False positive tests - problems and costs: https://t.co/LOQRbQvH18
@chris74bs Laut Lancet sind von 100 positiv Getesteten 4 falsch positiv. https://t.co/LQ8BOT7Msf
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
@Thomas_Wilckens @Thomas_Wilckens Another paper on #False_Positives Noch ein Papier https://t.co/rViXYvOPn3
@MattHancock @BorisJohnson @Ben_Everitt YOU STILL NOT LISTENING?
RT @reggaecrisp1: Even the RW, pro-Tory Lancet agrees; they’re lying to us. High test numbers help media push their lockdown agenda. They’…
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
READ IT GOR YOURSELVES - PCR IS A TOTAL FRAUD - THE LANCET - False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine https://t.co/F3xU2c85dr
@derrealist9 @Ceedtroid "...The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be somewhere between 0·8% and 4·0%.... Auf DE übertragen: 4% von 2500 positiven Test sind fehlerhaft. Also nur
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
Even the RW, pro-Tory Lancet agrees; they’re lying to us. High test numbers help media push their lockdown agenda. They’re crooks people; this is a RW Corporate American Coup.
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
RT @js100js100: LANCET AGREES MOST POSITIVES ARE FALSE "This rate could translate into a significant proportion of false-positive results d…
1/x #False_positive .. results: #hidden #problems & #costs Quote „..more and #more #asymptomatic individuals have undergone testing This #growing #inclusion of #asymptomatic people affects.. #pretest_probability, which #underpins #veracity of testin
RT @EdmundFordham: "The .. rate of operational false-positive .. tests in the UK ... could be .. between 0.8% and 4.0%." [2] from UK Govt d…
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/mPn8htMvQz
RT @Louise_katz: Published in The Lancet 'false-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in the current epidemiol…
RT @Louise_katz: Published in The Lancet 'false-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in the current epidemiol…
RT @Louise_katz: Published in The Lancet 'false-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in the current epidemiol…
Published in The Lancet 'false-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in the current epidemiological climate in the UK, with substantial consequences at the personal, health system, and societal levels' https://t.co/oamyoSxHQ4
RT @MarkReady47: @conscious2 @100Dianne @simondolan “The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; prelim…
RT @jsdorset: Protect your loved ones DON'T download the app! PCR test 80% + false positives. If you download the app, you may be imprisone…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @ArmenYuri: False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs @DurgaPrasannaM1 @OlenaZimba @GeorgievMD https://t.co/4KxQB87SdJ
@lac37j @brianlilley https://t.co/3OqBpj4fd3 false positive pcr in UK estimated between 0.8 and 4 percent. Not due to number of pcr cycles. Your turn
@ilsecoloxix Quanti sono infettivi? Perché i giornalisti non mettono finalmente in discussione i problemi evidenti del test PCR? Qui perfettamente riassunto in TheLancet, la rivista scientifica più rispettata al mondo. https://t.co/bD3y3IjdVD
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine #MAGA #KAG #COVID19 #Corona #covid19 #covid #pandemic #corona #coronavirus #epidemic #LSU #Louisiana https://t.co/MxNZN2mdIC
Interesting read in the @TheLancet yes it’s science https://t.co/LF5YvmmXOx
RT @NICU_doc_salone: There’s been a lot of media chatter about false +ve covid tests lately. Here’s an entry-level intro to the issue for t…
"With huge testing shortages & so many #falsepositives coming back, how do they know there's nearly 13,000 new #Coronavirus cases in UK today?" #Covid19 Latest https://t.co/nN8MeVJ8bG
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine https://t.co/SuluNvoCjv
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/SHAvdVChRv
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
@piersmorgan @BorisJohnson @MattHancock Try and read a little more and think if these numbers are accurate https://t.co/Oq7YtxOkXs
@piersmorgan Try and read a little more and think if these numbers are accurate https://t.co/Oq7YtxOkXs
@User0192846 @piersmorgan Try and read a little more and think if these numbers are accurate https://t.co/Oq7YtxOkXs
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
@piersmorgan With a false positive rate of 0.8 to 4%. https://t.co/tbPLhTLu8e
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/g6vh8wFFnE
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
