RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
@MattHancock @BorisJohnson @CMO_England @Afzal4Gorton
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
@MattHancock @DJWarburton for info. Would you like to comment. @CMO_England @uksciencechief
That further reinforces my beliefs .
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @foogatwo: More data around false positives. This time in the Lancet. For the record, I use 99.2 specificity in my work, which is the lo…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @BangoBilly: THE LANCET PCR swab tests in the real world might differ substantially from analytical sensitivity and specificity. The con…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @EWoodhouse7: Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to de…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @andrewbostom: 1/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: “no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equat…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @EWoodhouse7: Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to de…
RT @EWoodhouse7: Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to de…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @EWoodhouse7: Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to de…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
This tweet steam is essential in understanding the importance of GOOD testing practices and why moving away from high CT positives are hurting the US and degrading trust on our governing bodies!! @sullivanradio
@DarrenPlymouth Seen this Darren? https://t.co/27VhZ1IJFd
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
@JuliaHB1 This could be very important? https://t.co/27VhZ1IJFd
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @foogatwo: More data around false positives. This time in the Lancet. For the record, I use 99.2 specificity in my work, which is the lo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @EWoodhouse7: Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to de…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @EWoodhouse7: Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to de…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @andrewbostom: 2/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: Individual & Societal Consequences https://t.co/hf067UWxZy https://t.co/HsN…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @andrewbostom: 1/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: “no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equat…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
Highly respected medical journal The Lancet highlighting the amount of false positive Covid19 results in the UK. https://t.co/OYW4uOoATX
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @andrewbostom: 1/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: “no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equat…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @andrewbostom: 1/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: “no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equat…
RT @EWoodhouse7: Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to de…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
Show me the culture! 👇🏼
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @andrewbostom: 1/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: “no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equat…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @EWoodhouse7: Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to de…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @andrewbostom: 1/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: “no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equat…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @andrewbostom: 1/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: “no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equat…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @EWoodhouse7: Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to de…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @EWoodhouse7: Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to de…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to determine the 2,000+ positive tests. You're not asking for individual health info - but rather a graph or chart of the ct level distribu
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @andrewbostom: 1/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: “no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equat…
RT @kerpen: If DC's false positives are in this range then nearly all to all of DC's positives are false positives. https://t.co/cHge5VA4E0
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/1yWc5ovqFD https://t.co/zpxU67diyu
Black Mirror update
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
@WelshGovernment Yu are at risk from a false positive PCR - https://t.co/j180Rlywcw