RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
RT @ivan_janssens: En nog steeds weigert @vrtnws over de PCR-test de waarheid te vertellen. Als volleerd propagandazender proberen ze dan m…
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
@HLN_BE Hoeveel daarvan zijn “False Positives” vrees dat dat aantal ergens tussen de 50% en 90% ligt. https://t.co/Ih6BI6RUNi
RT @ymori117: The Lancet Respiratory Medicine「偽陽性のCOVID-19検査結果:隠れた問題とコスト」 https://t.co/3SkbHRRem6
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine「偽陽性のCOVID-19検査結果:隠れた問題とコスト」 https://t.co/3SkbHRRem6
RT @ivan_janssens: En nog steeds weigert @vrtnws over de PCR-test de waarheid te vertellen. Als volleerd propagandazender proberen ze dan m…
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
En nog steeds weigert @vrtnws over de PCR-test de waarheid te vertellen. Als volleerd propagandazender proberen ze dan maar 500 dokters en 1800 medische professionals zwart te maken door ze te linken aan "complotdenkers". Walgelijke omroep.
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
RT @_InThisTogether: We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in…
We does this means for claimed #COVID19 "cases"? If the false +ve rate is as low as 0.8%, for ALL tests, but only 1 in a 200 test positive, that means for every 5 people who test +ve (Pillar 2) at least 4 will be false +ve's. We are being deceived. https:
@LindaMargDean @NHSCOVID19app Bit of reading... https://t.co/k6mhlt7UU3
RT @MarkReady47: @PFoster68 @CllrBSilvester @DominicRaab “The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; p…
RT @MarkReady47: @PFoster68 @CllrBSilvester @DominicRaab “The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; p…
Protect your loved ones DON'T download the app! PCR test 80% + false positives. If you download the app, you may be imprisoned in your own home or face a fine, because you got a false positive result. Lancet study on false positive PCR test https://t.co/s
RT @MarkReady47: @PFoster68 @CllrBSilvester @DominicRaab “The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; p…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
Lesenswert 👇🏻
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @ArmenYuri: False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs @DurgaPrasannaM1 @OlenaZimba @GeorgievMD https://t.co/4KxQB87SdJ
RT @jsdorset: Who the actual F*** do you think you are @MattHancock Mr Dhesi was pointing out YOUR failings & lies It was not divisive lang…
@ardenthistorian @Tagesspiegel Bei uns bekommt derjenige, welcher die Diskussion im die Problematik des PCR Tests und der sinnlosen Geldverschwendung incl. illegaler Konsequenzen verweigert das Bundesverdienstkreuz #Drosten #Covid19 #test https://t.co/Im9
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
Bayes' Theorem reminder : https://t.co/EzTeRhAfqL #health #publichealth #COVID
Did you see this Fionna @fascinatorfun? I wonder if this goes some way to explain the divergence between the case trajectory & the mortality trajectory? https://t.co/wIOrTX49rZ
@ASampierdarena @GiovanniToti Quello che ha detto nel 2014 sui test PCR è vero anche oggi. Vedi #meinschiff6 o #NHL. Lui stesso chiede di nuovo un cambiamento nella strategia di prova. The Lancet: https://t.co/bD3y3IjdVD
@i1xy_ @webdevMason Not foolproof, but false positive rate is thought to be quite a lot lower than false negative AFAICT https://t.co/JxGUj2TRRR
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
@Kalle75291704 @rki_de @BMG_Bund Im Fachmagazin "The Lancet", aktuell ein Beitrag zur "operativen Rate" falsch positiver PCR-Test. "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be somew
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @LutherB99406283: New paper from the Lancet on false-positive swab tests in UK. "estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and…
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: The plot thinkens Testing general asymptomatic population not scientifically supported waste Consequences like #quaran…
@hyprnormalisatn @globalnews @jpazzano Fix what? A test with 1-4% false positive? Most due to human error and contaminated supplies? https://t.co/kdIy1C4bE5 https://t.co/vQyDZhGbTf
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
Selon récent article dans le Lancet (https://t.co/OFgpQU83h4), le taux estimé de faux positifs #COVID19 serait de 0,8 à 4%. Donc un taux total de positifs détectés est de 5% comme en #BZH, la mesure n'est pas significative. Autrement dit le processus n'est
