@reitschuster - Bitte Familien zukommen lassen, deren Kinder damit bedroht werden vom Gesundheitsamt @c_drosten - Nicht mehr so erwünscht, was? @jensspahn @Karl_Lauterbach @realDonaldTrump @QuakDr @OliverJanich @maxotte_says
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
“no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equates with infectivity unless infectious virus particles have been confirmed with laboratory culture-based methods.” False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https:/
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
@PanData19 I was hoping someone could help me confirm whether I understand correctly that this Lancet paper corroborates the story that up to 90% of the Pillar 2 tests in the UK are false positives? Published 29 September: https://t.co/YBN1of1jQi
FAO @MattHancock @CMO_England @BorisJohnson any chance of a balanced approach?
Think about that when they hammer you daily about cases. The PCR Ct needs to be revisited. @VeraEtches @fordnation @celliottability @brianlilley
Kanskje @erna_solberg og @BentHHoyre kan lese litt om falske positive PCR prøveresultater og åpne opp landet. Kun et fåtall er ekte positive, hvis noen. Den største skandalen i moderne historie https://t.co/IyDB2yT3Th
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @foogatwo: More data around false positives. This time in the Lancet. For the record, I use 99.2 specificity in my work, which is the lo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine https://t.co/JiWyRTjZMT
" Faux Positifs " False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs @ #TheLancet |" RT - PCR " #report #Testing #asymptomatic #LockDown #COVID_19 #CORONA_VIRUS #SRAS_CoV_2 #SARS #épidémic #pandémic #Health https://t.co/YY97noStkZ
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @BangoBilly: THE LANCET PCR swab tests in the real world might differ substantially from analytical sensitivity and specificity. The con…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @andrewbostom: 1/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: “no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equat…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
Wir sind noch unter 2 % - gähn
@Karl_Lauterbach Falsch positive Tests? https://t.co/Oag8qIddoP
@jensspahn @DuezenTekkal Falsch positive Tests? https://t.co/Oag8qIddoP
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
@TheLancet Even The Lancet can be unclear: “than 3000 per day at the peak of the first wave, to just more than 100 in August..”. Does this mean 100/day in August or 100/day each day of August. Thx https://t.co/GpuT95ekwe
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
@piersmorgan https://t.co/mpgvsyE2kq If this is true it could mean ALL positive PCR tests are FALSE POSITIVES. Is the Lancet a Covidiot too ?
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine https://t.co/JfvgeU6Jgh
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @EWoodhouse7: Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to de…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @EWoodhouse7: Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to de…
RT @andrewbostom: 1/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: “no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equat…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
@SeanOSeIrlLtd @FatEmperor @fordnation @CanadianPM @JustinTrudeau @JimWatsonOttawa @Eli_ElChantiry @dockaurG Canada is about 75000 tests/day. False Positives 0.8%-4% give 600 - 3000 positive cases which are false positive. Canada reported 1600 positive.
@JuliaHB1 I'm surprised this hasn't received more publicity.... https://t.co/70ywCGorCx
Shall we talk about the false positives? 🤔 No? Just shut the country down anyway shall we? https://t.co/jU1yxjPglq
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @andrewbostom: 1/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: “no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equat…
RT @BangoBilly: THE LANCET PCR swab tests in the real world might differ substantially from analytical sensitivity and specificity. The con…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @EWoodhouse7: Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to de…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
@BethRigby @bbclaurak @Peston @jonsnowC4 Can you please get an understanding of this data and challenge @BorisJohnson @MattHancock @uksciencechief @CMO_England on it. The positive case numbers are NOT what is being reported. If only one of you from the M
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine https://t.co/I9ANrGS7Sk
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @andrewbostom: 1/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: “no data suggests that detection of low levels of viral RNA by RT-PCR equat…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @EWoodhouse7: Parents of @illinois_alma students - please call or email the medical center director and request the ct levels used to de…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @SabinaWalker18: False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/GZLEAepCqO
RT @MarkReady47: @MichaelYeadon3 “The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates sho…
RT @theotherphilipp: Auch das Fachmagazin The Lancet hat keine Zweifel an "operationalen" falsch-positiven #Corona #PCR-Tests im Bereich vo…
RT @andrewbostom: 2/ Lancet Oped on false-positive C19 results: Individual & Societal Consequences https://t.co/hf067UWxZy https://t.co/HsN…
RT @motogpbsb: @DarrenPlymouth Seen this Darren? https://t.co/27VhZ1IJFd
RT @SabinaWalker18: False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/GZLEAepCqO
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs https://t.co/GZLEAepCqO
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @venivici27: The Lancet 👉Estimates of current false positives: Between 0·8 - 4·0%. This could translate into significant proportion of d…
RT @MarkReady47: @MichaelYeadon3 “The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates sho…