@Gisi24509 @climacritic Ci si potrebbe domandare come mai l'autore, che ha dimostrato altre volte di conoscere questi studi, li nasconda sistematicamente nascondendosi dietro a ipotesi vecchie di 35 anni e più. Qui un altro esempio di ricostruzione recent
@StahlmannRolf @MrJonasDanner Oder hier 🤷🏼 https://t.co/I9F6gsMbTH
@FuturesPicks @AlexEpstein @yaronbrook You're not a science guy, are you. In science peer reviewed scientific papers > lay social media community notes, and by a very large margin. Here's another of the dozens of peer reviewed scientific papers showin
@NorbertNozy @Teoli2003 @monkey449 @curryja Those were small blips and not globally warm all at the same time https://t.co/qLBQ7llqSF
@doom37455413 @TheOmeg55211733 @LockwoodIngers1 @TonyClimate There are not hundreds of peer reviewed papers that say those periods were global. In fact I doubt you can cite one. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustri
@LucMangnus @Mynameismud09 @NMohob @wideawake_media Norway is not the world. Regional is not global. Medieval and Roman warm periods were not warmer *globally* than the current period. You are the one without any evidence for your claims. https://t.co/k6
@CryptoPlissken @Kootenaybob0 @CO2Coalition @FriendsOScience Contrary to what many AGW deniers claim, the Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindust
RT @Ceist8: @Kootenaybob0 @CO2Coalition @FriendsOScience The MWP was NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally co…
@Kootenaybob0 @CO2Coalition @FriendsOScience The MWP was NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d776VvzAH6 Th ht
@icebergerjager @JenniPitko 1/2 Tutustupa sinä itse ajantasaiseen ilmastohistoriaan, joka kertoo sinulle, että mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa, eikä nyt menossa oleva globaali lämpeneminen ole siten palautumista siitä: https://t.co/
@GaetanoCriscen2 @Giulio_Firenze Salve, in realta sono distinti eccome. Lo si vede dal grafico sopra, lo si vede da questo studio. https://t.co/O2vIX1JFUE
@Giulio_Firenze su questo argomento, segnalo anche: https://t.co/ejKahS7NBs
@Al_Gorelioni @GrahamLKeegan Meanwhile back on planet earth, again dozens of peer-reviewed scientific studies have created “hockey sticks”: https://t.co/2sYlfjpYrv Here's a hockey stick published in 2019: https://t.co/jgo2HIslHW https://t.co/UbjUA4wQHW
@GeorgeSchulte @AdamBandt I didn't ignore your graphs at all. What paper is that temperature reconstruction from? Here's a third paper from a highly respected and long standing journal for you to reject https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/nLFsc1JgKk
@TonyClimate @GOP He didn't erase anything Tony. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL
@GrahamLKeegan Regional phenomena, not global. “No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era”. Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/u4UBTV8I6T
@TherealCurtJ @TonyClimate I think you're misinformed https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/xhynz6DSAq
@JaredJMccracken @akaelwopo1 @CO2Coalition 1. This paper refers to one region 2. https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL 3. I accept the findings of this research
@CWebbe @JunkScience No, at least not globally. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF https://t.co/Oj4VXLPigK
@JaredJMccracken @akaelwopo1 @CO2Coalition Here’s a graph showing global proxy data for the last two thousand years published in Nature (just as long standing and respected as Science) https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/WpnzIsIGzO
RT @Ceist8: @CO2Coalition @CO2Coalition The Medieval Warm Period was NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence fo…
@CO2Coalition @CO2Coalition The Medieval Warm Period was NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d776VvzA
9/16 De novo, em 2019, utilizando proxys espalhados pelo mundo, um artigo na @Nature mostrou que não há evidência concreta de que o clima GLOBAL estava mais quente ou mais frio na era medieval. https://t.co/xBMSptSLyi
@Neffton1 @StahlmannRolf Lassen Sie mich raten. Selbstdenker, stimmt's? https://t.co/ufowGi8V86
RT @Ceist8: @MrSalvenStadl @Royalacresrod Contrary to what many AGW deniers claim, the Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer…
@MrSalvenStadl @Royalacresrod Contrary to what many AGW deniers claim, the Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom e
@philhuwedwards @JohnMashey @RARohde @john_p_rafferty 'Personal interpretation' does not pass muster. The essential point is to analyse the spatiotemporal coherency. Just looking at a collection of papers, each about an individual (!) area... only suggest
@philhuwedwards @JohnMashey @RARohde @john_p_rafferty No, your second sentence is completely at odds with the scientific findings. Neukom 2019: https://t.co/jcnKaUFEbZ https://t.co/rbwWCHqVCz
@philhuwedwards @JohnMashey @RARohde @john_p_rafferty So some regions were colder, some regions warmer... As it happens since _regional_ climate tends to show more variability than the global average. Distinguishing feature of the CURRENT man-made warming
@philhuwedwards @JohnMashey @RARohde @john_p_rafferty I don't think 'Wiki' is a scientific publication, isn't it? Those years are way to handwaving. The actual analysis is in the Neukom et al 2019 publication in Nature: https://t.co/jcnKaUFEbZ https://t.
