Otro punto a resaltar es que no hay evidencias de que la "Pequeña Edad de Hielo" se produjera de manera global. https://t.co/0jbldz4Yud
@Horrux @lasallia01 @bambkb The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. Here's the data: https://t.co/d776VvzAH6 https://t.co/7pLcxMSQE8 "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Com
@Former_Biru @marramiautxape @50percentgayyy @Nanisimo No, te lo has inventado. Fuente: https://t.co/4RF9bj3LJ5 https://t.co/6hT67RcsJO
@JTPilli @kraade @yleuutiset Pielessä tässä ovat lähinnä sinun käsityksesi. Mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei nykytutkimuksen mukaan ole ollut olemassa. https://t.co/C2TPFLQWho https://t.co/GqGi430Etl
@Redoubtably10 @TheDisproof @M17828764Marion @brandondaly2018 @curryja @MatthewWielicki The MWP was regional, NOT global & was not warmer than today. No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era
@PeaknikMicki @GrahamLKeegan The MWP was never global. It was regional. https://t.co/fykezAFHZb https://t.co/dc0BKKBPz5
@DavidAHoward @JunkScience @MichaelEMann MWP wasn't warm globally everywhere at the same time https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@MatzyOw @VainamoinenKale Paikallisia kylmiä ja lämpimiä kausia on viimeisen 2000 vuoden aikana ollut, ennen teollistumista ei globaaleja: https://t.co/C2TPFLQWho
@cogelvale @Ardelar @glezjuanje La prueba fehaciente si existe y hay investigación al respecto. Lo que dice éste señor es una magufada. https://t.co/8DWq2NrN7r
@Buenrolloreturn @nrcrts Básicamente un zoquete inventando pijadas. Lo que dice la ciencia: "No hay evidencias de que haya habido variaciones climáticas a escala mundial en épocas preindustriales tan evidentes como la producida a partir de la misma" htt
@FBreject1 @hausfath MWP, LIA, RWP all were not global. https://t.co/DL74A3RjdT
@ScottDWinder17 Those were localised events and not global. So not relevant to compare to current global warming. Lots of theories about MWP being a result of changing ocean currents at the time. Here is a peer reviewed paper from the nature journal for re
7/11 "Ah mas e os períodos quentes medieval e a pequena era do gelo?" Fenômenos locais que não ocorreram em escala global e que ainda assim não apresentaram uma mudança climática maior do que hoje. https://t.co/xBMSptSLyi
@LaineRjlaine @MariPantsar 1/2: Uusimman lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa (ks. kuvat ja lähde). Kuka on väittänyt, että ilmastonmuutosta ei voi tapahtua ilman ihmistä? Totta kai voi.... https://t.c
RT @PeterBrannen1: @Eaterofsun It probably wasn't everyone back then either https://t.co/ATEu1dhcu1
@Eaterofsun It probably wasn't everyone back then either https://t.co/ATEu1dhcu1
@Ceist8 @brandondaly2018 @MarkBoslough @MatthewWielicki Poor @MatthewWielicki - at least he tried to make his attempts at academic fraud look plausible, unlike #LazyJohn @_ClimateCraze who simply makes up false statements about actual published papers.
RT @Ceist8: @_ClimateCraze Your 20 yr old paper "The Effect of Subtropical Cooling on the Amplitude of ENSO: A Numerical Study", doesn't sa…
@_ClimateCraze Your 20 yr old paper "The Effect of Subtropical Cooling on the Amplitude of ENSO: A Numerical Study", doesn't say anything at all like that. 😂 "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neu
@Robert_Heitner8 @scruztiger @_ClimateCraze Again missing the point. Read the damn paper. It wasn't warm everywhere AT THE SAME TIME. https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@Robert_Heitner8 @scruztiger @_ClimateCraze But that's the ENTIRE point. It wasn't warm everywhere at the same time. https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@Robert_Heitner8 @JimBowersclimb @_ClimateCraze Oh, and the MWP and RWP, along with the LIA were not global. They were regional warming and cooling periods that were the result of heat moving around, not increasing. https://t.co/W9mfjaI5ef
@JunglistXrp @GeraldKutney Science deniers make me laugh. Especially people who don't understand the difference between local and global. https://t.co/dr7oFB1hoz
@JunglistXrp @GeraldKutney No. Get an update. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF https://t.co/Oj4VXLPigK https://t.co/0OSj9i9Mh2 BTW., you shouldn't know who the author od you 13 year old paper is: https://t.co/3BLNWpIPrU https://t.co/ARBoobckyf
@matteo58037618 @OfficialTozzi Volentieri questa è la ricostruzione più accurata (per il momento) degli ultimi 2000 anni https://t.co/EKxwzUhD2L La figura è wiki, ma tratta dall'articolo che allego https://t.co/SthAHdmGgK
@MPMVerm @GAJAJW Not global https://t.co/WaFdXehYUl
