Here’s the problem. The climate is warming. No credible evidence it’s caused by CO2 and no credible evidence it will be catastrophic.Most people live in the tropics where there will be little change. I was in Iceland. Museum has petrified trees-big ones. G
@IPonkanen @juliasangervo 3/3 ... takana. Mitään globaalia roomalaista tai keskiajan lämpökautta ei nykykäsityksen mukaan ole ollut olemassa (kuvat ja linkki). Paikallisia lämpimiä ja kylmiä kausia toki on ollut, mutta ne selittyvät meri- ja ilmakehän virt
@dafast Not quite. The point is that past periods of cooling/warming were not globally manifest whereas the marked warming detected over the last 150 - i.e. that linked to widespread FF burning, is. https://t.co/z3XYgzlmKY
@jbs2250 @ProfMarkMaslin @eaglehibma @SustainableUCL @UCLEnvironment @AnthropoceneUCL @UCLgeography @BBCJustinR @LancetCountdown @JustStop_Oil @RogerHallamCS21 The MWP was regional, NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for global
@imefvd @ProfMarkMaslin @SustainableUCL @UCLEnvironment @AnthropoceneUCL @UCLgeography @BBCJustinR @LancetCountdown @JustStop_Oil @RogerHallamCS21 2/2 The MWP was regional, NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally cohere
RT @Ceist8: @coop4316 @JunkScience @NRO @MichaelEMann @priscian #2 The MWP was regional, NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evi…
@coop4316 @JunkScience @NRO @MichaelEMann @priscian #2 The MWP was regional, NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era"- PAGES2K 2019 https://t.co/UnvPtbNsU
@aftonbob7 @SUTONGIROTCIP @Andy_May_Writer MWP, RWP, LIA,, etc we’re regional, not global. https://t.co/W9mfjaI5ef
@GrahamKirk17 @cameron_sayle @collapse2050 No, it doesn't at all. 😂 e.g. https://t.co/b0CJ5YtYyl
@Phaeo17 @MeteoFrance_SE Personne ne prétend que les glaciers n'ont pas été moins longs qu'aujourd'hui. Mais: - ils ne sont pas à l'équilibre (fondre, cela prend du temps) - l'inédit, c'est que le réchauffement est _global_ et pas régional comme avabt. N
@Wirnala1 @OsmoSoininvaara Sellaista ei nykyisen lämpötilahistoriatutkimuksen mukaan ole globaalisti ollut olemassakaan: https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx https://t.co/3m9gsZ6YB2
RT @Ceist8: @socratesccost @clean_air_man The Roman period & MWP were regional, NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence fo…
@socratesccost @clean_air_man The Roman period & MWP were regional, NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -PAGES2k 2019 https://t.co/d776VvzAH6 https
@AshamKoji @ichudov @JunkScience Meanwhile in the world of peer-reviewed science: “No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era” https://t.co/jgo2HIslHW https://t.co/wHF67gNz2j
@CapTweed @PadraigMcEvoy @SadhbhO According to these scientists there is no evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era. https://t.co/TPjQSomzN0
@AntiguaMoses @LabourOutOfScot @WeiZhangAtmos MWP, LIA, RWP…all were regional and not global. And the rate of change in unmatched in the paleo record. https://t.co/W9mfjaI5ef
@JaneMoorho26803 @andrewp109 Meanwhile in back on planet earth, there are literally dozens of papers in peer reviewed scientific journals that reproduce “hockey sticks”. https://t.co/zqC9GRniqo Here's one of many recent hockey sticks: https://t.co/jgo2HIs
@ozzorro1 @scepticsinc Not globally warm everywhere at the same time. https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@Prudro01 @_ClimateCraze Not globally warm or cool everywhere at the same time. https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
RT @Ceist8: @_ClimateCraze The 1990 IPCC schematic was based on Central England temperature & was NOT global The MWP was regional, NOT glo…
