↓ Skip to main content

Skeletal Muscle Development

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Skeletal Muscle Development'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Bisulfite Sequencing for DNA Methylation Analysis of Primary Muscle Stem Cells
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Whole Genome Chromatin IP-Sequencing (ChIP-Seq) in Skeletal Muscle Cells
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Analysis of RNA Expression in Adult Zebrafish Skeletal Muscle
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Targeted Lipidomic Analysis of Myoblasts by GC-MS and LC-MS/MS
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Measuring Mitochondrial Substrate Utilization in Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Microcontact-Printed Hydrogel Microwell Arrays for Clonal Muscle Stem Cell Cultures
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Isolation, Culture, and Differentiation of Fibro/Adipogenic Progenitors (FAPs) from Skeletal Muscle
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Human Satellite Cell Isolation and Xenotransplantation
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Application of Split-GFP Reassembly Assay to Study Myogenesis and Myofusion In Vitro
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Myogenic Maturation by Optical-Training in Cultured Skeletal Muscle Cells
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Fabrication of Micromolded Gelatin Hydrogels for Long-Term Culture of Aligned Skeletal Myotubes
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Quantification of Embryonic Myofiber Development by Immunofluorescence
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 How to Wire the Diaphragm: Wholemount Staining Methods to Analyze Mammalian Respiratory Innervation
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Membrane Repair Assay for Human Skeletal Muscle Cells
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Cryoinjury Model for Tissue Injury and Repair in Bioengineered Human Striated Muscle
Attention for Chapter 6: Microcontact-Printed Hydrogel Microwell Arrays for Clonal Muscle Stem Cell Cultures
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Microcontact-Printed Hydrogel Microwell Arrays for Clonal Muscle Stem Cell Cultures
Chapter number 6
Book title
Skeletal Muscle Development
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7283-8_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7282-1, 978-1-4939-7283-8
Authors

Aguilar, Victor M., Cosgrove, Benjamin D., Victor M. Aguilar, Benjamin D. Cosgrove

Abstract

Adult muscle stem cells (also called satellite cells) are an anatomically defined population of cells that are essential for muscle regeneration. In aging and dystrophic diseases, muscle stem cells (MuSCs) exhibit functional and molecular heterogeneity; therefore, single-cell assay technologies are critical to illuminate the mechanisms of pathological stem cell dysfunction. Here, we describe the process of generating mechanically tunable hydrogels with micro-scale well features ("microwells") using micro-contact printing for clonal muscle stem cell culture assays. Microcontact printing (μCP) is a simple and versatile method for generating cell culture substrates for micro-scale features for spatially restricting the cultures of single cells and their progeny. We explain how to use photolithography and polydimethylsiloxane casting to generate stamps capable of printing purified extracellular matrix proteins onto soft, hydrated poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels to generate arrayed microwells in a defined pattern. We summarize methods to analyze the viability, migration, and differentiation of individual MuSC clones within hydrogel microwell cultures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,031,156
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,780
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,641
of 316,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#8
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.