False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine https://t.co/VROHeLTNe1
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: Même le Lancet commence à avoir des doutes sur les tests...On fait plus complotiste, non ? https://t.co/04LP37xPtZ
Excellent editorial highlighting challenges of interpreting tests now our strategy has moved from targeted (high pretest probability) to community (low pretest probability). https://t.co/PJNPA8nBRt
@pjvanerp "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be somewhere between 0.8% and 4.0%" https://t.co/K6alviGnNv
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
@BioTurboNick Thoughts? https://t.co/yoTYAjC5sc
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
RT @moon_bio: #Atchoummatuer La contamination lors de l’échantillonnage, la contamination par des amplicons ou des réactifs, la contaminati…
@DiederikJekel @ionicasmeets Zolang in het publieke debat positieve testen stelselmatig 1-op-1 vertaald worden met besmettingen kan het niet vaak genoeg herhaald worden. Is belangrijk, zie ook: https://t.co/K6alviGnNv
RT @moon_bio: Même le Lancet commence à avoir des doutes sur les tests...On fait plus complotiste, non ? https://t.co/04LP37xPtZ
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @moon_bio: Même le Lancet commence à avoir des doutes sur les tests...On fait plus complotiste, non ? https://t.co/04LP37xPtZ
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @puffnblow_at_GP: Why aren't MSM reporting on this Lancet study @BBCNews @itvnews @SkyNews @LBCNews @talkRADIO Why are @10DowningStreet…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
😷 False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs - The Lancet 👉 https://t.co/5be2tW53G4 💊 #Medical #GroupZirigoza
false positive PCR tests...
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @foogatwo: More data around false positives. This time in the Lancet. For the record, I use 99.2 specificity in my work, which is the lo…
RT @puffnblow_at_GP: Why aren't MSM reporting on this Lancet study @BBCNews @itvnews @SkyNews @LBCNews @talkRADIO Why are @10DowningStreet…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @foogatwo: More data around false positives. This time in the Lancet. For the record, I use 99.2 specificity in my work, which is the lo…
False positives? What could go wrong.
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @foogatwo: More data around false positives. This time in the Lancet. For the record, I use 99.2 specificity in my work, which is the lo…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
What does this mean? That a large swath of cases reported daily could be false positives. We’re talking significant amounts. 50%! https://t.co/HKhiyAc42W #orpol #orleg @orgop @OHAOregon @OregonGovBrown
RT @wesbury: Lancet: “To summarise, false-positive COVID-19 swab test results might be increasingly likely in the current epidemiological c…
@TheEliKlein Did you see this study? NYC could be nearly all operational false positives at this point https://t.co/q7GBlTAMin
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @puffnblow_at_GP: Why aren't MSM reporting on this Lancet study @BBCNews @itvnews @SkyNews @LBCNews @talkRADIO Why are @10DowningStreet…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @foogatwo: More data around false positives. This time in the Lancet. For the record, I use 99.2 specificity in my work, which is the lo…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @foogatwo: More data around false positives. This time in the Lancet. For the record, I use 99.2 specificity in my work, which is the lo…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @foogatwo: More data around false positives. This time in the Lancet. For the record, I use 99.2 specificity in my work, which is the lo…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
More data around false positives. This time in the Lancet. For the record, I use 99.2 specificity in my work, which is the lowest range given by this piece. That puts NJs false positive rate at around 50% of all cases.
If you’re wondering how this epidemic will last until the end of 2021 as experts tell us it will, here’s how
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @EthicalSkeptic: Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
Excellent. I am using 1.55% right now. I am glad they recognized what I call 'program false-positives' and not testing tolerance false positives... operational false-positives is as good a name as any. 👍
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…
RT @kerpen: LANCET: "The current rate of operational false-positive swab tests in the UK is unknown; preliminary estimates show it could be…