RT @Ceist8: @_ClimateCraze I think you mean Clauser and his @CO2Coalition fossil fuel propaganda group "are one of the worst sources of dan…
RT @Ceist8: @_ClimateCraze The 1990 IPCC schematic was based on Central England temperature & was NOT global The MWP was regional, NOT glo…
@coop4316 @eon2030 @JunkScience @IPCC_CH @TonyClimate Yes, read papers, science denier. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF
@coop4316 @eon2030 @JunkScience @IPCC_CH @TonyClimate Stop ignoring science. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF
@coop4316 @peakaustria Sorry, not global, not as much as the warming of today. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF Get the basics before tweeting. https://t.co/Ck5rP1cbdR
RT @Ceist8: @_ClimateCraze I think you mean Clauser and his @CO2Coalition fossil fuel propaganda group "are one of the worst sources of dan…
RT @Ceist8: @_ClimateCraze The 1990 IPCC schematic was based on Central England temperature & was NOT global The MWP was regional, NOT glo…
RT @Ceist8: @ktibus @_ClimateCraze @CO2Coalition John's intentions are to deceive. 1/ The MWP was regional, NOT global & was not warmer th…
@ktibus @_ClimateCraze @CO2Coalition John's intentions are to deceive. 1/ The MWP was regional, NOT global & was not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" PAGES2K 2019 https:
RT @Ceist8: @_ClimateCraze The 1990 IPCC schematic was based on Central England temperature & was NOT global The MWP was regional, NOT glo…
@_ClimateCraze The 1990 IPCC schematic was based on Central England temperature & was NOT global The MWP was regional, NOT global & was not warmer than today. “No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindust
@_ClimateCraze I think you mean Clauser and his @CO2Coalition fossil fuel propaganda group "are one of the worst sources of dangerous disinformation." John Shewchuk knows he's lying. https://t.co/n77p6XlcuO https://t.co/7fS8fojmdg
@Neil_Sullivan_ @JanNordhagen2 @MatthewWielicki @AstroMikeMerri "One has the LIA and MWP equal." Are you on drugs? https://t.co/d8KMu8vV9U
@Neil_Sullivan_ @JanNordhagen2 @MatthewWielicki @AstroMikeMerri If you're talking about this chart, try to actually understand what it says. https://t.co/d8KMu8vV9U
@MatthewWielicki @Neil_Sullivan_ @JanNordhagen2 @AstroMikeMerri You do understand what the word "coherent" means, don't you MattGPT*? https://t.co/d8KMu8vV9U Also have you learned the difference between relative and specific humidity yet? Skeptical minds
RT @Ceist8: @AnneFroment @wsourdeau @LP_LaPresse The Roman period & MWP were regional, NOT global & were not warmer than today.…
@AnneFroment @wsourdeau @LP_LaPresse The Roman period & MWP were regional, NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -PAGES2k 2019 https:/
@Neil_Sullivan_ @JanNordhagen2 @AstroMikeMerri @MatthewWielicki Meanwhile in the world of peer-reviewed science: “No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era” https://t.co/jgo2HIslHW https://t.co/Yl1ENnlipu
@giannipettinari @memiclimatici @CoyaudSylvie @AlbertoAgliotti @jacopaso Avanti, sorprenda anche quelli (e sconfessi anche le evidenze che emergono dagli studi del gruppo) di PAGES2K. Siamo tutti qui in trepidante attesa...😄 https://t.co/Xz40t5DJBV
@NigelStarr1 @CBeaugeant @AssoClimatoReal Malhonnête! 🤡 https://t.co/hoPKTy3zu4
@JohanKr75082502 @NotJimG @TonyClimate Neither were global events according to this research https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL
@Fred_On_X @PatrickSSte @AncientGarnet @ChrisMartzWX @Various93891835 Fred the Not-So-Great incorrectly asserts: "We know temps 2,250 to 1,600 years ago were roughly similar to today" No, we don't. You don't know what you are talking about. https://t.co/
