut olemassa. Miksi yhä levität disinformaatiota, vaikka jäät siitä jatkuv
@NotTheSame_Cord @Jamery17 @climate_ice East Asia is not global "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d776VvzAH6… 📷 https://t.co/RINK2CogO1
@NotTheSame_Cord @Jamery17 @climate_ice The MWP was NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d776VvzAH6 htt
@dave__anthony @IrishDad16 @rtenews That's nonsense. And MWP wasn't globally warm everywhere at the same time. https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@smithy7773 @BernieSpofforth You obviously missed this post. https://t.co/etU7B5uu5U
@smithy7773 @BernieSpofforth You're wrong. 🤷♂️ The MWP was not GLOBAL & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d
@Gazzagunna @wingod @DoctorVive Seems like you don’t have any evidence. However, here’s a study in Nature refuting the claim that the Medieval Warm Period refutes global warming or was even a global phenomenon: https://t.co/wTENLH8YDI
RT @Ceist8: @RRestermann @MartinMeinung The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for g…
@RobertWager1 @CharlieJGardner Well, no. Your graph is from 2013, the revised new information is from 2019. You are using out of date information. https://t.co/rv1FCt8zKe
@RRestermann @MartinMeinung The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d776V
@EigentreuLutz @DemInschenoer @CScharun Wenn sie dann Lesen und empfiehlt Englisch gelernt haben, empfehle ich dies: https://t.co/ZFbyZieIe1
@roelfjans @robinmonotti @25_cycle The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d7
@laulavajoutsen @SarasvuoJari Et ilmeisesti tiedä lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksesta juuri mitään? Viimeisen 20 vuoden aikana tehty ko. tutkimus osoittaa hyvin vahvasti, että mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa. https://t.co/E8c3zM36rr http
@GhostOfCorkey @TorquilMacneil @Schafernaker @DAaronovitch You're more likely to get reliable answers from Google Scholar or Web of Science than ChatGPT. However, this is your five-year-old red herring that's going putrid, so I'm not sure why you're handi
@splantyboy @robinmonotti MWP and LIA not global in scope. Try again. https://t.co/vzV2LyXvxo
@Ardelar @meteomostoles @Xilef_AB Entiendo perfectamente la diferencia entre causación y correlación , y no es "un conjunto de datos" tomados así sin réplica. No voy a entrar en un debate estéril sobre causa/efecto, la evidencia científica es aplastante, p
@Retail_Stonks @Valavuori Näin ajateltiin vielä viime vuosisadalla hyvin hataran näytön perusteella. Nykyisen lämpötilatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa, eikä nyt menossa oleva lämpeneminen ole "palautumista siitä.
RT @CitocromoB1: Félix da una clase maestra de cómo espantar cuñados con evidencia científica y menos de 280 caracteres. Un paper important…
@Hamersteen @OlivierReports @Saskia19052011 @DieTukkerfries @Nelliejs501 Exactly. The MWP was NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom e
Félix da una clase maestra de cómo espantar cuñados con evidencia científica y menos de 280 caracteres. Un paper importante 👇
@NiemisenPete @AtteHarjanne Käsitys siitä, että olisi ollut jokin globaali pieni jääkausi, josta nyt palauduttaisiin, on lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksessa hylätty viimeisen 20 vuoden aikana täysin. Kuviossa nykyinen käsitys globaalista lämpötilakehityksestä 2
@BertaGDeVega Sí, el roman warm period o la pequeña edad del hielo son muy interesantes. A meteomostoles se le olvida alguna cosilla, como asignar a procesos regionales del pasado escalas globales como las de ahora: pero él está por encima de esas nimiedad
@HillaTolppa @hsfi Etkö tiedä, että nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään pientä jääkautta globaalisti ei ole ollut olemassa? Perehdy asioihin, ennen kuin kommentoit. Kukaan ei tarvitse näissä asioissa disinformaatiota. https://t.co/E8c3zM36r
@mooncat951 @KevinGromley @ejwwest @_ClimateCraze The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019
@Pendolare148 @Leonardobecchet @Alberto_Muttley @OfficialTozzi @Charlie_Sampei Nel breve filmato, se lo riguardi attentamente, c'è un rimando ad uno studio autorevole ... 🙄 https://t.co/pPwWFmZqLS
@j_makr @MariPantsar Nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa. Kannattaisiko ensin opiskella asiaa, ennen kuin varmalla äänellä alkaa väittää sitä jotain? https://t.co/E8c3zM36rr https://t.co/xeKN
@captain_cht @hszillat @MullerBoje @rosenbusch_ Weil niemand sagt, dass es in der Vergangenheit keine lokalen (!) Warnzeiten gab. Was es mindestens in den letzten 400k Jahren nicht gab, war eine globale Erwärmung dieses Ausmaßes. https://t.co/ZFbyZieaot ht
@JukkaH9 @MariPantsar Ja mitään globaalia pientä jääkauttahan ei uusimman lämpötilatutkimuksen mukaan ole ollut olemassa. https://t.co/E8c3zM36rr https://t.co/qBW7NWulCo
@JSVoutilainen @MariPantsar @JSVoutilainen, nykytutkimuksen mukaan mitään poikkeuksellisen kylmää, globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut. Paikallisia kyllä. Perehdy ilmastoasioihin ennen kuin kommentoit niitä somessa. https://t.co/E8c3zM36rr https://t.co