@GAJAJW @MPMVerm No..dates don't all correlate, some proxies show no warming, some a small amount and some show cooling....maybe if we had a study of all global proxies that showed mean temperature difference at that time 🤔https://t.co/WaFdXehYUl ....oh wa
@GAJAJW @MPMVerm Genuinely you need to look at current peer reviewed papers that explore these periods. See what actual evidence tells us rather than memes and screenshots without context. The below study in nature is a starter https://t.co/WaFdXehYUl
@AngryLi0n2 @WeatherProf @ClimateCentral Because it wasn’t global. It’s impacts were not felt globally at the same time as modern warming is. https://t.co/DL74A3RjdT
@TimRealityDE @WeatherProf Oh, and, not, those were regional climate anomalies. They did not impact world wide at the same time as is modern warming. https://t.co/DL74A3RjdT
@juhalaine17 @MariPantsar Enpä noilla rahkeilla muiden tietoja arvostelisi, @juhalaine17. Uusin lämpötilahistoriatutkimus nimittäin kertoo vahvasti siitä, että mitään pientä jääkautta ei globaalisti ollut, ja Euroopassakaan se ollut mitenkään erityisen poi
@IhanvaanMiika @AtteHarjanne Lue uusinta ilmastotutkimusta googlen sijaan, niin saat paremman käsityksen asiasta. Sen mukaan viimeisen 2000 vuoden jakson aikana ei nykyaikaa lukuunottamatta ole ollut erityisen kuumia tai kylmiä kausia globaalisti: https://
@VapausVille @MariPantsar Paikallisia lämpimiä kausia oli, mutta uusimman lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan viimeiset 2000 vuotta ovat globaalisti olleet aika tasaisen viileitä: https://t.co/E8c3zM36rr https://t.co/vr0jeMC9H0
@_ClimateCraze Not globally https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@roelfjans @Conservati22375 @TonyClimate @IPCC_CH Here's your surprise: No it doesn't https://t.co/41XxZ95PP0
@TonyClimate Neukom calls you an idiot. I just call you a liar. https://t.co/pYcQYft9qL
@lasee_frank There are literally dozens but you can't show us global data on even one. Here's the most comprehensive single-year cadence, global climate reconstruction using 692 different locations. It says you're wrong. https://t.co/pYcQYft9qL
@GeeEs15 @Diver_Flemming @lasee_frank Then show me the DOI and the raw files that have the data. For example, here's the data set that disagrees with you: https://t.co/f3gIK6FStg https://t.co/pYcQYft9qL
@lasee_frank Not globally all at the same time. Sad you do not understand that word https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@lasee_frank Supposedly, the Medieval Warm Period was a local event on the North Atlantic: https://t.co/RVL6XdPnZI
@lavenderroute @_ClimateCraze Europe is not the world. I have been talking about global temperatures from the start of this discussion. Roman warm period was regional, not global. https://t.co/dVYfX8Eeii https://t.co/oh84aL6XtP
RT @Damo__73_: @_ClimateCraze Actual scientific evidence that it wasn't https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL
@_ClimateCraze Actual scientific evidence that it wasn't https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL
@PeterGi08603862 @Antiesquerda2 @MartinKlocke @MedBennett @SpiruSensei @safcpete67 @Ermentrude112 @TonyClimate "This provides strong evidence that anthropogenic global warming is not only unparalleled in terms of absolute temperatures5, but also unpreceden
@denfin9 @_ClimateCraze Don't be a complete idiot https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@EloAng1 Kolego. Napisałeś, że 500 lat temu było cieplej niż dzisiaj. Pokaż źródło, z którego czerpiesz te rewelacje. W którym czasopiśmie były one opublikowane? Tak bym rzeczywiście mógł to sprawdzić. Na bank nie są to bowiem te badania: https://t.co/fdX
@leakys @ArduinnaT @AssoClimatoReal La chose est assez claire. @Dubiumus a raté une occasion de se taire. Au lieu de raconter n'importe quoi, il aurait dû lire ceci : Neukom et al., No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindust
@zwitscherhanne1 @JohannesKoepl @Schmitt_News Falsch ⬇️
@onlyonebman @BuckCllr @statsjamie No, it wasn't https://t.co/af2AnNRfGg
@Allan22810361 @BuckCllr @statsjamie No it wasn't. The Roman warm period was regional, not global, and was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https:/
@claudiogay4 @David_E8 @RAM_meteo @ame_asociacion @Divulgameteo @climatologia_ua @GeografiaUmu @GeografiaUa @MeteoChatSE @JoannaIvars @aeclim No hay pruebas de periodos cálidos y fríos a escala mundial durante la era preindustrial https://t.co/I4NX3kvmBK
@Camburnclimate @GlennCarr6 @WaltonFA @_ClimateCraze @priscian No, when the proxy data is correlated it shows the MWP was not global and was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era"