@NigelStarr1 @CBeaugeant @AssoClimatoReal Les optimums climatique romain et médiéval n'étaient ni globaux ni synchronisés. C'est en cela qu'ils sont différents du réchauffement actuel. Neukom et al. 2019: No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold p
@NigelStarr1 @CBeaugeant @AssoClimatoReal En attendant, voici ce que donnent les reconstitutions via les proxys, plus précis que les vagues récits que vous prenez comme preuves absolues. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the pr
@NiusMarco @DawnTJ90 Wow it’s almost like you forgot that the LIA and Tambora-Yw/oAS didn’t happen or what forcing were behind it. Don’t worry. We remember. https://t.co/cek84xQIvM https://t.co/SmlSU3OVIe
@buckthegov @DawnTJ90 @7_Sages_Wotcm @NeuterTheDebt And that "global" Medieval Warm Period... not that global. Sorry though. It's not in a supermarket checkout line where you your have your Taylor Swift, News, Sports and some space for Science that peo
@Alex55246691 @Verbi06 @Culimero_ @Neruun @HolzheuStefan Gefühle? Sorry, "nur" Wissenschaft. Und ja, dies ist die globale Temperatur. Das MWP war lokal, s. https://t.co/Sj1WDVORRF Einfach was nicht zu "glauben", weil Sie es nicht wollen, ist nicht wissens
@JimSlaaen @MikeHudema Another misrepresentation which has been made completely irrelevant by subsequent research https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL https://t.co/3Z6BKvVZRT
@MichaelJones_33 @JamesGilbertWX The PAGES 2k Common Era global temperature reconstruction https://t.co/CPproeNd28 is a detailed one going back ~ 2000 years. https://t.co/uihan9MR07
@TrevorH53038397 @realrogerboyce The Roman period & MWP were regional, NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" -PAGES2K https://t.co/d
@RealCanuckLib @Jeppespip @TonyClimate Wrong localised events https://t.co/BXlAGyk3Is
@navigator087 @Jeppespip @TonyClimate Wrong they were localised events not planetary https://t.co/BXlAGyk3Is
@ChrisMartzWX @GeoDrill Not an excellent point because proxy data show that the MWP was NOT warmer than now. The *avg* temperature today is higher. Warming in the MWP affected just 40% of the globe while today's warming affects 98% of the globe. https://t.
@villainy_scum @ClimateDefiance Please identify any errors in these papers along with evidence that supports your assertion(s): https://t.co/PhXFATa1JG https://t.co/k09ySaCSq1 https://t.co/Oe7ZudlAua
@RobGoodall6 @JimBowersclimb @sjc_pbs Did you just try to use a custom Google Map to refute these papers? https://t.co/PhXFATa1JG https://t.co/k09ySaCSq1 https://t.co/Oe7ZudlAua
@somedeepstuff1 @dueyesterday @FChecker76 @JonMny Further data shows that the LIA wasn't global. https://t.co/nqtx9bcVFR
@RobertWager1 @JunkScience For example: https://t.co/sEfXKvx2K2)
@stephen1e4 @tinkertom2021 @Dooderoo @GeraldKutney @TonyClimate I read the scientific literature whenever I can. How many cli sci papers have you read? This is a good one. https://t.co/TkLokY4L67
@RobGoodall6 @JimBowersclimb @sjc_pbs Have you read these 3 papers? https://t.co/PhXFATa1JG https://t.co/k09ySaCSq1 https://t.co/Oe7ZudlAua
@JohnHookfox10 @rdlarter @oldbaldgit @guardian I’m sure he is. Are you? https://t.co/W9mfjaI5ef
@DR2_Driver @climatebrawl_ @Climatehope2 @ChrisMartzWX No, it's not "still within expected natural variability". The Roman period & MWP were regional, NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold per
@MichaelBordash @DanielRojnemark @newscientist Not global everywhere AT THE SAME TIME. https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@MichaelBordash @DanielRojnemark @newscientist MWP wasn't warm everywhere at the same time. A very important distinction I betting you don't understand https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