RT @johnmaher0: @CanAditude We don't even know what our Covid tests mean or how many real cases we have, the Lancet says false positives c…
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine @DGSaude boa leitura @fcancio https://t.co/O6BjPH7dMT
@BreesAnna This article estimates the false positive rate is between 0.8% and 4% (of all tests conducted). Taking the middle (2.4%), and applying to tests so far in Scotland (789301) thats 18943. Of all +ve tests (30687) that's 62% are false +ve. https://
Zelfs @TheLancet twijfelt aan de #PCR testen. Logisch, de ontwikkelaar ervan heeft dat destijds duidelijk gemaakt
@surveilz @CTVNews Check this out, false positives are a very big number. epidemic may be mostly over https://t.co/hVvjkyOaMD https://t.co/Q8hZ9SLlwH
@CTVNews Testing may be sending the wrong information , false positives are very numerous the Lancet says - .8% to 4% of all tests - that is huge when you do 65k a day in Ontario alone https://t.co/hVvjkyOaMD https://t.co/cZxHDRJOSc
@ClarkeMicah This article estimates the false positive rate is between 0.8% and 4% (of all tests conducted). Taking the middle (2.4%), and applying to tests so far in Scotland (789301) thats 18943. Of all +ve tests (30687) that's 62% are false +ve. https:
@ThomasBeyer Some interesting info on testing, we are flying blind in Canada if this from the Lancet is remotely correct on the numbers .08% to 4% false positive https://t.co/hVvjkyOaMD https://t.co/3EjEuFLZcb
@punditclass Maybe you already have those antibodies or T cell immunity. Testing is proving itself useless due to false positives. RNA remnants can cause that, might mean widespread immunity/exposure. The numbers are worthless. From the Lancet. https:/
RT @MichaelBuerger8: "RT-PCR assays in the UK have analytical sensitivity and specificity of greater than 95%, but no single gold standard…
RT @NICU_doc_salone: There’s been a lot of media chatter about false +ve covid tests lately. Here’s an entry-level intro to the issue for t…
@CanAditude We don't even know what our Covid tests mean or how many real cases we have, the Lancet says false positives could be .08% to 4% of tests - were flying blind https://t.co/hVvjkyOaMD https://t.co/IoTwpwt7EJ
@jimiuorio Some interesting data from the Lancet, false positives may have gov'ts flying blind with policy. Case loads might be much lower or immunity much higher. https://t.co/hVvjkyOaMD https://t.co/yO4P1Q9gWA
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
@jamft Lots of false positives, can't believe the case count either according to the Lancet - at the lowest percent number it could be hundreds a day just in Ontario - this article is on the UK but could apply anywhere https://t.co/hVvjkyOaMD https://t.co/
@silasdenyer @WillowWyse Read this and the link in the references 2.Mayers C Baker K This is from The Lancet and corroborates everything @WillowWyse has stated. False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/azIBI7YvVe
For ZERO #COVID-19 cases STOP TESTING The death rate percentage relative to population is all that matters the rest is #propaganda World #deaths from COVID-19 is 0.0125% over 80% of people have minimal #symptoms Is the muzzle and devastation of rules worth
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
@sunlorrie Lancet reporting false positives between .08% and 4%, a huge problem for public policy makers - what is real today? Speaks to low death rates ! https://t.co/hVvjkywzV5 https://t.co/vGFIOug9K6
@MysDiggi I found other sources I’d rather read and watch like these ones https://t.co/tyE4oOALed
@OceanadeSilva
@outersite
@charliebilello Consider false positives now, the Lancet indicates a rate of .08% and 4%. Part of that is RNA from previous infections. It could be a huge issue being overlooked, public policy is an issue when based on false positives. https://t.co/hVvjky
RT @NICU_doc_salone: There’s been a lot of media chatter about false +ve covid tests lately. Here’s an entry-level intro to the issue for t…
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
There’s been a lot of media chatter about false +ve covid tests lately. Here’s an entry-level intro to the issue for those who’d like to know more and are not familiar with the test. Also describes some mitigation strategies, all of which are used widely.
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
Trumps weird drug cocktail sounds totally bizarre. Whisked away to be treated in private. https://t.co/MzoDS7ZesL
@timobobby1 @sunasaji また議論していらっしゃったんですね。 参考までに、9/29のランセットの記事です。「COVID-19の偽陽性:隠れた問題点とコスト」 先日のBMJの記事といい、最近このような論調の記事が増えてきた気がしますね。https://t.co/eUnU9QCefq
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…