RT @Xilef_AB: Podemos hacer trampas al solitario, pero ni el óptimo romano, ni la pequeña edad de hielo, ni el periodo cálido medieval, ni…
RT @Xilef_AB: Podemos hacer trampas al solitario, pero ni el óptimo romano, ni la pequeña edad de hielo, ni el periodo cálido medieval, ni…
RT @Xilef_AB: Podemos hacer trampas al solitario, pero ni el óptimo romano, ni la pequeña edad de hielo, ni el periodo cálido medieval, ni…
Podemos hacer trampas al solitario, pero ni el óptimo romano, ni la pequeña edad de hielo, ni el periodo cálido medieval, ni otros fenómenos similares ocurridos desde el último máximo glaciar fueron fenómenos globales, y lo que estamos viviendo ahora sí. h
@meteomostoles Olvidas un dato que invalida tu planteamiento: ni el óptimo romano, ni la pequeña edad de hielo, ni otros fenómenos similares ocurridos desde el último máximo glaciar fueron fenómenos globales, y lo que estamos viviendo ahora sí. https://t.c
@Goldfiinger77 The paper was about the Mediterranean Sea surface temperatures. Rome isn't IN the Mediterranean sea 😉 And Italy is NOT GLOBAL https://t.co/jODz0kUZNL
@Goldfiinger77 The MWP & Roman periods were regional NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d776VvzA
@Luegendetektor @BernhardRv @JensRittmeier @R1kk1T1kk1Tavi @rosenbusch_ Und wieder gelogen. Ihr Optima waren lokal, Troll (s. https://t.co/ZLQQcUEhuS). https://t.co/BixEV4cqgD
@BioTurvaMies @NiklasKaskeala Keskiajan lämmin jakso ja pieni jääkausi ovat vanhentunutta 1900-luvun käsitystä, joka joutaisi hylätä. Muut "argumenttisi" jätän omaan arvoonsa. Kun et pysty lähteillä perustelemaan levittelemiäsi virhekäsityksiä, voisitko lo
@DarrellBendall @weedadvisor1 @MikeHudema There is a lot of evidence these warm periods were not global in scale. Moreover climate does not have a scientific "optimum." https://t.co/fOP9mxZeaP
@Glenda23803668 @OwenJones84 Utterly false. The MWP was a regional event, not a global one and was NOT warmer than today. Not by a long shot. https://t.co/puqR7wNSrC
@Jet_iiv @AdamFit45249570 @banthebbc 2) The warm periods you mention were not global events. https://t.co/0KR77F6Ajk https://t.co/6T6wgw2mlR
@michell22563770 @Noiregoutte Comparer une perturbation climatique locale avec un phénomène globale est non sens. Surtout quand les relevés climatique montre un refroidissement localisé dû à des phénomènes climatiques épisodique comme des éruptions continu
@ValeSais @DCoon426 @boblister_poole Maybe consider.. https://t.co/x5hrelNEg3
@ontopic_nl @mkeulemans Deze grafiek zegt iets over een *globale* trend. De WMP was een periode van lokale hogere temperaturen in de North Atlantic. Proxies zien dat de globale temperatuur geen grote stijging had in deze periode (zoals te zien in de grafie
@hraphanidousai @ProfMarkMaslin @gene_mccluskey https://t.co/aDI56ktG9T It's not an appeal to authority. It's calling out YOUR incoherence in accepting one theory by experts and rejecting another theory. You're completely biased.
RT @Damo__73_: @lord_juli @johnbarwood1 @peakaustria "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common…
@KJarvan @IlvesToomas Tsiteeritav teadusartikkel on mitu korda ümber lükatud, sh https://t.co/6R171Q6xtx ja https://t.co/gjl6wET2sR
@lord_juli @johnbarwood1 @peakaustria "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL
@RealLucjusz @jakubwiech @PoGOOD Ponownie, nie ma żadnych dowodów, że MWP i LIA byky globalne https://t.co/3ig9HZQcwY
@MrEel34494321 @etelanmies @MariaOhisalo Suomesta ei ole kattavaa aikasarjaa 2000 vuoden päähän, mutta tässä yksi rajoitettuun proksiaineistoon perustuva aikasarja. Roomalainen lämpökausi ja pieni jääkausi eivät nykytutkimuksen mukaan olleet mitää globaale
@slick0901 @toadmeister They haven't. https://t.co/CUgOFuKyob
@DrEvaBernat @goddeketal Wrong. Contrary to what many AGW deniers claim, the Roman period & MWP were NOT GLOBAL & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era"
@QueenAl3xandra @ret_ward Projection. Yes, do some research. MWP wasn't global. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF https://t.co/jvItXmLXmg
RT @tan123: 1. Lots of peer-reviewed studies here show a Medieval Warm Period outside of Europe, at places all around the globe. Why should…
@RealLucjusz @jakubwiech @PoGOOD Uwaga, w toku badań zmieniono projekcje dawnych temp, w tym MWP, które okazuje się lokalnym fenomenem rozciągniętym w czasie. Na pewno kłamio! https://t.co/3ig9HZQcwY
@CarbonCriminal Contrary to what many AGW deniers claim, the Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al
@a_silver31 @ProfMarkMaslin @TheBardOfAnlaby @gene_mccluskey This is more recent. https://t.co/g2VbpaTcdY
@dkerr12345 @hausfath The LIA was a regional trend, not a global one, but part of the long term trend going back to the Holocene Maximum some 8000 years ago after which the planet started cooling very slowly. Then BOOM, sudden supersonic warming by compari
RT @Ceist8: @BatcaveSlimer @timjones1001 @Zane1968 @LeeSmit00241611 @_ClimateCraze Yes. Contrary to what many AGW deniers claim, the Roman…