@DennyAdams1944 @curryja And in terms of research, it's been done. See this study from the lost respected peer reviewed journal on earth. https://t.co/WaFdXehYUl
RT @TWTThisIsNow: @MikeSniderEngr @theresphysics Loehle 2008 is not only deeply flawed (https://t.co/pXvwGxSw60) but it's now 16 years old.…
RT @TWTThisIsNow: @MikeSniderEngr @theresphysics Q: Why do "skeptics" still obsess over a quarter-century-old graph by Michael Mann, the ge…
@ute_lias @IsoHenkka @mariarautanen Monta kertaa sinulle @ute_lias on kerrottu, että mitään globaalia pientä jääkautta ei ole ollut olemassa. Miksi sinun on niin vaikeaa hyväksyä ja ymmärtää tämä? https://t.co/gWVbDb1bmx https://t.co/4p2u8SuHsJ
@MikeSniderEngr @theresphysics Loehle 2008 is not only deeply flawed (https://t.co/pXvwGxSw60) but it's now 16 years old. Science advances. The hockey stick I cited is far more recent - 2019. “No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over t
@MikeSniderEngr @theresphysics Q: Why do "skeptics" still obsess over a quarter-century-old graph by Michael Mann, the general results of which have been replicated dozens of times via multiple methods? A: Because they are #pseudoskeptics. Here's one of
@DanEtti @MartinSocle @climacritic @vicevongola2 Ciao. la fonte del mio grafico è questa. Sicuramente più affidabile di una singola carota in groenlandia https://t.co/EKxwzUhD2L
@Ross6040 @ProfBillMcGuire @MarcEHJones @DavidDibbell You’ve just been shown a global temperature reconstruction by PAGES2K that they weren’t. You would lose that bet.
@Ross6040 I've read the original article in NatSciReports. It refers to *regional* temperatures (the Mediterranean) not *global*. - https://t.co/fnYGbU6XOm - https://t.co/uGkl5uqqPA - https://t.co/YQMbpRA4am https://t.co/1t1ulY7GG1
@Ross6040 @ProfBillMcGuire The MWP was not global & probably even not that warm, e.g. - https://t.co/uGkl5uqqPA - https://t.co/YQMbpRA4am - https://t.co/fnYGbU6XOm https://t.co/1t1ulY7GG1
@Ross6040 @ProfBillMcGuire Your link is a blog post with a cut-and-paste plot that ends in 2000 discussing regional temperature. The MWP was not global & probably even not that warm, e.g. - https://t.co/uGkl5uqqPA - https://t.co/YQMbpRA4am - https://t
@Ross6040 Your link is a blog post from 2013. More recent science shows that MWP was not global & probably not that warm, e.g. - https://t.co/YQMbpRA4am - https://t.co/uGkl5uqqPA - https://t.co/fnYGbU6XOm https://t.co/1t1ulY7GG1
@Ross6040 @DavidDibbell @ProfBillMcGuire No, it wasn't. https://t.co/1t1ulY7GG1
@ObHerr @SteveRickettsSP @MedBennett @TonyClimate @nytimes Nope "No evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods over the preindustrial Common Era" https://t.co/sd4aAqljlL
@ProgressingCali @Ceist8 @JunkScience @MichaelEMann @MarkSteynOnline @washingtonpost @priscian Not globally warm everywhere at the same time https://t.co/qLBQ7lkT37
RT @Ceist8: @ProgressingCali @JunkScience @MichaelEMann @MarkSteynOnline @washingtonpost @priscian Bollocks ☝️ Contrary to what many AGW d…
@ProgressingCali @JunkScience @MichaelEMann @MarkSteynOnline @washingtonpost @priscian Bollocks ☝️ Contrary to what many AGW deniers claim, the Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than today. "No evidence for globall
@Andy_May_Writer The link is the following: https://t.co/rxstn2DS50.
RT @Ceist8: @dense_evi @MarcEHJones @BankersGallows @ProfMarkMaslin Correct. The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than…
RT @Ceist8: @dense_evi @MarcEHJones @BankersGallows @ProfMarkMaslin Correct. The Roman period & MWP were NOT global & were not warmer than…