RT @wesbury: Lancet: “To summarise, false-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in the current epidemiological c…
RT @wesbury: Lancet: “To summarise, false-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in the current epidemiological c…
RT @LutherB99406283: New paper from the Lancet on false-positive swab tests in UK. "estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and…
Lancet: “To summarise, false-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in the current epidemiological climate in the UK, with substantial consequences at the personal, health system, and societal levels.” https://t.co/ENJt1dPbbk
RT @LutherB99406283: New paper from the Lancet on false-positive swab tests in UK. "estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and…
RT @LutherB99406283: New paper from the Lancet on false-positive swab tests in UK. "estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and…
RT @LutherB99406283: New paper from the Lancet on false-positive swab tests in UK. "estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and…
RT @LutherB99406283: New paper from the Lancet on false-positive swab tests in UK. "estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and…
RT @LutherB99406283: New paper from the Lancet on false-positive swab tests in UK. "estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and…
RT @LutherB99406283: New paper from the Lancet on false-positive swab tests in UK. "estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and…
RT @LutherB99406283: New paper from the Lancet on false-positive swab tests in UK. "estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and…
RT @LutherB99406283: New paper from the Lancet on false-positive swab tests in UK. "estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and…
RT @LutherB99406283: New paper from the Lancet on false-positive swab tests in UK. "estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and…
RT @LutherB99406283: New paper from the Lancet on false-positive swab tests in UK. "estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and…
RT @LutherB99406283: New paper from the Lancet on false-positive swab tests in UK. "estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and…
RT @LutherB99406283: New paper from the Lancet on false-positive swab tests in UK. "estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and…
RT @MConceptions: @DazzyNicks @timjames16 @Stuffysays @BhamUpdates Darren, I have recently looked more at false positives rather than asymp…
@MoreeSpinne @nomask_citizen @A_J_Alana @Charlotte3003G @MichaelYeadon3 I prefer the Lancet https://t.co/CfN37aANRf.
RT @MConceptions: @BhamUpdates Consequences of false positives from The Lancet. https://t.co/wqLCQHMSVd
@TheLancet has published on the risk of false positives and the importance of quality control to minimise the risk.
@WarriorBrexit @colesdav @Uptotherewithit Read this... https://t.co/Ng9b0ClsVc
RT @LancetRespirMed: NEW Comment—False-positive #COVID19 results: hidden problems and costs From E Surkova & colleagues https://t.co/rReQa…
False-positive #COVID19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/SK4wDiYdkz
RT @rahah_ghazali: False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine https://t.co/KjeLjapzRc
RT @queensusieq: @ianbrown Also the false positives Ian! 4000 out of 7000 false positives https://t.co/423OzBswNz
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine https://t.co/KjeLjapzRc
👀 @Vico0310
RT @LancetRespirMed: NEW Comment—False-positive #COVID19 results: hidden problems and costs From E Surkova & colleagues https://t.co/rReQa…
RT @LancetRespirMed: NEW Comment—False-positive #COVID19 results: hidden problems and costs From E Surkova & colleagues https://t.co/rReQa…
RT @zorogat: https://t.co/mG5jvvPoJd "false-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in the current epidemiological…
@profkarolsikora New Report in the Lancet about the failings and FPR of pillar 2 tests
@SarahKHolford @bubblygum1983 @noelphobic @space22117146 @GaryMLFC1980 @clintt151 This may be useful: estimated false positives are between 0.8% - 4% https://t.co/4WF6KLN285
@ianbrown Also the false positives Ian! 4000 out of 7000 false positives https://t.co/423OzBswNz
@WybrenvanHaga Dit is een bubbelbereide perfide verdraaiing door een theoretisch probleem (aanwezigheid RNA<>ziekte) en real world selectiever gebruik door elkaar te gooien. Verspreidt zulke desinformatie niet aub https://t.co/uhnA7Epvfu
Noticias de Lancet https://t.co/SNidvMAU1L
RT @LancetRespirMed: NEW Comment—False-positive #COVID19 results: hidden problems and costs From E Surkova & colleagues https://t.co/rReQa…
NEW Comment—False-positive #COVID19 results: hidden problems and costs From E Surkova & colleagues https://t.co/rReQaLyeu3 https://t.co/tQm8XfPDmq