@NicholasWind I'm sorry, what? https://t.co/kdIy1C4bE5 Most false positives have to do with human error and contaminated testing materials https://t.co/nUhWQFNqWe
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @Ianwatling3: False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine @MISSXBUTTERFLYX https://t…
RT @RalfHrmann: Falsch positive COVID-19-Ergebnisse: versteckte Probleme und Kosten https://t.co/AU4nxbtBTj
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine @MISSXBUTTERFLYX https://t.co/UbtjgMFgU2
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
Falsch positive COVID-19-Ergebnisse: versteckte Probleme und Kosten https://t.co/AU4nxbtBTj
@CllrBSilvester Where do you get this data? False positives are a max of 33% https://t.co/9Lr2E9Yt84 quote your source
@N68Winstan It's not a conspiracy, even Matt Hancock accepts it as being 0.8%, the Lancet paper below claims it to be between 0.8% and 4%, referencing a paper by Carl Mayers & Kate Baker, 3rd June 2020. The formula for false positives is here https://t
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
The plot thinkens Testing general asymptomatic population not scientifically supported waste Consequences like #quarantine may be illigal https://t.co/Im9n9v9XGq one might be positive for weeks after symptoms https://t.co/79Ivx5ui9F https://t.co/4Ydyp9WT4L
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
"one systematic review reported false-negative rates of between 2% and 33% in repeat sample testing" "False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs" https://t.co/HdQNrxqMky
RT @JamesAThurber: RT-PCR tests are the crap gold standard for detecting Covid-19 in the community the result of which has a knock-on adver…
RT-PCR tests are the crap gold standard for detecting Covid-19 in the community the result of which has a knock-on adversarial effect. https://t.co/EowH71EYbs https://t.co/qTKWxmZCGB
RT @ArmenYuri: False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs @DurgaPrasannaM1 @OlenaZimba @GeorgievMD https://t.co/4KxQB87SdJ
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs @DurgaPrasannaM1 @OlenaZimba @GeorgievMD https://t.co/4KxQB87SdJ
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: False-positive #COVID19 results: hidden problems and costs #pandemic #coronavirus https://t.co/3NZCFxgHxz @TheLancet…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
'The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be somewhere between 0·8% and 4·0%' https://t.co/6PEKQSTUQY
@LaurenM0ss @ONS Jeeze! You really have no idea of what the organisation you are working for is all about, do you? https://t.co/3ueS4Uhetw
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
@hsenki "Globally, most effort so far has been invested in turnaround times and low test sensitivity (ie, false negatives); one systematic review reported false-negative rates of between 2% and 33% in repeat sample testing." https://t.co/FjgE3goYEc
RT @motogpbsb: @AdeleBull4 @nicolawitch From The Lancet, no less. https://t.co/27VhZ1IJFd
RT @motogpbsb: @AdeleBull4 @nicolawitch From The Lancet, no less. https://t.co/27VhZ1IJFd
@AdeleBull4 @nicolawitch From The Lancet, no less. https://t.co/27VhZ1IJFd
A few days ago The Lancet stated a probable false postive rate for Covid-19 of up to 4% so we can’t be 100% sure. https://t.co/f0JW6ALWGh
dopad falešných pozitivních testů https://t.co/aVaKSW9jmm
@sarahmanavis @NewStatesman There are well known problems with false positive PCR tests. Lancet put it between 0.8% and 4% in the UK. The fact that you don't know that shows that you don't know what you are talking about, not that they don't. You don't def
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @MarkReady47: @CllrBSilvester “The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates sho…
@TorstenGellrich @SStoll13 The Lancet: "operationale" falsch-positive Corona-PCR-Tests im Bereich von 0,8 - 4,0% https://t.co/7U8UfVCXjo
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @LaurenceBettle: Lancet: false-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in current U.K. epidemiological conditio…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
Who the actual F*** do you think you are @MattHancock Mr Dhesi was pointing out YOUR failings & lies It was not divisive language you shyster look at this lancet study on the PCR test its a huge fail https://t.co/syXRTUXiw2 I abhor Labour but I stand w