↓ Skip to main content

Modern Proteomics – Sample Preparation, Analysis and Practical Applications

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Modern Proteomics – Sample Preparation, Analysis and Practical Applications'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Proteomes, Their Compositions and Their Sources
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Protein Fractionation and Enrichment Prior to Proteomics Sample Preparation
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics; from Proteomes to Peptides
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Plant Structure and Specificity – Challenges and Sample Preparation Considerations for Proteomics
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Improving Proteome Coverage by Reducing Sample Complexity via Chromatography
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Database Search Engines: Paradigms, Challenges and Solutions
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Mass Analyzers and Mass Spectrometers
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Top-Down Mass Spectrometry: Proteomics to Proteoforms
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Platforms and Pipelines for Proteomics Data Analysis and Management
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Tandem Mass Spectrum Sequencing: An Alternative to Database Search Engines in Shotgun Proteomics
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Visualization, Inspection and Interpretation of Shotgun Proteomics Identification Results
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Protein Inference
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Modification Site Localization in Peptides
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Useful Web Resources
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Quantification
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Bioinformatics Tools for Proteomics Data Interpretation
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Identification, Quantification, and Site Localization of Protein Posttranslational Modifications via Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Protein-Protein Interaction Detection Via Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Protein Structural Analysis via Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Introduction to Clinical Proteomics
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Discovery of Candidate Biomarkers
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Statistical Approaches to Candidate Biomarker Panel Selection
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Qualification and Verification of Protein Biomarker Candidates
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Protocol for Standardizing High-to-Moderate Abundance Protein Biomarker Assessments Through an MRM-with-Standard-Peptides Quantitative Approach
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modern Proteomics – Sample Preparation, Analysis and Practical Applications
Published by
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-41448-5
ISBNs
978-3-31-941446-1, 978-3-31-941448-5
Editors

Hamid Mirzaei, Martin Carrasco

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 222 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 25%
Student > Master 46 20%
Researcher 36 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 25 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 81 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 17%
Chemistry 22 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 35 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,491,603
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#184
of 5,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,238
of 396,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#31
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.