@philhuwedwards @JohnMashey @RARohde @john_p_rafferty But those were not globally coherent warm (or cold), at the same time as Greenland. Please see Neukom 2019 about this: https://t.co/jcnKaUFEbZ
@ute_lias @PauliVahtera 1/2 Nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa, joten nyt menossa oleva lämpeneminen ei ole mitään "palautumista" siitä. Ja jos tosiaan uskot, että viikinkiaikana Grönlanniss
@Tigercuddles74 @GMB In the last 2000 years there has never been a planet-wide change in climate (including The Little Ice Age) but now there is. That and the speed of change is the difference. If you think this is wrong I look forward to reading your reb
@Markus2vara @JonneKorhonen1 @Demarit @MarinSanna Nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia "mini jääkautta" ei ole ollut olemassa: https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx https://t.co/k4VoJaXjSw
@KorlDa @Klimakatastroph Korl, nein. Warum? ⬇️ https://t.co/BH1LnIbuOr
@Ylikessu @KalleKaasujalka 2/2 ... pois. Nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa: https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx https://t.co/IcrMBRmqFx
@RomanLasota @VolkerErb Und wieder weiter mit dem Wissenschaftsleugnen und den Strohmännern, weil Sie komplett ahnungslos und "quer" sind. Es gab die MWP, aber sie war nicht global (https://t.co/Sj1WDVPpHd). Sie haben den Unterschied zw. lokal und global n
@bargar_s24084 @DawnTJ90 @DrJamesEHansen @NASAGISS @NASAClimate GISTEMP only goes back to 1880, Berkeley Earth, NOAA and HadCRUT go back to 1850. They had several thousand weather stations globally back then and there was water temperature data taken by t
@PaulRobEsq @youpieceofsilva @RyanMaue Boy have I ever! That's why I know your screenshots are as worthless as you are. Now pay close attention- unlike uneducated and pathetic deniers, I show my sources. https://t.co/pYcQYftHgj https://t.co/BQRYuSGmhr
@JukkaH9 2/n ... ja kaikki uusin lämpötilahistoriatutkimus kertoo siitä, että mitään ns. pientä jääkautta ei globaalisti ole ollut olemassa. Paikallisia kylmiä kausia kyllä. Olet siis tässäkin asiassa uusimman tutkimuksen mukaan väärässä. https://t.co/gWVb
@jukka_keskitalo @RistoSantti Uusimman lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalisti selvästi erottuvaa poikkeuksellisen kylmää pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa. https://t.co/E8c3zM36rr https://t.co/hqBgUw3TSW
@davidsmythe069 @DavidUllrich202 Again. Nature study not BS https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@davidsmythe069 @Bazthebemused @DavidUllrich202 Already answered. Not globally warm everywhere at the save time. Too difficult a concept for you? Science deniers generally do not understand time https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@davidsmythe069 @Bazthebemused @DavidUllrich202 I suggest you read. It wasn't globally warm everywhere at the same time. A very important concept https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@latimeralder @walkermartyn @UN What experiments do you think climate scientists should be doing? Observations are at the core of climate science https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/gRwxL2NGpC
@JunkScience Single location data that ends long ago vs global average data https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/m5PhVhNSRI
@eskimosikyung @quasirob @CO2Coalition Factoring in the other hemisphere it works perfectly for my position. https://t.co/7WhPL5HZuy https://t.co/cT4t3WESVz https://t.co/xdD4yUsCko
@CO2Coalition Regional data that end long before the current day says nothing about global warming. This is global average data using multiple proxies https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/C0UlnJDTcX
