RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
@Morris8Roz Because it is proven that RT-PCR tests: 1. Cannot test positive for any other virus, inc any other corona virus 2. Please read the Lancet. Whilst they say .3 - 4% they do accept it may be higher. https://t.co/CfN37aANRf.
RT @motogpbsb: @pdebdon @iancollinsuk More data for you Peter👍https://t.co/27VhZ1IJFd
RT @BangoBilly: @Madz_Grant THE LANCET PCR swab tests in the real world might differ substantially from analytical sensitivity and specific…
"False-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in the current epidemiological climate in the UK…pretest probability assessments should be considered, and clear evidence-based guidelines on interpretation of test results developed"
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: False-positive #COVID19 results: hidden problems and costs #pandemic #coronavirus https://t.co/3NZCFxgHxz @TheLancet…
False-positive #COVID19 results: hidden problems and costs #pandemic #coronavirus https://t.co/3NZCFxgHxz @TheLancet https://t.co/G71L4pQ8l0
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: @zeitonline 3/3 Wenn wir weiter Zulassen, dass Entscheidungen wissenschaftlich NICHT fundiert getroffen werden, risiki…
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: @zeitonline 3/3 Wenn wir weiter Zulassen, dass Entscheidungen wissenschaftlich NICHT fundiert getroffen werden, risiki…
RT @felicityhuston: False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine . If only @MattHancock…
RT @felicityhuston: False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine . If only @MattHancock…
Ja, wir verstehen es. Und wer es heute noch nicht verstanden hat, wird es morgen vielleicht.. wir geben nicht auf.
@zeitonline 3/3 Wenn wir weiter Zulassen, dass Entscheidungen wissenschaftlich NICHT fundiert getroffen werden, risikieren wir nicht nur unsere Wirtschaft, sondern auch den (sozialen) Frieden, wenn die Menschen verstehen was gerade passiert https://t.co/jg
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
https://t.co/Zb9CxXjgiS Here is a recent article from the Lancet medical journal who consider the PCR false positive to be between 0.80 and 4%. Whilst that doesn't sound much.. when you try to detect low frequency positive cases, usually around 1 in 100 yo
@hearmenow86 @MargaretFerrier https://t.co/Zb9CxXjgiS Here is a recent article from the Lancet medical journal who consider the false positive to be between 0.80 and 4%. Whilst that doesn't sound much.. when you trying to detect low frequency positive case
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
@FrankfurtZack The problem is known, but #drosten get's the Bundesverdienstkreuz for ignoring it - politics continues to violate #civilrights with #quarantaine and was taxpayors money https://t.co/jgo9vexswF
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @SorenSchifter: Bedre sent end aldrig. WHOs talerør, The Lancet, gør nu også opmærksom på problemet med falsk positive PCR-tests. I Danm…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @TreyGraves2: @rumpfshaker And if you’ve been paying attention to covid tests (we do as many in 2 days as all flu season), you would kno…
[COVID-19 PCR testing issue] @LancetRespirMed September 29, 2020 False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/rpuyYZWGoW
RT @LancetRespirMed: NEW Comment—False-positive #COVID19 results: hidden problems and costs From E Surkova & colleagues https://t.co/rReQa…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @MarkReady47: @MichaelYeadon3 “The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates sho…
Can the cost be a US election? https://t.co/f0JW6ALWGh
RT @BangoBilly: @Madz_Grant THE LANCET PCR swab tests in the real world might differ substantially from analytical sensitivity and specific…
@pdebdon @iancollinsuk More data for you Peter👍https://t.co/27VhZ1IJFd
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
@ClarkeMicah @rickyb Have you seen this Peter? https://t.co/27VhZ1IJFd
RT @MarkReady47: @ClareCraigPath “The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates sho…
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/CN250v6tAW
https://t.co/obGQZK9aDC @erstmal_denken @c_drosten @hendrikstreeck @Baloo24 @KoheletDPS @ChanasitJonas @FrankfurtZack @jensspahn Wenn sogar das Lancet von 0,8 bis 4,0 falsch positiven Tests ausgeht.... @Karl_Lauterbach
@JuliaHB1 please please read this and share ,this is incredible.... https://t.co/ycy1gqHQ7N
@uksciencechief I'd appreciate your thoughts on this?? https://t.co/ycy1gqHQ7N
RT @BangoBilly: @Madz_Grant THE LANCET PCR swab tests in the real world might differ substantially from analytical sensitivity and specific…
@IndependentSage Estimates of the PCR FPR between 0.8% and 4% in the UK. Other countries are no longer using this test as the main driver for confirming cases! Do you agree with them, if not why not ! https://t.co/BBZ76lNLgO
RT @HpcJohn: @YPopulist @BreesAnna https://t.co/ykPaNaMVqv Somewhere between 0.4% and 4% I will trust The Lancet thankyou.
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/mdQKtTNUUx
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @LaurenceBettle: Lancet: false-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in current U.K. epidemiological conditio…
RT @HpcJohn: @YPopulist @BreesAnna https://t.co/ykPaNaMVqv Somewhere between 0.4% and 4% I will trust The Lancet thankyou.
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/G66dR5h7zw article non rétracté.. :)
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
@YPopulist @BreesAnna https://t.co/ykPaNaMVqv Somewhere between 0.4% and 4% I will trust The Lancet thankyou.
RT @LaurenceBettle: Lancet: false-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in current U.K. epidemiological conditio…
And then this doozy. https://t.co/HKhiyAc42W
@StevePozgaj @tonysrizz09 @TalbertSwan @realDonaldTrump I dont...and I'm not. Then there's this... False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine https://t.co/aT4T0PzuUj
@tonysrizz09 @StevePozgaj @TalbertSwan @realDonaldTrump They all in on it. False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine https://t.co/aT4T0PR6iT
@Austen Given that the tests are way too sensitive, yea
@rumpfshaker And if you’ve been paying attention to covid tests (we do as many in 2 days as all flu season), you would know these tests are way too sensitive. Who knows whether FL/POTUS really have it currently or not. 🤷♂️
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/G8ME9uj0cz
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @andrewbostom: 1/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: “no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equat…
RT @LaurenceBettle: Lancet: false-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in current U.K. epidemiological conditio…
@MoKusanagi @TheRealHoarse More info here on false positives that the UK is experiencing, and their test is 95% accuracy (vs 70% test my med neighbor took) https://t.co/NOS1BPOZNA
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine https://t.co/7G0tbBdvOG
RT @SorenSchifter: Bedre sent end aldrig. WHOs talerør, The Lancet, gør nu også opmærksom på problemet med falsk positive PCR-tests. I Danm…
LANCET features article about false positives with some swab tests and the negative consequences of false positives -- such as loss of income and psychological damage: https://t.co/ZcV4XA6glJ
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @LaurenceBettle: Lancet: false-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in current U.K. epidemiological conditio…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/kKFf0KU7t6
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
@Michael56986218 @FrankfurtZack @jot_witte @c_drosten Was lesen wir denn in "The Lancet" aktuell zum Thema? Wäre halt auch wichtig mal vom Schreibtisch und der bloßen Theorie weg zu kommen und anzuerkennen, dass es in der Praxis und der Realität doch ein k
@beerockxs @KlarKarl1 grafik dazu. fehlerquote zw. 0,8-4,0%, je nachdem. exhibit a: https://t.co/CTeEqgvQKT exhibit b: https://t.co/Mb3V4rhKsC https://t.co/6JkxP0nxqy
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…