@Luegendetektor @KeineAh18060249 @Moncher71221584 Wie immer keine Sachkritik, sondern nur Lügen, weil Sie wissenschaftl. Erkenntnisse (s. Pages2K, Marcott, Mann etc.) leugnen. Und es wurde nichts weggebügelt, Ihr MWP war nur nicht global, Kohle-Troll. http
Finding "no evidence" is not finding "evidence". Let me assure you that if you start out with the intention of not finding evidence, you won't find it. The problem is Dan, there are people out there who, for reasons not clear to me, get their rocks off
@GerardAMorrow "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" Neukom, et al (2019) https://t.co/ZPY0NqboWO https://t.co/ODLMBNdF5f
@Camburnclimate @GlennCarr6 @WaltonFA @_ClimateCraze @priscian Not globally coherent
@Luegendetektor @VolkerErb @mathemitjulian @KeineAh18060249 @Moncher71221584 Hören Sie auf zu lügen, Kohle-Troll. Sie liefern entsprechend für Ihre Lügen ja auch nie Belege - geht ja auch nicht. https://t.co/vCiNmHfB9Z Es gab auch keine "guten Zeiten" - e
RT @Ceist8: @JRHCBM @warwick512 @MayaOfAuckland The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for gl…
@saveme20749471 @nonAlliPetihW @solarpapst @OurWorldInData Warum lügen Sie? https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF https://t.co/Oj4VXLPigK Sie haben nicht mal verstanden, wie solche Rekonstruktionen gehen. Sie langweilen mich. Wenn Sie denselben Quark nur noch wiederh
RT @Ceist8: @JRHCBM @warwick512 @MayaOfAuckland The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for gl…
@JRHCBM @warwick512 @MayaOfAuckland The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" https://t.co/d776VvzAH6 https://t.co/eScul974FP
@BernhardGeyer Gibt noch andere Probleme: 1. Teilweise wurden ganze Gebiete, teilweise nur eine Höhle untersucht 2. Kein Peer-Review, keine Publikation 3. Keine Methoden-Beschreibung Wurde aber wissenschaftl. untersucht: https://t.co/Sj1WDVPpHd (s. auch
@agentsinaction @saveme20749471 @nonAlliPetihW @solarpapst @OurWorldInData The MWP was NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -Neukom et al 2019 https
@saveme20749471 @nonAlliPetihW @solarpapst @OurWorldInData 4. Kein zeitlicher Zusammenhang: Studien beziehen sich auf unterschiedliche Zeitbereiche Der Aussagewert ist also 0. Ein Paper, was eben das macht, kommt zum Ergebnis, dass das MWP nicht global wa
@scubadang722 @Chrisdebois1 @sporglefork It wasn’t an ice age, dumbass. And no amount of displaying the international symbol of right wing douche bag will make it so. https://t.co/W9mfjaI5ef
@OyVeyIzhMir @_ClimateCraze Post a study, not a blog. Such as… https://t.co/W9mfjaI5ef
@Jack_1906 @FrankfurtZack Haben Sie nicht. Und es wird selbstverständlich auch noch immer daran geforscht. https://t.co/XFM5lfbpKu
@PachnerTom @Jack_1906 @FrankfurtZack Den Unterschied zw. lokal und global also nicht verstanden. https://t.co/XFM5lfbpKu
@maxihasi1 @Jack_1906 @FrankfurtZack Und nicht global. https://t.co/XFM5lfaRUW
@Notmycircus56 @Jack_1906 @FrankfurtZack Schreiben Sie nicht so einen Stuss. https://t.co/Sj1WDVPpHd War weder global noch so warm wie heute. Aber klar, eine tumbe Verschwörungsgeschichte klingt da immer besser.
@MPMVerm @scruztiger @jpgcrowley @BatcaveSlimer @Diver_Flemming @MatthewWielicki @TheDisproof Ad hominem is a tacit admission that you acknowledge that you are wrong you can't refute the papers. https://t.co/SBDrSLFJIv
@SpartanSnow35 @JunkScience Your video doesn't agree with you about the LIA. They note that it wasn't global. The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the p
@SpartanSnow35 @reub5ter @JunkScience @socratesccost @CommunityNotes Oops you’re wrong: https://t.co/7WhPL5HZuy
@AlfonsoScoma @JunkScience Not the oil lobbyists. https://t.co/qLBQ7llqSF
@KAkosombo @TonyClimate Indeed. Sorry, I meant to cite the study https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL
@germanniag @StahlmannRolf Es wird nicht wahrer mit bunten Bildchen. https://t.co/YH9VcoeVt2
@WayneBStoltenb1 @TonyClimate No weren't not. Agreed this is a good temperature if we could be sure it wasn't going to keep going past 2 or 3C https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/zZr695DejI
@vzaitsevlaw @RederRaiRai @elonmusk Not globally warm everywhere at the same time. All the other proxy research studies (65 now) find the same hockey stick. You lack knowledge https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@Marko_Tap @MinnaMkinen6 1/2 Mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan ole ollut olemassa, joten nyt menossa oleva globaali lämpeneminen ei ole palautumista siitä: https://t.co/E8c3zM36rr https://t.co/2TPXgSHTIa
@AngstromU @ItsTheAtmospher @CO2Coalition That's not global, is it? Neukom, 2019 is. https://t.co/pYcQYft9qL