@emilper @mihaiam @skdh Not everywhere all at the same time. I realize this is a difficult concept for you. https://t.co/qLBQ7llqSF
@emilper @skdh Not globally. Not globally all at the same time. Your ignorance is obvious https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@roger_farmboy @ChrisPaboRhee @JunkScience You’re just being a silly troll
@emilper @skdh Why do you lie? https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@Daaanvdb @CO2Coalition Global temperature reconstructions show the Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom
@ChrisPaboRhee @JunkScience The Medieval and Roman periods were regional not global, and they were not warmer than today "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https://t.co/d776
@Resista05992670 @MrMatthewTodd The MWP was at best a regional event, affecting no more than 40% of the globe at any single point in time. Modern warming, in contrast, is globally coherent, affecting 98% of the planet, which is utterly unprecedented. As is
@JunkScience Looks like single location data from ice cores. This is global data from multiple proxy data sources https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/2Hxut92Ja8
@Tippling @StephanWeberHd @Regenbogenprin1 @SchneidGabriel @RobertoBelinzo2 @HolzheuStefan @MathiasPriebe Sind eh nur die ganzen dummen Lügen der Trolle. Fängt an mit Bild-Zeitung, einem Fake (https://t.co/zOK3CnxFhg), Unsinn mit Google Maps (LOL) von eine
@AriOkkonen @HuhtasaariSaara @OssiTiihonen Kuva IPCC AR6WG1. Mitään pientä jääkauttahan ei muuten globaalina, selvästi erottuvana yhtenäisenä kautena ole nykyisen paleoklimatologisen tutkimuksen perusteella edes ollut olemassa. Puheesi LIA:sta "toipumisest
@ray_vingnutter @MRobertsQLD Everything I said is true. Look it up. Earth wasn't warmer globally at all. Regional warming doesn't equal global warming. https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/BSXEz2azUj
@MatthewWielicki Several dozen replications of Mann’s work using a host of different proxies and methods. Wielicki is a deceptive junk scientist. #ClimateActionNow #ClimateBrawl https://t.co/L2YtTDRuH1
@Catoto_Fanboy @DrEliDavid @GretaThunberg Not globally warm or cooler everywhere at the same time. You have no argument layman https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@TimRealityDE @_ClimateCraze @ClimateOfGavin To pronounce on the global extent of the MWP, the individual proxies on the map need to become part of a so-called proxy stack, which is sync'd in time & validated against modern temps, & used to synthes
@Petteri76 @hsfi Jos olisit vähän tutustunut uudempaan lämpötilahistoriatutkimukseen, tietäisit, että nykykäsityksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ollut olemassa. Kannattaa perehtyä aiheisiin, joista xwiittailee. https://t.co/E8c3zM3EgZ http
@KUS96929318 @HMitterwald @cvictordus @HolzheuStefan Auch da ist die Antwort ganz einfach: Es war keine *globale* Erwärmung. Das wurde auch bereits hundert mal durchgekaut. https://t.co/G9GA4METbA https://t.co/bQVKmd7Uhg
@hugh_boner @Climate_Earth20 @Michael7215 That only proves it was warm in that region 2000 years ago. Proxy data shows the RWP wasn't global https://t.co/sd4aAqkLwd
@Luegendetektor @Willi1887H Hören Sie auf, so dreist zu lügen, Troll. https://t.co/vCiNmHfB9Z
@darrell_janzen @BryanLand111980 @desertveteran @JohnStossel @dawnegray3 @curryja That's data for one location in Greenland that ends long before today This is global data https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/Bn6xUK2VnQ
@GalvezDidier1 @AntipolisMy @AssoClimatoReal Aucune simultanéité dans les variations préindustrielles. https://t.co/ipZaRzjbp7